Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
not at all. Why would I be terrified?and you have not provided me any definition of morals that says morals are universal and absolute.but they do...if morals can change then by definition t...
They can't.
By definition, they do not.
The very notion terrifies you, doesn't it? I've seen your type before kid. Closing your eyes doesn't change anything.
...
how many other societal morals have changed?
.....
Social mores are not morality writ large. They are at most a reflection of a given peoples fallible understanding of morality (which is universal).
what fears?I showed you how to start learning something. If you'd rather wallow in ignorance because it justifies the rest of the easy narrative you use to calm your fears, that's up to you.
...
...
how many other societal morals have changed?
.....
Social mores are not morality writ large. They are at most a reflection of a given peoples fallible understanding of morality (which is universal).
Of course they are.
Humans have made up the idea of right and wrong and have defined it and have changed that definition as they go along
and you assume I need to learn to agree with you....
how many other societal morals have changed?
.....
Social mores are not morality writ large. They are at most a reflection of a given peoples fallible understanding of morality (which is universal).
Of course they are.
Humans have made up the idea of right and wrong and have defined it and have changed that definition as they go along
Don't bring it back to your inability to comprehend semantics and ontology. I showed you where to start learning, but you are unwilling or unable.
not at all. Why would I be terrified?and you have not provided me any definition of morals that says morals are universal and absolute.but they do...if morals can change then by definition t...
They can't.
By definition, they do not.
The very notion terrifies you, doesn't it? I've seen your type before kid. Closing your eyes doesn't change anything.
.....
and you assume I need to learn to agree with you....
how many other societal morals have changed?
.....
Social mores are not morality writ large. They are at most a reflection of a given peoples fallible understanding of morality (which is universal).
Of course they are.
Humans have made up the idea of right and wrong and have defined it and have changed that definition as they go along
Don't bring it back to your inability to comprehend semantics and ontology. I showed you where to start learning, but you are unwilling or unable.
I don't.
tell me humans didn't create the idea of right and wrong who did?
If you were caught in an avalanche, you wouldn't die of suffocation; you would die of impotent frustration.
not at all. Why would I be terrified?and you have not provided me any definition of morals that says morals are universal and absolute.but they do...if morals can change then by definition t...
They can't.
By definition, they do not.
The very notion terrifies you, doesn't it? I've seen your type before kid. Closing your eyes doesn't change anything.
.....
Because your little ego has been conditioned to reject anything that suggests any truth or authority outside and above yourself (although you know there is). If you were caught in an avalanche, you wouldn't die of suffocation; you would die of impotent frustration. For perpetual children like you, every day in the real world is another stop-motion frame of the big avalanche. The only way a juvenile animal of your limitations can carry on is to pretend none of it is happening and you are in control of everything. Guess what, animal?
...
I came at the subject of morals in my own self initiated course of inquiry. ...
actually I have and don't forget you're the one who specializes in ad hominem attacks not me....
I came at the subject of morals in my own self initiated course of inquiry. ...
In other words, you haven't actually studied any of the subjects underlying the issues in question. You pretend your feeeeeelings are anything more than what they obviously are.
Some people still insist on fomenting pointless panic over the idea of global 'overpopulation.' There is no such thing, never has been any such thing, and the world is trending strongly in the other direction (as I've been saying for years). Global fertility rates are converging around 1.7 children per woman of childbearing age. Remember, the 'break even' point for fertility is 2.1 children per. In South Korea, the population decline is so dramatic several sources calculate that if current trends remain unchanged, South Koreans will go extinct by 2750.
We have to start thinking creatively about boosting, or at least maintaining population levels, or plan with open eyes what a world with far fewer people might look like.
South Korea’s population paradox
With a rapidly ageing population, low birth rates and young people who are increasingly shunning marriage, South Korea is in a population conundrum.www.bbc.com
We better hurry. How low is the number going to go?World population likely to shrink after mid-century, forecasting major shifts in global population and economic power
With widespread, sustained declines in fertility, the world population will likely peak in 2064 at around 9.7 billion, and then decline to about 8.8 billion by 2100 -- about 2 billion lower than some previous estimates, according to a new study.www.sciencedaily.com
That report is not about the myth of 'overpopulation.'We could listen to you or the UN
Harrowing New UN Report Finds Humans Are The ‘Unequivocal’ Cause Of Climate Change
The latest review of climate literature finds that the window to avert catastrophic warming with existing tools is rapidly closing.
Harrowing New UN Report Finds Humans Are The ‘Unequivocal’ Cause Of Climate Change
The latest review of climate literature finds that the window to avert catastrophic warming with existing tools is rapidly closing.www.huffpost.com
A new United Nations report reaffirms what world governments have known and failed to deal with for decades: that climate change is our fault, is already causing devastation around the globe and will continue to get worse.
How much worse is entirely up to us.
Good job contradicting yourself.We better hurry. How low is the number going to go?
Wrong.The state of our environment and its continued decline are proof that there are already too many humans on this planet.
Is that a quote from Cori Bush?Fretting about overpopulation is the ultimate in elitism.
"Far too many of YOU... just the right amount of ME."
Unkotare can't seem to connect the dots.The state of our environment and its continued decline are proof that there are already too many humans on this planet.
