Everyone is now a potential "security threat" to the US.....

[frigidweirdo]

So, first it was Greenland and Canada. Then Venezuela. Now it's the UK and France.

Europe’s ‘destructive moral ideas’ could jeopardise nuclear powers, JD Vance says | Euractiv

He argued "Islamists-aligned or Islamist-adjacent people are currently holding office in European countries"

www.euractiv.com

"Vice-President JD Vance warned on Friday that France and the United Kingdom could pose a future security risk to the US if what he called “Islamist-adjacent” ideas were to gain political influence."

He's basically saying the US is justified in invading any country on the planet. These people have no shame.

 

[theHawk]

So, first it was Greenland and Canada. Then Venezuela. Now it's the UK and France.

Europe’s ‘destructive moral ideas’ could jeopardise nuclear powers, JD Vance says | Euractiv

He argued "Islamists-aligned or Islamist-adjacent people are currently holding office in European countries"

www.euractiv.com

"Vice-President JD Vance warned on Friday that France and the United Kingdom could pose a future security risk to the US if what he called “Islamist-adjacent” ideas were to gain political influence."

He's basically saying the US is justified in invading any country on the planet. These people have no shame.

Very true, if they continue down the path of Islamification.

 

[petro]

He's basically saying

No.
You are putting words in his mouth.
Shit like this is why normal people don't take you seriously.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

So, first it was Greenland and Canada. Then Venezuela. Now it's the UK and France.

Europe’s ‘destructive moral ideas’ could jeopardise nuclear powers, JD Vance says | Euractiv

He argued "Islamists-aligned or Islamist-adjacent people are currently holding office in European countries"

www.euractiv.com

"Vice-President JD Vance warned on Friday that France and the United Kingdom could pose a future security risk to the US if what he called “Islamist-adjacent” ideas were to gain political influence."

He's basically saying the US is justified in invading any country on the planet. These people have no shame.

At no point did the Vice President or President say it would be justified in invading any country on the planet.

 

[frigidweirdo]

At no point did the Vice President or President say it would be justified in invading any country on the planet.

No. I'm sure Hitler also didn't say that his justifications would be justified in invading any country he liked. But he did, and he ended up using those excuses.

Are you that naive that you think politicians don't try and hide their actions by not telling everyone what they're up to?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Very true, if they continue down the path of Islamification.

So we're back in 2001 where any Muslim is a target.

Funny how Trump has a problem with Muslims killing Christians in Nigeria, but doesn't have a problem with Trump killing Christians in or close to Venezuela.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

No. I'm sure Hitler also didn't say that his justifications would be justified in invading any country he liked. But he did, and he ended up using those excuses.

Are you that naive that you think politicians don't try and hide their actions by not telling everyone what they're up to?

In Trump's case he's noted for telling you what he's going to do and his administration is the most transparent administration that we've ever had.
He has made it clear that he doesn't want to be known as a wartime president, but he has also made it clear that he will go after designated terrorist groups, including narco-terrorist groups.
So, he can keep on attacking drug running boats and grabbing up Venezuelan oil tankers, as Venezuela is under sanctions at present and to let the oil tankers go on their way, would mean you aren't enforcing sanctions and thus they would be worthless.
As to Europe, they keep pushing for a military confrontation with Russia over the Ukraine issue and to go along with that would lead us into World War III and the end of that would mean "NO" survivors. The world would become a radioactive wasteland. Those few who could get into underground government bunkers still wouldn't survive, as the planet wouldn't be able to sustain life for centuries.

 

[MarcATL]

So we're back in 2001 where any Muslim is a target.

Funny how Trump has a problem with Muslims killing Christians in Nigeria, but doesn't have a problem with Trump killing Christians in or close to Venezuela.

Nailed it!

 

[JGalt]

So we're back in 2001 where any Muslim is a target.

Funny how Trump has a problem with Muslims killing Christians in Nigeria, but doesn't have a problem with Trump killing Christians in or close to Venezuela.

Awwww, those poor Christian drug smugglers.

 

[frigidweirdo]

In Trump's case he's noted for telling you what he's going to do and his administration is the most transparent administration that we've ever had.
He has made it clear that he doesn't want to be known as a wartime president, but he has also made it clear that he will go after designated terrorist groups, including narco-terrorist groups.
So, he can keep on attacking drug running boats and grabbing up Venezuelan oil tankers, as Venezuela is under sanctions at present and to let the oil tankers go on their way, would mean you aren't enforcing sanctions and thus they would be worthless.
As to Europe, they keep pushing for a military confrontation with Russia over the Ukraine issue and to go along with that would lead us into World War III and the end of that would mean "NO" survivors. The world would become a radioactive wasteland. Those few who could get into underground government bunkers still wouldn't survive, as the planet wouldn't be able to sustain life for centuries.

Wow, the first sentence made me laugh so much.

Yeah, he tells you he's going to release the Epstein files. Then he does EVERYTHING he can to avoid releasing the files.

He gets a minion to say there will be no prosecutions over the Epstein files.

Then Congress forces him to release the files and he spends ages trying to get Congressmen and women to vote against releasing them.

Then he says he wanted to release them all along, but won't be releasing files that are involved in any criminal cases. Of which there were none, until Trump was forced to release the files, so he makes some cases which will spend three years in the courts so he doesn't have to release those files.

Then the date for the files to come out comes and goes and he still hasn't released all the files, which he is LEGALLY REQUIRED TO DO.

That's about as transparent as a brick.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Nailed it!

It's always the Hitler comparison. Hitler used Jews to keep people angry. The right in the US uses Muslims.

Trump has his policies, the "Muslim ban" which didn't target a single 9/11 participant country, and yet was designed to "protect America", how can you protect America while only banning countries that weren't the problem in the first place?

Hitler finding excuses to go invaded countries, Dubya did it with Iraq, Trump seems to be trying it on with Venezuela. Iraq was a disaster for the US, and Venezuela would probably we worse.

But you mention Hitler and his supporters don't understand why we show Hitler. Trump isn't Hitler, but he uses some of the same strategies as Hitler used. Hitler was a populist, just like Trump. Policies were messed up, just like Trump.

 

[LeftofLeft]

So, first it was Greenland and Canada. Then Venezuela. Now it's the UK and France.

Europe’s ‘destructive moral ideas’ could jeopardise nuclear powers, JD Vance says | Euractiv

He argued "Islamists-aligned or Islamist-adjacent people are currently holding office in European countries"

www.euractiv.com

"Vice-President JD Vance warned on Friday that France and the United Kingdom could pose a future security risk to the US if what he called “Islamist-adjacent” ideas were to gain political influence."

He's basically saying the US is justified in invading any country on the planet. These people have no shame.

We have every right to mitigate and eliminate threats no matter where they are coming from. That is not invading a country. Don’t conflate the two.

 

[Lisa558]

So we're back in 2001 where any Muslim is a target.

Funny how Trump has a problem with Muslims killing Christians in Nigeria, but doesn't have a problem with Trump killing Christians in or close to Venezuela.

The Muslim savages - one of them chopped a Christian young man into pieces and fed the body parts to the dogs - are targeting Christians BECAUSE they are Christian. It’s the same way the Muslim savages targeted Jewish babies and toddlers and set them in fire - BECAUSE they were Jewish.

Trump is targeting scumbug drug dealers coming out of Venezuela.

You deranged leftists defend Muslim savages and foreign drug dealers, yet incite violence against innocent Jews. You people are totally nuts - and dangerous.

 

[Lisa558]

It's always the Hitler comparison. Hitler used Jews to keep people angry. The right in the US uses Muslims.

Trump has his policies, the "Muslim ban" which didn't target a single 9/11 participant country, and yet was designed to "protect America", how can you protect America while only banning countries that weren't the problem in the first place?

Hitler finding excuses to go invaded countries, Dubya did it with Iraq, Trump seems to be trying it on with Venezuela. Iraq was a disaster for the US, and Venezuela would probably we worse.

But you mention Hitler and his supporters don't understand why we show Hitler. Trump isn't Hitler, but he uses some of the same strategies as Hitler used. Hitler was a populist, just like Trump. Policies were messed up, just like Trump.

Hitler’s strategy was to eliminate innocent Jews, who were law-abiding citizens of their countries.
.
Trump’s strategy is to eliminate Islamic savages, who are targeting non-Muslims and torturing them to death.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So, first it was Greenland and Canada. Then Venezuela. Now it's the UK and France.

Europe’s ‘destructive moral ideas’ could jeopardise nuclear powers, JD Vance says | Euractiv

He argued "Islamists-aligned or Islamist-adjacent people are currently holding office in European countries"

www.euractiv.com

"Vice-President JD Vance warned on Friday that France and the United Kingdom could pose a future security risk to the US if what he called “Islamist-adjacent” ideas were to gain political influence."

He's basically saying the US is justified in invading any country on the planet. These people have no shame.

Bomb Iran for being “2 weeks away” but turn control of France to Islam

 

[Lisa558]

Bomb Iran for being “2 weeks away” but turn control of France to Islam

The Islamists are being empowered by the Left in all countries. They are probably laughing at how helpful the “progressives” are in allowing Islamists to turn the world back into the 14th century, overtaken by Muslims.

 

[citygator]

JD Vance is providing thought food for the little brains. The biggest risk to American peace and harmony is the pseudo right wing movement called MAGA.

 

[j-mac]

Islam is a threat to the world. It’s a demonic religion. Period.

 

[frigidweirdo]

We have every right to mitigate and eliminate threats no matter where they are coming from. That is not invading a country. Don’t conflate the two.

The "we're not going to go around warmongering" and then get into power and be a warmongerer.

Hence why Trump said "“Look, there’s a tradition in American politics that after you win an election, you sort of put things behind you,” he told reporters inside Trump Tower."

Basically, say whatever you want in an election, and do whatever you want after you've won, no matter what you said.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The Islamists are being empowered by the Left in all countries. They are probably laughing at how helpful the “progressives” are in allowing Islamists to turn the world back into the 14th century, overtaken by Muslims.

What's an "Islamist"?

How are they being "empowered"?