FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information'

[iceberg]

'The FBI may have "edited and changed" key witness reports in the Hillary Clinton and Russia investigations'

"The other thing that I would ask you to look into, there is growing evidence that 302s were edited and changed,” Meadows told Horowitz. “Those 302s, it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals. And that is very troubling.”

No $h!t! Color me completely 'shocked'!



The treasonous, criminal Obama administration conspiracy run by the FBI continues to be exposed...

FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says

"may have" seems to feed what we want to be true. if they did, take 'em out. but news designed to get you emotional, isn't news and seldom is it the factual evidence said person is looking for.

"may have" is up there with CNN's anonymous sources.

AGAIN, it has already been proven that Strzok DID modify reports and documents. As posted, it is historical FACT that Strzok removed specific language straight out of the definition of the crime Hillary committed from the FBI's final report in order to protect Hillary from Indictment.

There is / was no 'may have' about it. HE DID IT.

FAIL!

then don't post the "may" stuff. it doesn't help the argument.

 

[easyt65]

The Little Trumpsters, suck up whatever and whenever Trump pathologically lies to them

Yes, please completely ignore the fact that the evidence presented is from the FBI itself, the FBI Director, and even the IG Report itself and did not include Trump or anything he said while you spew cr@p / talking points.

Nice Job, skippy.

 

[easyt65]

then don't post the "may" stuff. it doesn't help the argument.

I posted how the IG reported the BS 'may have' even though 'They DID' has already been proven - supported by evidence, which not only HELPS the argument but completely destroys the false snowflake assertions, talking points, and lies.

 

[joaquinmiller]

If your theory depends on everyone lying, except Donald Trump, you need to re-think it.

 

[Care4all]

The IG has claimed it was just 5 rogue people at the FBI, there's no freaking way it was just 5 they are covering their ass.

The IG report HAD to acknowledge wrong-doing by the FBI but went ridiculously out of its way to protect not only the FBI but to protect Hillary, Obama Cabinet Members, and Barak Obama himself.

For Example:

It was exposed that OBAMA US AG Loretta Lynch and FBI Director Comey collaborated in writing Hillary's exoneration letter months before the investigation was over / before the FBI even began interviewing witnesses ... AFTER - according to Comey in an interview - Lynch Obstructed Justice by 'DIRECTING' Comey to treat and call the investigation as a 'matter'.

Strzok e-mails show Strzok stating President Obama 'demanded to know everything' they were doing in their efforts against Trump, which means the entire operation was not only known to but approved / directed by Obama.

The investigation for over a year, was over months before they made the announcement, with the exception of the final interview with Hillary.... they already knew the results of the investigation and that she and her staff that sent any classified information to her, were not going to be charged with a crime....

And as long as Hillary did not come out with some sort of lie and bombshell in the final interview, she and her staff were not going to be charged.

Yet they waited and waited and waited to get this investigation over with, and make that announcement until the week right before the Democratic convention.....

Once AGAIN, they, the FBI...took steps or held back steps, like ending the investigation when the investigation was actually over with months earlier, and waited and waited, so to announce after she went through that hell of hanging the investigation over her head during the primaries, which HURT Clinton....

I didn't see any emails praising Hillary from here to high Heaven in those emails from Strzok and Page....all googoogah gahed over her becoming President.... what I saw was a disgust in the thought of Trump becoming President....and this bias of dislike was absolutely worth investigating, to make certain their decisions on the cases they were working on were not done in a nefarious way or illegal way, to support their bias.

And the IG said, he saw no bias in the actual investigations they worked on....and specifically looked at the decisions they made in the cases they were working on....

 

[Care4all]

'The FBI may have "edited and changed" key witness reports in the Hillary Clinton and Russia investigations'

"The other thing that I would ask you to look into, there is growing evidence that 302s were edited and changed,” Meadows told Horowitz. “Those 302s, it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals. And that is very troubling.”

No $h!t! Color me completely 'shocked'!



The treasonous, criminal Obama administration conspiracy run by the FBI continues to be exposed...

FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says

"may have" seems to feed what we want to be true. if they did, take 'em out. but news designed to get you emotional, isn't news and seldom is it the factual evidence said person is looking for.

"may have" is up there with CNN's anonymous sources.

AGAIN, it has already been proven that Strzok DID modify reports and documents. As posted, it is historical FACT that Strzok removed specific language straight out of the definition of the crime Hillary committed from the FBI's final report in order to protect Hillary from Indictment.

There is / was no 'may have' about it. HE DID IT.

FAIL!

When writing the report, after all of their investigation and interviews but right before the Fat Lady sung, (their interview with Hillary), they already knew through their investigation that she and staff would not be charged, that they did not have enough to charge her with a crime, especially the gross negligence crime, even though she was extremely careless....

and when the summary of the investigation was being written and being reviewed before the final draft was set, they did change a term from grossly negligent to extremely careless, for that specific reason, someone might take the term grossly negligent being used in the general sense and try to make it out to be Gross Negligence in the letter of the law sense....which if you read the whole draft, there was not an intent for Comey or the other investigators to imply she was guilty of gross negligence in the espionage act, because she was not.

Gross negligence: under the espionage act, required her staff to steal top secret information from its properly stored place in the SCIF area of the Intelligence agency that was storing the top Secret info on top secret level servers with no internet access, and somehow copy it, and remove it to disburse to an enemy.... or to be so careless even though you thought the enemy could get to this top secret document or info.

That did NOT happen....nothing was Marked Top Secret, that she received from her staff or from Syd Blumenthal, and most importantly, the 4 email chains that were later deemed top secret that they sent to her, her staff DID NOT GET from taking this information from its proper storing place, as the gross negligence espionage act law, requires.

simple as that....they did not break the Gross Negligence law....

and that term should have been changed....

they did the right thing.

 

[iceberg]

'The FBI may have "edited and changed" key witness reports in the Hillary Clinton and Russia investigations'

"The other thing that I would ask you to look into, there is growing evidence that 302s were edited and changed,” Meadows told Horowitz. “Those 302s, it is suggested that they were changed to either prosecute or not prosecute individuals. And that is very troubling.”

No $h!t! Color me completely 'shocked'!



The treasonous, criminal Obama administration conspiracy run by the FBI continues to be exposed...

FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says

"may have" seems to feed what we want to be true. if they did, take 'em out. but news designed to get you emotional, isn't news and seldom is it the factual evidence said person is looking for.

"may have" is up there with CNN's anonymous sources.

AGAIN, it has already been proven that Strzok DID modify reports and documents. As posted, it is historical FACT that Strzok removed specific language straight out of the definition of the crime Hillary committed from the FBI's final report in order to protect Hillary from Indictment.

There is / was no 'may have' about it. HE DID IT.

FAIL!

When writing the report, after all of their investigation and interviews but right before the Fat Lady sung, (their interview with Hillary), they already knew through their investigation that she and staff would not be charged, that they did not have enough to charge her with a crime, especially the gross negligence crime, even though she was extremely careless....

and when the summary of the investigation was being written and being reviewed before the final draft was set, they did change a term from grossly negligent to extremely careless, for that specific reason, someone might take the term grossly negligent being used in the general sense and try to make it out to be Gross Negligence in the letter of the law sense....which if you read the whole draft, there was not an intent for Comey or the other investigators to imply she was guilty of gross negligence in the espionage act, because she was not.

Gross negligence: under the espionage act, required her staff to steal top secret information from its properly stored place in the SCIF area of the Intelligence agency that was storing the top Secret info on top secret level servers with no internet access, and somehow copy it, and remove it to disburse to an enemy.... or to be so careless even though you thought the enemy could get to this top secret document or info.

That did NOT happen....nothing was Marked Top Secret, that she received from her staff or from Syd Blumenthal, and most importantly, the 4 email chains that were later deemed top secret that they sent to her, her staff DID NOT GET from taking this information from its proper storing place, as the gross negligence espionage act law, requires.

simple as that....they did not commit the Gross Negligence law....

and that term should have been changed....

they did the right thing.

i get confused here - did they do the right thing when comey used the words "gross negligence" or when told to tone it down?

 

[easyt65]

When writing the report, after all of their investigation and interviews but right before the Fat Lady sung, (their interview with Hillary), they already knew through their investigation that she and staff would not be charged...

They Absolutely Knew Hillary Would Not Be Charged - That Was PRE-DETERMINED! That was NEVER In Question!

It has been PROVEN indisputably that Obama US AG Loretta Lynch and FBI Director Comey collaborated on writing Hillary's exoneration BEFORE the investigation was over, BEFORE witnesses had been interviewed, and BEFORE the FBI began writing the final Report.

This is DOCUMENTED, REPORTED history!

 

[BluesLegend]

It was exposed that OBAMA US AG Loretta Lynch and FBI Director Comey collaborated in writing Hillary's exoneration letter months before the investigation was over / before the FBI even began interviewing witnesses ... AFTER - according to Comey in an interview - Lynch Obstructed Justice by 'DIRECTING' Comey to treat and call the investigation as a 'matter'.

A ridiculous double standard proving the political elite are above the laws that would land the average citizen in prison and the FBI is corrupt. I suspect the corruption is so damaging they are attempting to hide it from the public out of fear.

 

[BluesLegend]

There's a reason its called the DC swamp. I suspect we have only seen the tip of the iceberg on DC corruption.

What has been exposed so far is the collaborated effort within the Obama administration, to include his Cabinet Members and Directors of his Judicial, Intel Collecting, and Law Enforcement agencies to Obstruct justice to protect a beyond-obvious guilty hand-picked career criminal politician to whom the DNC GAVE their Presidential nomination after she proved she could not actually win it, to keep her in the race, and then to control the outcome of the election - as Barry did / attempted to do in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Israel as President - to make sure Hillary won.

It has also been exposed that this criminal administration that formed / was part of a revealed 'Secret Society' who engaged not only in Obstruction but also in Perjury, Sedition, Conspiracy, and even TREASON in a revealed declaration to 'stop Trump' from winning the WH and their also declared determination to affect a political COUP to remove the newly elected President from Office should he win.

This is not just a small matter of exposed 'Watergate II' - this is FAR beyond simply spying on a Presidential candidate by a rogue party but rises to the level of TREASON known / directed by the former US President and run by his criminal Cabinet and Agency Directors.

What has been exposed is the biggest political scandal / crime in this nation's history.

I shudder to think THIS all could be just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Personally, I think this is the whole freakin' iceberg.

The IG has claimed it was just 5 rogue people at the FBI, there's no freaking way it was just 5 they are covering their ass.

It has to be more than 5, or what? The Trump narrative breaks down? Say it ain't so!

Adults are talking run along.

 

[Care4all]

When writing the report, after all of their investigation and interviews but right before the Fat Lady sung, (their interview with Hillary), they already knew through their investigation that she and staff would not be charged...

They Absolutely Knew Hillary Would Not Be Charged - That Was PRE-DETERMINED! That was NEVER In Question!

It has been PROVEN indisputably that Obama US AG Loretta Lynch and FBI Director Comey collaborated on writing Hillary's exoneration BEFORE the investigation was over, BEFORE witnesses had been interviewed, and BEFORE the FBI began writing the final Report.

This is DOCUMENTED, REPORTED history!

they knew it after about a year in to the investigation, and were simply awaiting the final Hillary interview to close the case...they waited months before this interview took place....the Lord only knows why they waited so long after already discovering that there was no crimes they could charge her with, leaving open that the rules and regulation breaking was not a criminal matter but one the State Dept/admin could address.

The only thing I could think of that would be less damning for the FBI waiting so long and doing it right before the DNC Convention, was that Clinton's primary schedule was really busy...and she couldn't make it sooner.

 

[easyt65]

Gross negligence: under the espionage act, required her staff to steal top secret information from its properly stored place in the SCIF area of the Intelligence agency that was storing the top Secret info on top secret level servers with no internet access, and somehow copy it, and remove it to disburse to an enemy.... or to be so careless even though you thought the enemy could get to this top secret document or info.

That did NOT happen

So now you want to assume the authority to / ability to correct / speak for the FBI, who authored a report that stated Hillary Clinton was guilty of 'Gross Negligence', choosing the wording extremely carefully - right out of the very definition of the crime - in doing so?!

Bwuhahaha......

You say it did NOT happen. The FBI Final Report, before being changed by the disreputable, discredited, exposed Trump-Hating Hillary-protecting FBI Agent / FIRED Ex-Mueller Witch Hunter.

Hmmm....who to believe....



Bwuhahahaha......

 

[easyt65]

they knew it after about a year in to the investigation, and were simply awaiting the final Hillary interview to close the case...

You are twisting like a ribbon / flag in hurricane winds, snowflake.

So, again, you seek to speak for the FBI, claiming that without even interviewing any witnesses and fully completing the investigation the exposed Co-Conspirators just 'KNEW' Hillary was 'innocent'...

BWUHAHAHAHA......

 

[Care4all]

So now you want to assume the authority to / ability to correct / speak for the FBI, who authored a report that stated Hillary Clinton was guilty of 'Gross Negligence', choosing the wording extremely carefully - right out of the very definition of the crime - in doing so?!

liar! liar! pants on fire! the FBI's report NEVER said she committed the crime of gross negligence....they said the opposite.

 

[hunarcy]

Bwuhahaha...

The FBI publicly declared Hillary had Obstructed Justice, violating a subpoena and attempting to delete over 15,000 official documents that proved she violated both the FOIA and Federal Records Acts....

FBI Director Comet openly admitted to the public that Hillary broke laws, then added in her weak defense that she was too stupid to know she was doing it...

FVI Agent Strzok's Trump-Hating Pro-Hillary emails show the massive, criminal bias within the FBI in favor of Hillary...

The IG report just declared Hillary broke laws but then ridiculously claimed she never demonstrated 's intent' to break laws .... Despite the fact that she illegally refused to comply with the FBI's subpoena by Obstructing Justice by illegally deleting thousands of documents, illegally destroying classified devices, and using Bleach But in an attempt to erase evidence...

But snowflakes like you still insinuate / claim the FBI was 'out to get Hillary'...

These claims are no longer funny - they are DISTURBING.

None of that was proven.

Idle speculation doesn't convince you?

There was no bias against Trump by the FBU, that's what the IG report said. So you keep being a sucker for Trumps CYA scheme he's using to try staying in office and I'll deal with truth.

Actually, there was no finding about Trump. The IG found no bias against CLINTON.

Watchdog says Comey wasn't biased, reveals FBI agent's anti-Trump text

 

[Care4all]

they knew it after about a year in to the investigation, and were simply awaiting the final Hillary interview to close the case...

You are twisting like a ribbon / flag in hurricane winds, snowflake.

So, again, you seek to speak for the FBI, claiming that without even interviewing any witnesses and fully completing the investigation the exposed Co-Conspirators just 'KNEW' Hillary was 'innocent'...

BWUHAHAHAHA......

ahhhh nope..I leave the twisting and turning for you and younger folks!

 

[easyt65]

liar! liar! pants on fire! the FBI's report NEVER said she committed the crime of gross negligence....they said the opposite.

Yeah...right after it was PROVEN Strzok changed the wording of the report, el9iminating the specific words 'GROSSLY NEGLIGENT'.

Again, this is RECORDED, REPORTED HISTORICAL FACT, snowflake. Go peddle your BS somewhere else.



(Post#24, with link, dear. Stop dodging facts / evidence.)

 

[Care4all]

When writing the report, after all of their investigation and interviews but right before the Fat Lady sung, (their interview with Hillary), they already knew through their investigation that she and staff would not be charged...

They Absolutely Knew Hillary Would Not Be Charged - That Was PRE-DETERMINED! That was NEVER In Question!

It has been PROVEN indisputably that Obama US AG Loretta Lynch and FBI Director Comey collaborated on writing Hillary's exoneration BEFORE the investigation was over, BEFORE witnesses had been interviewed, and BEFORE the FBI began writing the final Report.

This is DOCUMENTED, REPORTED history!

Of course they knew, after they had investigated for a year or so.... that's why Comey was writing the Summary report he was suppose to give to the Justice Prosecutors once the fat lady sang..... the investigation was over a year long, it takes some time to write the summary with several drafts....on such a long case. It was leaked in early May that the investigation was all over but the final interview with Hillary, to close it. I posted a link on it to a thread here, when it happened in late April or early May.....

 

[joaquinmiller]

There's a reason its called the DC swamp. I suspect we have only seen the tip of the iceberg on DC corruption.

What has been exposed so far is the collaborated effort within the Obama administration, to include his Cabinet Members and Directors of his Judicial, Intel Collecting, and Law Enforcement agencies to Obstruct justice to protect a beyond-obvious guilty hand-picked career criminal politician to whom the DNC GAVE their Presidential nomination after she proved she could not actually win it, to keep her in the race, and then to control the outcome of the election - as Barry did / attempted to do in Egypt, Libya, Syria, and Israel as President - to make sure Hillary won.

It has also been exposed that this criminal administration that formed / was part of a revealed 'Secret Society' who engaged not only in Obstruction but also in Perjury, Sedition, Conspiracy, and even TREASON in a revealed declaration to 'stop Trump' from winning the WH and their also declared determination to affect a political COUP to remove the newly elected President from Office should he win.

This is not just a small matter of exposed 'Watergate II' - this is FAR beyond simply spying on a Presidential candidate by a rogue party but rises to the level of TREASON known / directed by the former US President and run by his criminal Cabinet and Agency Directors.

What has been exposed is the biggest political scandal / crime in this nation's history.

I shudder to think THIS all could be just 'the tip of the iceberg'. Personally, I think this is the whole freakin' iceberg.

The IG has claimed it was just 5 rogue people at the FBI, there's no freaking way it was just 5 they are covering their ass.

It has to be more than 5, or what? The Trump narrative breaks down? Say it ain't so!

Adults are talking run along.

Well, excuse the **** out of me, but your evidence that it has to be more than five, is your empty statement that it has to be more than five. Adult, your argument ain't.

 

[Care4all]

Yeah...right after it was PROVEN Strzok changed the wording of the report, el9iminating the specific words 'GROSSLY NEGLIGENT'.

AS he should have...

the report said from beginning to end, they could not prosecute her for any crimes....because they had none they could prosecute....

using the term gross negligence would have been grossly negligent of them...when they knew there was no crimes, including and especially the gross negligence law....which requires knowingly taking properly marked top secret information from it's proper storing place on a top secret server....

and that part, never happened....