Explosive "Gang Rape" Report Out of the UK

Rupert Lowe is just a knuckle dragger. Like Reform, the "political party"/business he used to be in's many supporters.

This "report" is not a report at all. It's a piece of politics, done by a politician, and designed to get the most attention possible.

That isn't to say there aren't problems in the UK. However most grooming gangs in the UK are white.


"Most grooming gang offences carried out by white men, police chiefs say"

But people don't care about the facts, they just want to hear that all their life problems come from the immigrants.
Those police chiefs were, and are lying. Just like that 12 year old Scottish girl was vindicated, Lowes report is comprehensive and took years to find all the data the government has been hiding.
 
Those police chiefs were, and are lying. Just like that 12 year old Scottish girl was vindicated, Lowes report is comprehensive and took years to find all the data the government has been hiding.

There's a Tic Toc user that posts content of immigrants in the UK being arrested for crimes against children and the discussions they have with them. Those people are truly stupid.
 
Those police chiefs were, and are lying. Just like that 12 year old Scottish girl was vindicated, Lowes report is comprehensive and took years to find all the data the government has been hiding.
The big lie is libs pretending that muslim rape of white girls in the UK does not exist on a massive scale
 
The big lie is libs pretending that muslim rape of white girls does not exist on a massive scale
Yup, look at them here claiming it was white gangs.

Never have we heard even rumors of that till this reporting.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Ava
How can 500 years of excellence
Well, I would dispute that claim. The UK has been many things, and in the past they were a good friend to the USA.

They were never, as you put it, excellent at much of anything other than war.
 
Well, I would dispute that claim. The UK has been many things, and in the past they were a good friend to the USA.

They were never, as you put it, excellent at much of anything other than war.
Collectively europe ruled the world for 500 years

At various times Spain or France was on top

But in the end the it was Rule Britania

And they didnt do that without excellence across the board from military to industrial and whatever
 
The report itself, which I will link below, is long and detailed. But to nutshell it, for DECADES immigrant men in the UK, mostly from Pakistan and other Muslim men, groomed and then raped and trafficked mostly disadvantaged white girls.

The scope and breadth of rape gangs and sex-trafficking rings in the United Kingdom go much farther than first feared. They also go back in history much longer than people knew – aided and abetted by government and police more concerned about political correctness than protecting Britons from sexual predation.

Why? As MP Rupert Lowe shows in his comprehensive report, the perpetrators overwhelmingly came from immigrant communities, specifically Pakistanis and Muslims in general. Rather than deal sharply with them to end rapes and sex trafficking, British authorities worried more about being called racists than the rapes and trafficking of British girls (via Twitchy):

Ninety-five percent of the perps in these rings were Muslim men. That's an estimate from an Islamic imam.

The motives were explicitly connected to the Islamic religion and culture, Lowe reports, and some of the victims got trafficked to Muslim countries for forced marriages:

MP Rupert Lowe is a far right hate monger who was elected to Parliament in 2024. His "Restore Britain" is basically the KKK for Brits, so any report or data he presents is highly biased and unreliable.



This guy is beyond batshit crazy. Nothing supports this man's hate mongering and bullshit.
 
Well, I would dispute that claim. The UK has been many things, and in the past they were a good friend to the USA.

They were never, as you put it, excellent at much of anything other than war.
Your hate for Anglo Saxon UK is obvious
 
Well, I would dispute that claim. The UK has been many things, and in the past they were a good friend to the USA.

They were never, as you put it, excellent at much of anything other than war.

War, conquest, self-dealing, the worst excesses of colonialization and a complete willingness to marry off royal daughters to cement political/military alliances.
Start here:

Every major review has emphasised that recorded statistics severely understatereality:

â—Ź Baroness Casey National Audit on Group-Based Child SexualExploitation and Abuse (June 2025): The audit explicitly states that thescale, nature, and characteristics of group-based child sexual exploitationremain impossible to quantify precisely due to inconsistent datacollection and historical suppression.
● Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) and multiplelocal inquiries (2022–2025): “It is simply not possible to know the scale”because ethnicity, group offending, and historical cases were routinelyunrecorded or shelved to protect “community cohesion.”

So what they're really saying is that the numbers don't support what they're telling you so they're just going to use anecdotes to support their claims because race is "under reported".

How convenient.
 
Your hate for Anglo Saxon UK is obvious

I don't hate my ancestors but I don't worship them or everything they've ever done. The sun never set on the British Empire for 400 years. You couldn't even last 100 years.

But Empires are built on blood and treasure. Right and wrong isn't determined by morality, but more often on who controls the levers of power or who has the more powerful army. Some British Kings were decent human beings, and others were quite mad.

You're in your Mad King phase.
 
Collectively europe ruled the world for 500 years

At various times Spain or France was on top

But in the end the it was Rule Britania

And they didnt do that without excellence across the board from military to industrial and whatever
Well, I guess if you think subjugating people is some form of excellence.
 
Your hate for Anglo Saxon UK is obvious
You clearly don't understand what you are talking about, and assigning an emotion to my position makes you worse than a progressive. You should know better.

Anglo-Saxon UK disappeared by the 13th century with the invasion and subjugation of the Anglo-Saxons by the Normans, a descendant line of Vikings.
 
The question is why?

How can 500 years of excellence be wiped out in just two generations by invaders from islam?

Lets learn from the British experience and not repeat their mistakes in America

I would argue it wasn't JUST the invaders; it was the Woke Mind Virus that allowed and then even PREFERRED them over native Brits.
 
The report itself, which I will link below, is long and detailed. But to nutshell it, for DECADES immigrant men in the UK, mostly from Pakistan and other Muslim men, groomed and then raped and trafficked mostly disadvantaged white girls.

The scope and breadth of rape gangs and sex-trafficking rings in the United Kingdom go much farther than first feared. They also go back in history much longer than people knew – aided and abetted by government and police more concerned about political correctness than protecting Britons from sexual predation.

Why? As MP Rupert Lowe shows in his comprehensive report, the perpetrators overwhelmingly came from immigrant communities, specifically Pakistanis and Muslims in general. Rather than deal sharply with them to end rapes and sex trafficking, British authorities worried more about being called racists than the rapes and trafficking of British girls (via Twitchy):

Ninety-five percent of the perps in these rings were Muslim men. That's an estimate from an Islamic imam.

The motives were explicitly connected to the Islamic religion and culture, Lowe reports, and some of the victims got trafficked to Muslim countries for forced marriages:
Globalist rape culture.
 
Yeah, the report "These rapes were not reported bc of political correctness"

Them: "Yeah well they must not have happened, they weren't reported"


It's the real Epstein report you all wanted, but since dark skinned people are involved, that's fine. it must be wrong, then.

Exactly the problem the UK had.

Why don't you read stories of these young girls, one of which says that a social worker asked her if she wanted to PLAY A GROOMING VICTIM in a play since she had "experience".

Right.
No, it's not the "Epstein report you all wanted" at all.

The "report" is not really a report. It's political and nothing more. The report says "darkies done it", and completely ignores the fact that white people also do it.

It's like having an Epstein report that tells the world that Prince Andrew is guilty, while Trump and other rich people are just ignored. So not much change from the Epstein files then.

I didn't say there wasn't a problem. There is a problem, and part of that problem lies in Pakistani communities which are very much enclosed. Inbreeding is a problem, grooming is a problem because of the conservative nature of the communities, the young grow up with weird conservative views and want to rebel against that, and white girls are easy, because they've got problems, because society teaches girls to walk around with half their tits out, short shirts, to drink a lot, smoke, and sex is a right of passage to adulthood.

But these problems aren't just within these communities, they're all over. And yet you find a report that says "well, the darkies done it" and you jump on it.

I say "it's not just the minorities" and you say "you should love this report because it shows the problems". But the problem is, it's political and it's being used by Lowe and his one man party to promote intolerance of immigrants. Just what the UK doesn't need.
 
15th post
The report itself, which I will link below, is long and detailed. But to nutshell it, for DECADES immigrant men in the UK, mostly from Pakistan and other Muslim men, groomed and then raped and trafficked mostly disadvantaged white girls.

The scope and breadth of rape gangs and sex-trafficking rings in the United Kingdom go much farther than first feared. They also go back in history much longer than people knew – aided and abetted by government and police more concerned about political correctness than protecting Britons from sexual predation.

Why? As MP Rupert Lowe shows in his comprehensive report, the perpetrators overwhelmingly came from immigrant communities, specifically Pakistanis and Muslims in general. Rather than deal sharply with them to end rapes and sex trafficking, British authorities worried more about being called racists than the rapes and trafficking of British girls (via Twitchy):

Ninety-five percent of the perps in these rings were Muslim men. That's an estimate from an Islamic imam.

The motives were explicitly connected to the Islamic religion and culture, Lowe reports, and some of the victims got trafficked to Muslim countries for forced marriages:

250,000 girls raped and abused, while the left cheered.

This is on the scale of the Rape of Nanking.
 
Back
Top Bottom