Explain this to me like I am 5 years old

even if firearms were outlawed and confiscated that wouldn't include criminals and it would not stop firearms from being smuggled in and sold to criminals. all it would do is disarm law abiding folks.
Yes it would
Because any criminal illegally possessing a firearm will be arrested
 
Yes it would
Because any criminal illegally possessing a firearm will be arrested
Someone yesterday said if we tracked all the illegal guns or if we could track them, we'd see they go from gang banger in Chicago from someone in a red state who got them from a gun manufacturer. Purchased them. So the gun manufacturer doesn't care. Corporations only care about $.

According to a federal study, the most common source of illegal guns used in New York City crimes are from Southern states with lax gun laws:
  • Georgia: 1,736 guns
  • Virginia: 1,677 guns
  • South Carolina: 1,421 guns
 
Traffic stops, warrants for other reasons, etc.

It's a useful tool. Just ask law enforcement what they say. Instead of asking your own butthole.
LOL so leave criminals armed to rob and murder until by accident they are caught while all their victims are easy prey cause you disarmed them.
 
And of course, since criminals will just smuggle in more firearms or steal them from the military they will never be disarmed.
 
Someone yesterday said if we tracked all the illegal guns or if we could track them, we'd see they go from gang banger in Chicago from someone in a red state who got them from a gun manufacturer. Purchased them. So the gun manufacturer doesn't care. Corporations only care about $.

According to a federal study, the most common source of illegal guns used in New York City crimes are from Southern states with lax gun laws:
  • Georgia: 1,736 guns
  • Virginia: 1,677 guns
  • South Carolina: 1,421 guns
I wished that those guns stayed out of the hands of gangs. You see gangs kill someone from their car with a submachine gun and drive away. It is sad to see my state supply guns to gangs and other criminals.
 
LOL so leave criminals armed to rob and murder until by accident they are caught while all their victims are easy prey cause you disarmed them.
That's a silly fantasy you have in your head because you've been told by the NRA to say that.

And banning all guns . Isn't and has never been on the table anyway. So take your stupid distraction walking.
 
Just like all the guns originally sold by those gun shops...

Only to have a huge, beyond huge, black market selling them illegally.... later down the road.

Thank God the shooter's father didn't legally own a Machine gun!!!!

1725582626819.png


How many of the firearms being used by the Hispanic cartels taking over apartments in Colorado and Chicago were obtained from Obama's, Fast-And-Furious program?

Can't wait to find out how those AR-15's the cartels are using were obtained.

SMILE



:)
 
The SCOTUS stated, unequivocally, that we Americans have the right to carry a gun outside the home:
The Court has little difficulty concluding also that the plain text of the Second Amendment protects Koch’s and Nash’s proposed course of conduct—carrying handguns publicly for self-defense. Nothing in the Second Amendment’s text draws a home/public distinction with respect to the right to keep and bear arms, and the definition of “bear” naturally encompasses public carry. Moreover, the Second Amendment guarantees an “individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation,” id., at 592, and confrontation can surely take place outside the home.

Some states require a permit to carry a gun outside the home; most do not.
Most of the states which require a permit recognize the permits from other states as sufficient to legally carry a gun in that state.

A few states – CA, NY, HI – do NOT recognize out-of-state permits.
They do not allow open carry without a permit
They do not allow out-of-state residents to obtain a carry permit.
That is, there is no way for me, a resident oh Ohio, to legally carry a gun in CA NY HI.

How can it be that CA NY HI do not violate my right to carry a gun – and thus, violate the 2nd Amendment?
Hey... I'm totally cool with this.

I carry a gun when I drive, and I just don't go to these places. Or Minnesota, Massachusetts, Maryland, Connecticut, and by extension, the entire northeasterner US.

I miss Maine...but it is what it is.



If you live in those places and you're waiting for me to bring you something... It's gonna be a long wait.
Minnesota is the only one that is somewhat burdensome. The rest of them I wouldn't go to anymore anyway.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom