Fact Check: The warmest decade in recorded history was not 1934

[CrusaderFrank]

A factcheck conducted by the Australian Associated Press has debunked a claim that has been appearing on Facebook (and here) that the warmest decade in history was in the 1930s. This is not true for New Zealand, for Australia, for the US or globally. Those of you supporting the AGW denier position need to consider why your side needs to lie as often as you do.

No, the warmest decade was not nearly 100 years ago

A viral post seen by more than 10 million people states our warmest decade was nearly a hundred years ago.

www.aap.com.au

The data was a DENIER! so it got what was coming!!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Give that the whole of human history is significantly less than a single pixel wide on the graphic you've provided, you have nothing here supporting your contention. There is also the point that you say we have no data past a few decades and yet provide a graphic that goes back 542 million years. Which is it?

Here are some data (from File:2000 Year Temperature Comparison.png - Wikimedia Commons) that are significantly more pertinent to the question of whether or not humans have caused global warming:

View attachment 683817

There is NO natural cause for the sudden and dramatic rise in temperatures. It, does, however, coincide precisely with the beginning of the Industrial Revolution and the increased CO2 due to humans' use (combustion) of coal and oil. Humans are responsible. And I'm sorry but a claim otherwise is simply unsupportable. Particularly when you present zero evidence to support your claim.

Wow so if CO2 is THAT POWERFUL, how come it gets stage fright and can't raise temperature in a lab?

How comes there's a 450,000 year long dataset showing CO2 LAGGING temperature?

 

[Crick]

The point was to show AGW beginning with the Industrial Revolution.

View attachment 685281

Where in all this noise, is the beginning of the Industrial Revolution?

Does your Google not work Todd? Do you have an encyclopedia? A text book on history or basic science?

It was generally thought to begin in the range of 1760 to 1840 Todd; when temperatures began to rise.

Why do you ask? Do you think there's too much noise to see AGW? Perhaps if the graph didn't have ten traces it might be easier to see. Let's try...

Temperature record of the last 2,000 years - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Is that better?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Does your Google not work Todd? Do you have an encyclopedia? A text book on history or basic science?

It was generally thought to begin in the range of 1760 to 1840 Todd; when temperatures began to rise.

Why do you ask? Do you think there's too much noise to see AGW? Perhaps if the graph didn't have ten traces it might be easier to see. Let's try...

View attachment 685586

Temperature record of the last 2,000 years - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Is that better?

Does your Google not work Todd? Do you have an encyclopedia? A text book on history or basic science?

Your claim, your chart. Little noisy, wasn't it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Does your Google not work Todd? Do you have an encyclopedia? A text book on history or basic science?

It was generally thought to begin in the range of 1760 to 1840 Todd; when temperatures began to rise.

Why do you ask? Do you think there's too much noise to see AGW? Perhaps if the graph didn't have ten traces it might be easier to see. Let's try...

View attachment 685586

Temperature record of the last 2,000 years - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Is that better?

It was generally thought to begin in the range of 1760 to 1840 Todd; when temperatures began to rise.

Well, shit, look at that big drop right before 1800.
Little Ice Age? The Industrial Revolution gets the blame for warming coming out of the LIA?

Is that better?

Yeah, your first chart was crap.
Not that this one does better with the MWP.

 

[jc456]

My wife gets REALLY hot when I wipe my dick off on the curtains.

Maybe some tax credits for that?

I need to talk algore.

Al Gore wipes his dick off on curtains? wow.

 

[Crick]

It was generally thought to begin in the range of 1760 to 1840 Todd; when temperatures began to rise.

View attachment 685616

Well, shit, look at that big drop right before 1800.
Little Ice Age? The Industrial Revolution gets the blame for warming coming out of the LIA?

Is that better?

Yeah, your first chart was crap.
Not that this one does better with the MWP.

If you think the rise we have seen since the Industrial Revolution could be a rebound from the Little Ice Age, you're a paragon of blithering idiocy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If you think the rise we have seen since the Industrial Revolution could be a rebound from the Little Ice Age, you're a paragon of blithering idiocy.

None of it is from a rebound? Zero?
It's all AGW?
Would we still be in the LIA if it weren't for coal use in the US and UK?

 

[AZrailwhale]

The point was to show AGW beginning with the Industrial Revolution.

View attachment 685281

Where in all this noise, is the beginning of the Industrial Revolution?

If you look at the data on the chart, the total temperature change from lowest to highest is ONE POINT SIX DEGREES Celsus over four hundred years The "alarming" rapid rise is 1.2 degrees in two hundred years.

 

[skookerasbil]

A factcheck conducted by the Australian Associated Press has debunked a claim that has been appearing on Facebook (and here) that the warmest decade in history was in the 1930s. This is not true for New Zealand, for Australia, for the US or globally. Those of you supporting the AGW denier position need to consider why your side needs to lie as often as you do.

No, the warmest decade was not nearly 100 years ago

A viral post seen by more than 10 million people states our warmest decade was nearly a hundred years ago.

www.aap.com.au

About 17 people care about this.

Dude...I ran out of footballs to spike after responding to your dud threads. So I decided to go all in on THAT ^^^