I don't know about a report coming out next month.
Mueller asked for and was granted a six months extension for his grand jury. That means he is still gathering evidence.
Hardly a surprise. The Dems strategy is to keep the investigation alive until Trump is out of office.
Evidence, the rule of law, and how our Constitution is set up, is what keeps the investigation alive. To ignore those key factors would be irresponsible and unpatriotic to our country and to who we are.
No. Dems obsessed with destroying Trump are what is keeping it alive. If the Dems actually cared about The Constitution, The Rule of Law, and The People, they would work with Trump as the Loyal Opposition.
dims care a great deal about the Constitution.
They are obsessed with destroying it.
You produced zero evidence of that. You are a liar.
Every post you've every made here is proof of that, BTK.
We all know the during the Kavanaugh lynching, you scumbag piles of shit demanded the end of due process and declared that enemies of the party are guilty until proven innocent, maybe even after.
{
"And the Democrats, like Mazie Hirono, or Richard Blumenthal, or other senators, are essentially saying that Brett Kavanaugh is guilty simply because he faces an allegation," Cotton said, "allegations in the New Yorker article that are completely unsupported by any evidence and that by the accuser’s own admission, only came to her after she spent six days working with a former elected Democrat and her lawyer."
"And allegations from Ms. Ford that are disputed by the four people she claims were in the house at the time she said what happened, happened," Cotton said. "Now, she’ll have a chance to present her case on Thursday, but some of the statements of my Democratic colleagues truly not just resemble McCarthyism, they resemble the kind of Stalinist show trials you saw in the Soviet Union–that merely making an accusation is enough if it’s in the greater interests of the party and the state, as Mazie Hirono essentially said on Jake Tapper’s show on Sunday."
Hirono told Tapper on CNN that Kavanaugh
doesn't get the presumption of innocence and cited his "ideological agenda" as a reason.}
Cotton: Democrats Undermine Due Process Norms With Kavanaugh Accusations
Of course that's not the first time you Stalinist traitors attacked due process;
{Some people who are accused of murder are innocent. That’s why we have trials, instead of sending every “person of interest” straight to the gallows. Likewise, some people on the no-fly list are not terrorists. But unlike people accused of murder, most on the no-fly list have never been charged, judged by their peers, or given the chance to prove they’re not terrorists. For instance, the one-year-old daughter of a woman named Ingrid Sanden, who was trying to fly from Arizona to Washington for Thanksgiving. Or the eleven-month-old son of a woman named Sarah Zaposky. Or any of the dozens of other infants who have been pulled off flights by the TSA. Or Daniel Brown, a Marine veteran of the Iraq war, or Lieutenant Colonel Robert Johnson of the U.S. Army. Or Congressmen John Lewis and Don Young, or Senator Ted Kennedy. These are some of the “terrorists” the Left (and impartial stalwarts like MSNBC) want banned from owning guns in bad neighborhoods. These are some of the “terrorists” who were high-profile enough to be exonerated.}
Democrat's War on Due Process | National Review
But your hatred of the 14th is just a small part of the war your evil party wages on civil rights;
{
Incredibly, the Democrats' disdain for the Bill of Rights includes even the 1st Amendment's protection of free speech. Party leaders are openly pushing to limit free speech rights when it conflicts with their own viewpoints.
In a speech at an Iowa community college, for example,
Hillary Clinton said: "We need to fix our dysfunctional political system and get unaccountable money out of it once and for all, even if that takes a constitutional amendment."
Left unsaid is that the only way to do what she suggests would be to put restrictions on the 1st Amendment. A couple years ago, 54 Senate Democrats voted for a
new constitutional amendment that would do just that.
Meanwhile, a
YouGov poll taken last May found that a majority of Democrats said they support government limits on what they consider to be "hate speech." Only 26% of Democrats said they opposed such limits.
In California, Democrats pushed a state bill that would have criminalized speech that questions the "consensus" on climate change.
And Attorney General Loretta Lynch
told the Senate Judiciary Committee in March that she has discussed with her colleagues the possibility of pursuing civil actions against "climate change deniers."
Democrats have long expressed frustration, if not outright contempt, for the Constitution whenever it hinders their ability to enact some new government program. President Obama has repeatedly complained about the "messy" process the Constitution's co-equal branches created, and has several times acted as though the Constitution's limits on the president's authority simply don't apply to him.}
Democrats Attack 3 Of The 10 Amendments In The Bill Of Rights | Investor's Business Daily
