candycorn
Diamond Member
I think Mark Dice is the guy who interviews 300 people to show clips of the 5 who are not too bright. The others; not sure.
Facebook Bans Milo Yiannopoulos, Alex Jones, Other Dangerous Figures
- Thread starter skews13
- Start date
I think Mark Dice is the guy who interviews 300 people to show clips of the 5 who are not too bright. The others; not sure.
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #122
Mark Dice is not banned from Facebook (as of yet), Paul Joseph Watson is.
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #123
Make no mistake, this is censorship in the election runup.
beagle9
Diamond Member
- Nov 28, 2011
- 51,421
- 20,807
- 2,290
What did this Watson do ??
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #125
Posted pro-Trump, anti SJW material. He's affiliated with Alex Jones sometimes, who Alphabet and Facebook also decided is verboten.
They will attempt to silence all dissension.
skye
Diamond Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 70,520
- 80,492
- 3,635
He did nothing! he is a conservative ....that's all....his sin is he is a conservative like me and you
Time to regulate Social Media.
TIME TO REGULATE SOCIAL MEDIA!
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,296
- 124,677
- 3,645
Then that is a sad comment on conservatism. Also, that amounts to a prediction that all conservatives will get banned... as he is "just a conservative"...
Or not, and instead what you said is stupid on all counts.
- Moderator
- #128
How very small government of you....
Let’s nationalize social media!
Gee, kind of sounds like a... socialist
Comrade, this is a brilliant idea! The Facepage must serve the will of the people!
Dana7360
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2014
- 15,147
- 13,605
- 2,405
This is too funny.
You don't know that facebook is a private company and can ban anyone they want. Especially those who violate their TOS rules.
There's a very good way to not get banned.
Don't violate the rules.
Dana7360
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2014
- 15,147
- 13,605
- 2,405
That's a 180 about face from a few years ago.
Conservatives screamed that the internet wasn't a utility and shouldn't be regulated when Obama wanted to keep the internet net neutral.
Now that trump has removed the net neutral rules and big internet companies are doing things you don't like, you want it to be a public utility and regulated.
You should have agreed with us in the Obama years and not cheered on trump when he deregulated the internet and removed net neutrality.
justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 38,451
- 31,391
- 2,905
candycorn
Diamond Member
More government intervention?
candycorn
Diamond Member
So the govt will regulate this board?
skews13
Diamond Member
- Mar 18, 2017
- 11,694
- 15,744
- 2,415
- Thread starter
- #136
Perfect example of why they are being banned. Propaganda is not dissension. Right wing extremism isn’t conservatism. They just thought they could sell it that way on the sites that are now banning them. If they think there crap sells, they are welcome to try to sell it on their own media.
Sure. Government should seize control of the media. What could go wrong?
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
PJW did nothing to violate the Fakebook TOS...He got run off primarily because he's associated with Alex Jones.
Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Says the delusional pinhead whose go-to source is the propaganda mill Daily Kooks.
Marion Morrison
Diamond Member
- Feb 10, 2017
- 59,298
- 16,870
- 2,190
- Banned
- #140
Some real Americans ought to start their own versions of FB and Twitter and make them better and with no bias. No banning someone based on their political views. Like if USMB was Twitter.
I've seen "Options" so far, and all look like ass.
The problem is, Facebook, Google and Twitter are already entrenched.
Google should never have been allowed to get control of internet traffic the way it has. I knew it was bad when they were buying up servers. It's the same with GoDaddy buying up domains. I see GoDaddy commercials and get mad.
Sooner of later whatever you're trying to access on the internet has a high chance of going through Google's servers, and if it's a metatag they don't like, they can filter it right there.
I've seen "Options" so far, and all look like ass.
The problem is, Facebook, Google and Twitter are already entrenched.
Google should never have been allowed to get control of internet traffic the way it has. I knew it was bad when they were buying up servers. It's the same with GoDaddy buying up domains. I see GoDaddy commercials and get mad.
Sooner of later whatever you're trying to access on the internet has a high chance of going through Google's servers, and if it's a metatag they don't like, they can filter it right there.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
Americans Dying For Israel Is Not In Americas Best Interests- Started by skews13
- Replies: 4
-
Trump is preparing for an epic defeat in the mid-terms!- Started by Astrostar
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
