* Evidense The Election WasStole*

[beagle9]

Are those rejections entered into the court records ? If not then they are not evidence.

They weren't entered because they'd be committing perjury if they did...

Again - look at what Trump's lawyers said in court vs. what they said to you sheep.

They probably weren't entered because then they would become official court records, so is it that the courts didn't want no part of it becoming official record's, so it basically thumbed it's nose at the evidence in hopes that the presenters of that evidence would just give up maybe ???

I mean signing a legal affidavit is the first step to serious commitment for the witnesses, and the witnesses committed fully, but the courts rejected their testimony and evidence, otherwise not allowing it to be entered into the official court record ???? Why ????

 

[JoeB131]

They probably weren't entered because then they would become official court records, so is it that the courts didn't want no part of it becoming official record's, so it basically thumbed it's nose at the evidence in hopes that the presenters of that evidence would just give up maybe ???

I mean signing a legal affidavit is the first step to serious commitment for the witnesses, and the witnesses committed fully, but the courts rejected their testimony and evidence, otherwise not allowing it to be entered into the official court record ???? Why ????

because they didn't present any evidence, that's why.

Some of the courts outright mocked Trump's lawyers.

Again, you can scream an election was stolen all day, but if you go into court and make a false claim, that's a crime. Trump knew this, which is why his lawyers didn't do it.

 

[beagle9]

They probably weren't entered because then they would become official court records, so is it that the courts didn't want no part of it becoming official record's, so it basically thumbed it's nose at the evidence in hopes that the presenters of that evidence would just give up maybe ???

I mean signing a legal affidavit is the first step to serious commitment for the witnesses, and the witnesses committed fully, but the courts rejected their testimony and evidence, otherwise not allowing it to be entered into the official court record ???? Why ????

because they didn't present any evidence, that's why.

Some of the courts outright mocked Trump's lawyers.

Again, you can scream an election was stolen all day, but if you go into court and make a false claim, that's a crime. Trump knew this, which is why his lawyers didn't do it.

So even though his lawyers had sworn affidavits and testimonies, they feared making claims in court with them, and then they maybe feared for their witnesses to be called to court if the court would have allowed them the hearings needed or the hearings that they may have deserved ?? It's just not adding up.

 

[JoeB131]

So even though his lawyers had sworn affidavits and testimonies, they feared making claims in court with them, and then they maybe feared for their witnesses to be called to court if the court would have allowed them the hearings needed or the hearings that they may have deserved ?? It's just not adding up.

Um, yeah, because if they said the shit in court they said in public, they'd be commiting perjury.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Sorry bout that,

1. The President stood down, for the good of the Nation, for peace, he is a very, very good man.
2. Hide the children.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Evidence is useless because Dummycraps just want to remain willfully-ignorant.
If it doesn't fit their agenda....it doesn't exist.

Exactly,guys I advise not to feed the trolls. They have been sent here by their boses to derail any kind of discussion on this,best to ignore them as I always do.

 

[beagle9]

So even though his lawyers had sworn affidavits and testimonies, they feared making claims in court with them, and then they maybe feared for their witnesses to be called to court if the court would have allowed them the hearings needed or the hearings that they may have deserved ?? It's just not adding up.

Um, yeah, because if they said the shit in court they said in public, they'd be commiting perjury.

Never know if they would have stood behind their testimonies or not, because the cowardice politicized courts weren't going to give them the chance, therefore refusing to serve the country and it's citizen's like it should have. We'll never know, and that's a shame.

 

[beagle9]

So even though his lawyers had sworn affidavits and testimonies, they feared making claims in court with them, and then they maybe feared for their witnesses to be called to court if the court would have allowed them the hearings needed or the hearings that they may have deserved ?? It's just not adding up.

Um, yeah, because if they said the shit in court they said in public, they'd be commiting perjury.

Y'all love that (IF) word don't cha ?? If, If, If, If, If, If..... Unbelievable.