Rumpole
Diamond Member
- Mar 20, 2023
- 3,308
- 2,654
- 1,928
You are aware that the Deep State has gotten their mitts on the viral videos and will do anything it takes to get rid of the videos or the person who tells them "no." If I disclosed to you who still has copies, the deep state might do bad things to the person or the family of the person who still has copies. I'd have a copy if I were an expert computer genius, but, instead, God gave me art and business math skills, not mechanical, computer, engineering nor calculus skills. That said, if I did have to tell them who she is, they might harm her or a family member, since the Deep State is determined that communism is a much better of system for themselves, and they can easily kill off a village of people who disagree with them on anything the creepsister AOC comes up with and wishes to unilaterally execute her whims that make her have a lot of Benjamins. The Alinsky Method that has been in effect along with teachers in universities that teach teachers to tell their students to tell their families go to hell if they don't let them grow up fast enough, plus they lead them into agnosticism or atheism that begets another generation that prefers safety in a monarchy situation even if somebody dies because the king or queen has a bad day. And the deep state is already executing punitive measures against widows, the eldery, and of course want to expropriate to themselves all dead people's assets before the funeral happens. I really hate that about the Deep Creepy State that already has their goals solidified unless we engage in another war of the states.
You shouldn't criticize people who can't pull up evidence that you and your Deep State promotional teammates have dispersed already.
Oh, and when you get totalitarian power, you better not displease the empire's kingpin or they will treat you like you would like to treat Donald Trump.
Dear Beautress,
Your rebuttal contains several problematic elements.
Lack of evidence: You make several sweeping and serious claims about the existence and actions of the "Deep State" without providing any evidence to support those claims. You rely on vague assertions and conspiracy theories without verifiable facts.
Overgeneralization and stereotypes: You use derogatory language and stereotypes to attack Democrats, liberals, and specific individuals like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC). You make sweeping statements about their intentions and beliefs without offering any substantiation.
Incoherent reasoning: You jump between various unrelated topics, making it difficult to follow a coherent line of argument. You combine unrelated concepts such as the "Deep State," communism, agnosticism or atheism, monarchy, and expropriation of assets without providing clear connections or logical reasoning.
Demonization and fear-mongering: Your language used is inflammatory and designed to incite fear and hostility. You portray a dark and dangerous view of the "Deep State" and make unfounded claims about their intentions and actions, creating a narrative of impending doom.
Personal attacks and hostility: You resort to personal attacks and hostility towards those who may question or challenge the claims being made. You create an "us versus them" mentality and promotes a divisive and confrontational tone.
Please take this as constructive commentary on the issues of your reply.
Cheers,
Rumpole