Exclusive: WSJ Reveals Trump’s Epstein Birthday Note…Authentic, In Congress, and Undeniable

I was unclear. I meant they didnt care about Birthdaycardgate.

I know that Democrats and "not Democrats" were told by the Thought Influencers to care about the Epstein Files as soon as the Autopen Administration no longer controlled them and then Trump hesitated to dump them all into public.

It really doesn't seem strange to you that it was right to withhold the Epstein files from the public during the whole 4 years of the Biden administration, but then suddenly with Trump in office, it became very, very wrong?
Why did Trump & his lapdogs promise over & over again that the files would be released if he won reelection, then change his mind? Because Bondi told him his depraved ass was all over them, that's why.

You can cry & piss & moan about Dems all you want to. But your defense of Trump & his lackeys like Johnson & Comer who are trying to cover up for crimes committed against underage girls shows that you are as ******* morally bankrupt as they & the rest of the perpetrators are.
 
Why did Trump & his lapdogs promise over & over again that the files would be released if he won reelection, then change his mind? Because Bondi told him his depraved ass was all over them, that's why.

You can cry & piss & moan about Dems all you want to. But your defense of Trump & his lackeys like Johnson & Comer who are trying to cover up for crimes committed against underage girls shows that you are as ******* morally bankrupt as they & the rest of the perpetrators are.
Why is His name in the files and why are they being redacted?
 
I don't give a **** what you remember.
Whoops, now you're mad.


You see the world in very simplistic terms. There are those in lockstep with your dear leader, and those who aren't.
Not true.
Put me down for the latter.
So, the fact that you did not call for the release of the Epstein Files during the Autopen administration means you were in lockstep with your Vegetative God?

Or, wait. What names did you call Biden during his time as the Dodderer in Chief?

I don't remember any.
You guys are batshit insane.
Pot, meet Kettle.
 
Wrong. You can say such shit but you can’t establish it.
I proved he was lying about not doodling or drawing right here in this thread. Pay attention!

See how you operate? You make upand blurt out whatever pleases your own ears, regardless of truth.
 
Why did Trump & his lapdogs promise over & over again that the files would be released if he won reelection, then change his mind? Because Bondi told him his depraved ass was all over them, that's why.

You can cry & piss & moan about Dems all you want to. But your defense of Trump & his lackeys like Johnson & Comer who are trying to cover up for crimes committed against underage girls shows that you are as ******* morally bankrupt as they & the rest of the perpetrators are.
33,000 files released.


:oops8: :oops8: :oops8: :oops8: :(
 
Screenshot (5).webp
 
Don't you think there'll be experts testifying for both sides? It's incumbent on Don to prove it isn't his signature since he initiated the suit. The evidence isn't definitive either way.
Only Donald has to prove it is a fake signature....he's the one making the claim, then he has to prove his claim and it is not his signature, not his card as claimed...wall street journal does not... from what I understand?? And Trump has to prove that the WSJ knew it was a fake, if a fake, and did not have any good reason to believe it was real.

Trump will lose this suit.
 
Only Donald has to prove it is a fake signature....he's the one making the claim, then he has to prove his claim and it is not his signature, not his card as claimed...wall street journal does not... from what I understand?? And Trump has to prove that the WSJ knew it was a fake, if a fake, and did not have any good reason to believe it was real.

Trump will lose this suit.
That's right, and the WSJ won't be bribing him, like CBS and ABC did.
 
Only Donald has to prove it is a fake signature....he's the one making the claim, then he has to prove his claim and it is not his signature, not his card as claimed...wall street journal does not... from what I understand?? And Trump has to prove that the WSJ knew it was a fake, if a fake, and did not have any good reason to believe it was real.

Trump will lose this suit.
In a civil suit the standard is "Preponderance of Evidence," not "proof beyond a reasonable doubt."
 
15th post
childish leftwing hoax .. so Trump types out a letter draws a woman's body around it and then signs it eh ? handwriting experts will determine if the signature is real . and forensics will determine if the letter is 22 years old or something cooked up by the left after they lost the recent election .. more likely than not the lefts latest Russian collusion like hoax .
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom