FACT CHECK: Closer look at Cain's retirement model

and they completely ignored the FACT that corporate taxes would be reduced to 9%!
Which would ultimately have a direct affect in several ways!
1) Prices may be lowered to consumers. OR
2) profits would be increased to shareholders who again would report TAXES!
3) 2 trillion in offshore assets moved back to USA!
4) if 1/4th used to hire people at $40K per year that would be 12 million people at work!
5) That would be then 9% X 40K $45 billion in personal tax revenue!
6) 12 million people spending $10K each with an economic multiplier of 1.18/$1.00
adds another $147.5 billion to economy!
7) 9% sales tax on $147.5 billion:adds another $13 billion in sales tax revenue.
All in all corporate taxes dropped would add by bringing back $1 trillion off shore almost $100 billion or more in federal tax revenue..
BUT the idiots at FACT CHECK??
HERE is what they said:
"For this fact-check, we'll only be talking about the personal income tax and the sales tax since the business tax directly affects only business owners and corporations."
IGNORED 33% of the revenue potential!!!
 
The left or the blacks does not like Cain because he is a self made man and did it on his own without Affirmative action and other social programs. Its a threat to them because it shows it can be done but they would rather have the programs.
Careful lest YOU be lumped/cast into the rascist pile darlin'...

Herman is a rugged individual/ist that did things in his life despite conventional wisdom, and what the Founders had laid fourth...:eusa_shhh:

Doesnt matter to the left what the rights say we are always considered racist even when its not a racial issue.
Then *WE* play into thier faux game. Don't we?
 
A couple of more aspects..
Right now at least 8 million people get at least $300/week in unemployment!
With Cain's 9% corporate taxes realizing at least $1 trillion coming back from off shore, and at least 4 million or more being re-hired that means over $100 billion in unemployment checks savings!
That was not calculated!
Then FACTCHECK never considered that 44.2 million people on food stamps in January,2011 would be cut in half.. again savings of nearly over $40 billion by going off food stamps..

Record number of Americans helped by government safety net - Apr. 13, 2011
 
Obama, Bill Ayers, and FactCheck.Org: All Have Ties To Annenberg Foundation...
Obama, Bill Ayers, and FactCheck.Org: All Have Ties To Annenberg Foundation | DBKP - Death By 1000 Papercuts - DBKP

Factcheck.org little on the slanted side and that's stating it lightly?!?!? so where's the real beef?!?!?(validity)

9262008obamafriends1-300x300.gif
 
Last edited:
Uncle Tom Cain's 9-9-9 SimCity Pizza Party Plan is clearly not good for most Americans.
YOU still have to highlight why...

Does it TAX your brain so much you cannot share why? Ot are YOU working the UNCLE TOM angle like a good little Marxist?

Why? I leave it to you to research Cain's history of doing NOTHING for his race and now condemns it as being "brainwashed". It sure as hell wasn't Republicans who gave blacks the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
 
The left or the blacks does not like Cain because he is a self made man and did it on his own without Affirmative action and other social programs. Its a threat to them because it shows it can be done but they would rather have the programs.

What leads you to believe that Cain didn't benefit from Affirmative Action and social programs?
 
Uncle Tom Cain's 9-9-9 SimCity Pizza Party Plan is clearly not good for most Americans.
YOU still have to highlight why...

Does it TAX your brain so much you cannot share why? Ot are YOU working the UNCLE TOM angle like a good little Marxist?

Why? I leave it to you to research Cain's history of doing NOTHING for his race and now condemns it as being "brainwashed". It sure as hell wasn't Republicans who gave blacks the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.
 
YOU still have to highlight why...

Does it TAX your brain so much you cannot share why? Ot are YOU working the UNCLE TOM angle like a good little Marxist?

Why? I leave it to you to research Cain's history of doing NOTHING for his race and now condemns it as being "brainwashed". It sure as hell wasn't Republicans who gave blacks the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.
The split in voting for the first civil rights act and it's 1968 follow up was based almost entirely on Geography, not party. Southern states voted against it. Northeastern states voted for it.

...and Southern states began turning R in the years that followed - which is why LBJ said upon signing the act that the Democrats had "lost the south for a generation". He was right!
 
YOU still have to highlight why...

Does it TAX your brain so much you cannot share why? Ot are YOU working the UNCLE TOM angle like a good little Marxist?

Why? I leave it to you to research Cain's history of doing NOTHING for his race and now condemns it as being "brainwashed". It sure as hell wasn't Republicans who gave blacks the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.

Democrat President Johnson twisted many arms to get it passed - but he got it passed.
 
Why? I leave it to you to research Cain's history of doing NOTHING for his race and now condemns it as being "brainwashed". It sure as hell wasn't Republicans who gave blacks the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.
The split in voting for the first civil rights act and it's 1968 follow up was based almost entirely on Geography, not party. Southern states voted against it. Northeastern states voted for it.

...and Southern states began turning R in the years that followed - which is why LBJ said upon signing the act that the Democrats had "lost the south for a generation". He was right!
Yeah SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. Like GEORGE WALLACE
 
Why? I leave it to you to research Cain's history of doing NOTHING for his race and now condemns it as being "brainwashed". It sure as hell wasn't Republicans who gave blacks the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.

Democrat President Johnson twisted many arms to get it passed - but he got it passed.

Yeah, Bull nuts was tough. That didnt diminish anything I posted however.
 
LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.
The split in voting for the first civil rights act and it's 1968 follow up was based almost entirely on Geography, not party. Southern states voted against it. Northeastern states voted for it.

...and Southern states began turning R in the years that followed - which is why LBJ said upon signing the act that the Democrats had "lost the south for a generation". He was right!
Yeah SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. Like GEORGE WALLACE

INDEED! And Strom Thurmond - who bolted for...wait for it now....

The Republican party.

Wallace admitted later in life that he was wrong. Strom just changed parties instead.
 
LOL Is that why Johnson thanked the repubs afterwards? Why a higher percentage of repubs voted for the measure?

Why democrats filibustered the measure?

Because of democrats there had to be a civil rights bill to combat their blatant racism that remains to this day.

Democrat President Johnson twisted many arms to get it passed - but he got it passed.

Yeah, Bull nuts was tough. That didnt diminish anything I posted however.
By a longshot
 
The split in voting for the first civil rights act and it's 1968 follow up was based almost entirely on Geography, not party. Southern states voted against it. Northeastern states voted for it.

...and Southern states began turning R in the years that followed - which is why LBJ said upon signing the act that the Democrats had "lost the south for a generation". He was right!
Yeah SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. Like GEORGE WALLACE

INDEED! And Strom Thurmond - who bolted for...wait for it now....

The Republican party.

Wallace admitted later in life that he was wrong. Strom just changed parties instead.
And? Your point? Strom=Racist? MAN UP asswipe? C'mon Karl? YOU can do it...show your Racist side...don't be fucking COY...BOY...
 
Yeah SOUTHERN DEMOCRATS. Like GEORGE WALLACE

INDEED! And Strom Thurmond - who bolted for...wait for it now....

The Republican party.

Wallace admitted later in life that he was wrong. Strom just changed parties instead.
And? Your point? Strom=Racist?

YES! Of course. He was a racist piece of shit. Perhaps you agreed with him? If you thought I was trying to be coy you're too dumb to read. There was nothing coy about it - he was a racist piece of shit who bolted the Dem party when it aligned with the Northeast and Republicans capitalized on the racist white vote.

And drop the boy crap, you drunk fuck.
 
INDEED! And Strom Thurmond - who bolted for...wait for it now....

The Republican party.

Wallace admitted later in life that he was wrong. Strom just changed parties instead.
And? Your point? Strom=Racist?

YES! Of course. He was a racist piece of shit. Perhaps you agreed with him? If you thought I was trying to be coy you're too dumb to read. There was nothing coy about it - he was a racist piece of shit who bolted the Dem party when it aligned with the Northeast and Republicans capitalized on the racist white vote.

And drop the boy crap, you drunk fuck.
Thread isn't about me or your fantasies of me Karl.

STFU.
 

Forum List

Back
Top