Everything Is Sexism Now. With Obama It Was Racism. Now You Can't Call Hillary By Her Name

no wonder men were racing to Sarah Palins rallies. They would pay to see her breasts and legs! but does anyone know a guy just dying to see Hillary in Pants?

You know, I'm not partisan, and I don't care for either, so I can objectively say this. However, if truth be told, if we compared Hillary and Sarah at similar ages, I think Hillary is probably better looking.

hillaryclintonittakesavillage2.jpg
4DACB6D6-995F-48F2-BAC3-7C56C233C6A5_w268.jpg


sarahpalin_a.jpg
Sarah-Palin-at-Liberty-Convocation.png


But I guess that is all personal preference. I mean, just compare their husbands. Which husband do more women desire? That will give you a gauge of which woman was more desirable in her prime.


Once Sarah's looks fade, will she have the intellectual heft to remain relevant?
I am happily married to a middle aged woman...As such, I take offense to your comments.
Stand down.
 
The media is done hammering Hillary for obstruction of justice with her emails. She's had her meeting with Obama, and they've dropped it like a bad habit. Now every Republican is being accused of sexism.

The latest proclamation from the Hillary camp is "You're being sexist if you call her Hillary". Doesn't matter if she has her first name plastered all over the place. Good God....I am just fed up with these people.

hc-244.jpg

Sexism appears to be the new racism. This is why only a woman need run as a Democrat.
After a dust up with a female Today Show host Rand Paul was warned to be careful when talking to women by Andrea Mitchell and Chuck Todd.
Rand Paul was being interviewed.....well, not interviewed.....but lectured to by Today co-host Savannah Guthrie repeatedly who badgered him over his views on foreign policy following his presidential announcement.

Quote: Things got so heated during the discussion that Paul had to tell Guthrie “before we go through a litany of things you say I’ve changed on, why don't you ask me a question.”

After discussing whether or not he had presidential ambitions growing up, the interview got combative over whether or not Senator Paul would ever support a U.S. nuclear deal with Iran. Despite explaining that “part of the problem” is that Iran has interpreted the nuclear framework differently than the United States, Guthrie interrupted the Tea Party senator and demanded that he “take that issue off the table.”

The Today co-host eventually allowed Senator Paul to answer her question but then proceeded to lecture him on how his foreign policy positions have evolved over the years:

You have had views in the past on foreign policy that are somewhat unorthodox, but you seem to have changed over the years. You once said Iran was not a threat, now you say it is. You once proposed ending foreign aid to Israel, you now support it at least for the time being…You wanted to cut defense spending and now you want to increase it 16%. So I just wonder if you’ve mellowed out.

For his part, Paul objected to Savannah Guthrie’s editorializing on his foreign policy positions and asked her to “let me explain instead of talking over me." Paul then told her “before we go through a litany of things you say I’ve changed on, why don't you ask me a question? Have I changed my opinion? That would be sort of a better way to approach an interview.”

NBCpaul_0.jpg
Guthrie continued to interrupt the senator without letting him articulate what his actual foreign policy views were and Paul once again asked her to just let him answer the question.

You have editorialized. Let me answer a question. You ask a question and you say have your views changed instead of editorializing and saying my views have changed.

Eventually the NBCer allowed her Republican guest to answer her question but she made sure to take one final shot at his foreign policy views:

I think the question I was getting at in general is just that when you came to Washington and you realized I am going to run for president, have you mellowed or tempered your views at all?

Guthrie's harsh treatment of Senator Paul was in stark contrast to a recent interview she conducted with liberal Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren. During the March 31 discussion, Guthrie repeatedly urged Warren to run for president, even to the point of wondering whether or not Hillary Clinton was liberal enough for the modern Democratic Party.

Rand Paul to Savannah Guthrie Instead of Editorializing Ask Me A Question

The sexism is flying....but from the liberal side. Salon got into it and made a point of saying that "Rand Paul got into it with another woman....." as if he's some kind of male chauvinistic jerk. How dare he talk down to woman reporters!!!

If that isn't sexist, I don't know what is. They assume that women journalists need protection from the big...bad Republican bully.

Rand Paul clashes with another woman news anchor for daring to ask him a real question

If you've ever sat through an interview with Obama, Barney Frank, or any other liberal on Fox News, every single one of them reacts the same exact way that Rand Paul did. Not only that, but every single Democrat pundit I've seen tries to filibuster the discussion and refuses to answer questions. They have their talking points and they stick with them, and if shouting over everyone else will make their point, or confuse the discussion, so be it. This is just the liberal media is throwing shit on the wall and hoping it sticks. They're accusing Rand Paul of doing something wrong when in fact they know it is a tactic they use religiously.



Meh. It is true calling women by their first name while calling men of the same rank by their last name or title is sexist....but we call Bill Bill. And Mitt Mitt.
 
Once Sarah's looks fade, will she have the intellectual heft to remain relevant?
Once Hillary's looks fade will she have the intellectual heft to remain relevant?

She never had the Intellect and now she only has the Heft!

Hillary's looks faded about 10 years ago. If she becomes president she's gonna be the ugliest POTUS since Abe Lincoln.

I'd keep her away from the selfie sticks then...
 
She ought never be referred to as anything but "Mrs. Bill Clinton" because her husband is the ONLY reason any of us have ever heard of her.

Irony. She expects to be elected because she is a woman...and "its time" for a woman...but the only successful thing she has ever done is ride her man's coattails right up to the top of the Socialist-Democratic Party...just like that fool John Kerry, who married himself a Ketchup Heiress who bought him some nice offices.

I'd rather have the Massachusetts Senator, Pocahontas. She's crazy as a sprayed roach, but at least she got were she is only by lying about her ancestry and not by riding her husbands coattails into a job she is no where near qualified for.
 
sxdchj.png


This is Hillary, back in days when she was politically conservative and when she volunteered to campaign for Barry Goldwater.
 
The DNC will have nothing to cheer about come next summer. Remember how boring and pathetic their 2012 convention was? even then they had nothing to gloat about. what will be the theme this time? Gay Rights? Meanwhile Iran is building Nukes.

332-206...Give me an O, give me a B, Give me an A....
 
Everything Is Sexism Now. With Obama It Was Racism. Now You Can't Call Hillary By Her Name


You're beginning to understand how the Left works.

They can't justify their agenda. So they lie about their opponents instead, accusing them of racism, sexism, heartlessness, greed, and everything else under the sun.

No proof needed.

And that's how they keep getting elected.

Looks like this week it's Sexism.

Probably something else next week. Or next month. It's a long time till the election.
 
Everything Is Sexism Now. With Obama It Was Racism. Now You Can't Call Hillary By Her Name


You're beginning to understand how the Left works.

They can't justify their agenda. So they lie about their opponents instead, accusing them of racism, sexism, heartlessness, greed, and everything else under the sun.

No proof needed.

And that's how they keep getting elected.

Looks like this week it's Sexism.

Probably something else next week. Or next month. It's a long time till the election.

Those are only things that are proven recipes for them.

They're pressing for women president (If not Hillary, then Elizabeth), so they can play sexism card.

I'm wondering who they gonna blame for sexism when neither one gets through the D primary.
 
"Everything Is Sexism Now. With Obama It Was Racism. Now You Can't Call Hillary By Her Name"

No, everything is ridiculous conservative whining about non-issues, rightwing myths, and numerous lies contrived by the right predicated on conservative ignorance and stupidity – the OP and this thread being one of many examples.
 
"Everything Is Sexism Now. With Obama It Was Racism. Now You Can't Call Hillary By Her Name"

No, everything is ridiculous conservative whining about non-issues, rightwing myths, and numerous lies contrived by the right predicated on conservative ignorance and stupidity – the OP and this thread being one of many examples.
And you are one of many examples of the stupidity and insanity of the left. The kind of ridiculous nonsense that is running rampant in this country. The "One Issue" voters that could care less that the party they support is running this country into the ground and intentionally turning us into a world-wide laughingstock.

Get lost......
 
.

It was obvious that any criticisms of Obama were going to be met with "racist!", and there is no doubt that we'll be hearing "sexist!" as long as Hillary is running.

They're committed to Identity Politics, and that's just the way it is.

It sure would be nice to discuss the criticism and the issue on which it is based, but we don't do that here in America any more.

.
 
.

It was obvious that any criticisms of Obama were going to be met with "racist!", and there is no doubt that we'll be hearing "sexist!" as long as Hillary is running.

They're committed to Identity Politics, and that's just the way it is.

It sure would be nice to discuss the criticism and the issue on which it is based, but we don't do that here in America any more.

.

What was obvious was that people who wanted to defend their unfounded criticism of Obama would whine that they were being called racist....even when they weren't being called racist.
 
The left will be putting their race cards back in their wallets in about a year and a half, and right now they're polishing up their shiny new sexist cards, and getting ready to start pulling them out.
 
if hillary doesn't campaign on taking out Iran before they start taking out nations with bombs, she's done.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom