Ex-MSNBC Analyst: Harris Is Staring at Electoral Disaster

The evidence is that he's almost always consistently wrong.

No, I'd never piss away my vote on a third party.

The Jews and Arabs are going to murder each other no matter who is in office. I just can't get worked up about it.
You’ll piss away your vote supporting mass murder & Dick Cheney.

The mass murder of children enabled by the candidate you support does not excite your interest.
 
Last edited:
Yawn, tell you what, why don't you get to your hippy drum circle, and let me know how it goes.
Some members of the hippy drum circle, the dumb ones, are serving as stooges for Kamala Harris, who has enabled a genocide and allied herself with Dick Cheney.
 
Some members of the hippy drum circle, the dumb ones, are serving as stooges for Kamala Harris, who has enabled a genocide and allied herself with Dick Cheney.

I'm not even sure what you are whining about, other than just reflexively shilling for Trump.

Both parties are beholden to the Zionists. The Zionists spend billions of dollars burnishing their image in this country while the rest of the world hates them.
 
I'm not even sure what you are whining about, other than just reflexively shilling for Trump.

Both parties are beholden to the Zionists. The Zionists spend billions of dollars burnishing their image in this country while the rest of the world hates them.
And yet you are stupid enough to serve these Zionists and vote for candidates that fund their atrocities.
 
And yet you are stupid enough to serve these Zionists and vote for candidates that fund their atrocities.

No, I'm smart enough to vote for my own interests.

Don't get me wrong, I think what is happening in Palestine is wrong, but it's also no skin off my ass if they do get ethnically cleansed from Gaza.
 
No, I'm smart enough to vote for my own interests.

Don't get me wrong, I think what is happening in Palestine is wrong, but it's also no skin off my ass if they do get ethnically cleansed from Gaza.
Your own interests include the mass murder of children?

So you feel genocide is wrong, but all those corpses really don’t matter much to you.

And you believe keeping inept corrupt authoritarian Democratic politicians in office is very important. We need more inflation and mass illegal immigration.


 
Last edited:
Your own interests include the mass murder of children?

So you feel genocide is wrong, but all those corpses really don’t matter much to you.

And you believe keeping inept corrupt authoritarian Democratic politicians in office is very important. We need more inflation and mass illegal immigration.

Guy, here's the thing. What is happening in Gaza is horrible.

But it would happen no matter who is in the White House.

So it is effectively a non-issue.

What is an issue is that Trump is completely unfit for office, corrupt, and a threat to democracy.
 
Guy, here's the thing. What is happening in Gaza is horrible.

But it would happen no matter who is in the White House.

So it is effectively a non-issue.

What is an issue is that Trump is completely unfit for office, corrupt, and a threat to democracy.
Is Kamala corrupt? Does she favor censorship?

If the Harris-Cheney alliance loses Democrats would have a chance to boot out the warmongers.
 
Is Kamala corrupt? Does she favor censorship?

If the Harris-Cheney alliance loses Democrats would have a chance to boot out the warmongers.

No she isn't.

Getting sensible control on the sewer of social media is long overdue.

If Trump wins, we won't have a democracy anymore... and The Zionists will get all the bombs they want.
 
No she isn't.

Getting sensible control on the sewer of social media is long overdue.

If Trump wins, we won't have a democracy anymore... and The Zionists will get all the bombs they want.
Kamala isn’t corrupt?





You poor innocent dupe.

So you support “sensible control” on free speech? Who will be deciding which speech is inappropriate? Some bureaucrat? Speech these bureaucrats disagree with will be censored.

Liberals used to support freedom. When did you become a sniveling ***** who serves authoritarian politicians?


Biden and Harris have already given the Zionists so many bombs you dope!


You don’t really believe the election year rhetoric about Trump ending democracy.

Why do you believe the Democratic Party can never improve?
 
Last edited:
Nope.

Those guys who have money KNOW what a disaster Trump will be if he gets back into the White House.
Those plutocrats never serve their own interests, they exclusively think about what’s best for mankind.
 
For all the hype around the latest polls, which has flipped Nate Silver’s Electoral College projection, it doesn’t feel like she’s ahead decisively a la Joe Biden in 2020. If Kamala is mentioned, it’s her lack of interviews, her bleeding of support among core Democratic voter groups, and the polls not comporting with voter concerns. Trump is leading handily on the issues of crime, immigration, and the economy. The latest New York Times polling string isn’t good for her either. The comical aspect about that is that now liberals are saying the NYT’s polls are too Republican-friendly.

Liberals will likely say that again since the latest NYT/Siena surveys are not good. If this holds, Harris is in a position no better than that of Biden, who dropped out in July. Ex-MSNBC analyst Mark Halperin said that if this poll doesn’t turn out to be an outlier, Harris is staring at an electoral disaster.

Former President Donald Trump is leading Harris in key sun belt states, including Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina, according to a Monday New York Times/Siena College Poll. Halperin, on “Wake Up America,” said if Harris loses these three sun belt states along with Nevada, she will have just one path to victory, and if Nebraska changes how it allocates its electoral votes, even that path could vanish.

“It leaves out one of the four sun belt states, but I have reason to believe the trend there would be the same. This is what Trump pollsters and strategists predicted about a month ago, that he would reassert the dominance he had in those four sun belt states,” Halperin said. “And of course, if that happens, and I’m not sure it is, the Times polls may be outliers, but if it’s true, it means that Kamala Harris is back to where Joe Biden was before his debate with Donald Trump, which is to have exactly one Electoral College path. And by the way, if Nebraska changes the way it allocates its electoral votes, she’ll have no Electoral College paths if the Times polls are right.”


BJ -

Harris knows that she is behind, that is why she wants another debate.

All of the spamming of social media by the "bergs" of the world, is not going to change the minds of swing state voters where normal-regular people live.
Everything is on Pennsylvania, that's it... Who ever wins that, is very likely to take it...

Pennsylvania is a toss up.

1728896199274.webp

Discount all Pollster with a rating 2.0 or below... It's a toss up...
 
Oh, they do what is good for business.

The fact that they realize how dangerous Trump is for business says a lot.
Plutocrats are not philanthropists. Plutocrats are hostile to the American people.

These plutocrats would be happy to accept an economic downturn if they could profit off it, perhaps through insider knowledge or bailouts.


The plutocrats want to control U.S. foreign policy, educational policy, immigration policy. What kind of stooge would cheer them on?
 
Last edited:
15th post
Plutocrats are not philanthropists. Plutocrats are hostile to the American people.

These plutocrats would be happy to accept an economic downturn if they could profit off it, perhaps through insider knowledge.

The plutocrats want to control U.S. foreign policy, educational policy, immigration policy. What kind of stooge would cheer them on?
The plutocrats are hiding under your bed, ready to cut off your dick tonite.

Pleasant dreams, asshole.
 
Back
Top Bottom