Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Reports by folks like the Federalist Press.
That's some self fulfillling justification.
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
Can you prove it accurate? Is there *anything* that backs up this narrative? Anyone other than someone named 'Editor' on a WordPress blog backing up the claim.
The FBI has announced no such investigation. There's no mention of any of this on any other news service. If such an investitgation had actually been launched it would be everywhere.
How do you explain this enormous inconsistency?
It's like all your RW "facts", hater dupe. Corporate "librul" (my arse) media would cover it if it had ANY possible truth to it. All they care about is ratings/controversy.It would be a shame if Cankles and Bill ended up in orange....not really
FBI Launches Investigation Into Hillary Clinton Bribery Case
After several weeks of speculation whether the Department of Justice would investigate wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton and former president Bill Clinton in their “Pay for Play” scheme through their family’s foundation, the FBI has in fact launched a formal investigation.
At stake is more than $100 million purportedly paid to the Clintons through their foundation–The Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Reports have surfaced that the foundation served as nothing more than a pool into which bribes were paid, soliciting political favors from Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State.
Editor
Reports by folks like the Federalist Press.
That's some self fulfillling justification.
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
Can you prove it accurate? Is there *anything* that backs up this narrative? Anyone other than someone named 'Editor' on a WordPress blog backing up the claim.
The FBI has announced no such investigation. There's no mention of any of this on any other news service. If such an investitgation had actually been launched it would be everywhere.
How do you explain this enormous inconsistency?
She wants to believe it, so she does. It's truthy.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
Can you prove it accurate? Is there *anything* that backs up this narrative? Anyone other than someone named 'Editor' on a WordPress blog backing up the claim.
The FBI has announced no such investigation. There's no mention of any of this on any other news service. If such an investitgation had actually been launched it would be everywhere.
How do you explain this enormous inconsistency?
Shut up already, you're annoying as hell
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
Can you prove it accurate? Is there *anything* that backs up this narrative? Anyone other than someone named 'Editor' on a WordPress blog backing up the claim.
The FBI has announced no such investigation. There's no mention of any of this on any other news service. If such an investitgation had actually been launched it would be everywhere.
How do you explain this enormous inconsistency?
She wants to believe it, so she does. It's truthy.
Again, if you can't stay on topic why don't you go to another thread?
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
Can you prove it accurate? Is there *anything* that backs up this narrative? Anyone other than someone named 'Editor' on a WordPress blog backing up the claim.
The FBI has announced no such investigation. There's no mention of any of this on any other news service. If such an investitgation had actually been launched it would be everywhere.
How do you explain this enormous inconsistency?
She wants to believe it, so she does. It's truthy.
Again, if you can't stay on topic why don't you go to another thread?
Pointing out that your "topic" is pure bullshit is "on topic".
On the other hand, telling people to shut up and leave the thread is not.
This is Zone 2, guys. Remember
Can you prove its true? As this is just a WordPress blog post saying something that no news service backs up.
Can you prove it's not? Are all you left loons so apt at deflecting? If that's all you can harp on go bother someone else
Can you prove it accurate? Is there *anything* that backs up this narrative? Anyone other than someone named 'Editor' on a WordPress blog backing up the claim.
The FBI has announced no such investigation. There's no mention of any of this on any other news service. If such an investitgation had actually been launched it would be everywhere.
How do you explain this enormous inconsistency?
She wants to believe it, so she does. It's truthy.
Again, if you can't stay on topic why don't you go to another thread?
Pointing out that your "topic" is pure bullshit is "on topic".
On the other hand, telling people to shut up and leave the thread is not.
This is Zone 2, guys. Remember
That whole fuckin' "You can't believe everything you read on the Internet" meme went down with Brian Williams and George Stephwhateverhisname is.
You can't use that shit as a Cop out or straw man argument anymore.
It looks like the Senior Mod just violated the rules?
That whole fuckin' "You can't believe everything you read on the Internet" meme went down with Brian Williams and George Stephwhateverhisname is.
You can't use that shit as a Cop out or straw man argument anymore.
It would be a shame if Cankles and Bill ended up in orange....not really
FBI Launches Investigation Into Hillary Clinton Bribery Case
After several weeks of speculation whether the Department of Justice would investigate wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton and former president Bill Clinton in their “Pay for Play” scheme through their family’s foundation, the FBI has in fact launched a formal investigation.
At stake is more than $100 million purportedly paid to the Clintons through their foundation–The Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. Reports have surfaced that the foundation served as nothing more than a pool into which bribes were paid, soliciting political favors from Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State.
Editor
Reports by folks like the Federalist Press.
That's some self fulfillling justification.
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
No, that's not how it works. It's not up to me to "prove" your negative.
Reports by folks like the Federalist Press.
That's some self fulfillling justification.
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
No, that's not how it works. It's not up to me to "prove" your negative.
No, sorry....you are claiming the source is incorrect, it is you who must back up your "claim".
You can of course back up your claim can't you?
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
No, that's not how it works. It's not up to me to "prove" your negative.
I posted an article, you're free to refute it. If you can't stop bothering me. How's that?
No, you posted a blog post. An unsourced blog post from an absolutely ridiculous wordpress blog.
I'll ask you again. Do you believe everything you read on the internet?
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
No, that's not how it works. It's not up to me to "prove" your negative.
I posted an article, you're free to refute it. If you can't stop bothering me. How's that?
No, you posted a blog post. An unsourced blog post from an absolutely ridiculous wordpress blog.
I'll ask you again. Do you believe everything you read on the internet?
All over the internet guys like you claimed that Benghazi was a fiction of our imagination and here you now know we were right all along....are the Clinton's being "investigated"?
I don't know but they should be...and YOU need to prove the source wrong, it is after all YOU claim.
That's it attack the source and ignore the content...like a daffy left loon.
Since as far as I can tell, the "content" is entirely fictional, what else is there to attack but the source?
Well why don't you prove it's fictional instead of flapping your yap?
No, that's not how it works. It's not up to me to "prove" your negative.
No, sorry....you are claiming the source is incorrect, it is you who must back up your "claim".
You can of course back up your claim can't you?
Nope. Seriously, take a logic class. The blog claims there's an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation without providing any evidence that there is one. How exactly am I supposed to "prove" that that there there is a lack of an investigation?
