Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

[Doc7505]

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'​

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with me

twitchy.com

29 Nov 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with men, which was noble, even if we disagree with some of the methods and outcomes. But the late-stage feminism, with its capitulation to the transgender agenda, has literally undone over a century of work on behalf of women.
To the point where women are not only second-class citizens to delusional men who pretend they're women, but we can't even be called women anymore.
They've had a list of euphemisms for us -- womb owner, egg producer, birthing person -- but now we're literally being redefined by being non-transgender.

​

This is maddening.
Language means nothing now.
This is the actual patriarchy the Left rallied against. And now they're all in for it in the name of 'trans rights.'
We are now a subset of the transgender movement.
No longer women. But non-trans.
We'll be referred to as 'non-transgender women' going forward.
And yet completely on brand for the NYT.
The same people who screamed Donald Trump would turn America into Gilead -- where women are all red-robed drones who simply make babies have been awfully silent about the actual erasure of women.



Commentary:
Oddly the use of using the term non-Transgender woman is Orwellian and continues according to most. No matter how it's being explained by psychiatrists with personal dysphorias. who now recommend mutilation our our young.
Neo-Marxist Democrats have unleashed a battle with the Dark Principalities and Powers and Wicked Forces in the heavenly realms.

"Don't you see that the whole claim NEWSPEAK is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make Thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words to express it."
George Orwell​

​

 

[JGalt]

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'​

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with me

twitchy.com

29 Nov 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with men, which was noble, even if we disagree with some of the methods and outcomes. But the late-stage feminism, with its capitulation to the transgender agenda, has literally undone over a century of work on behalf of women.
To the point where women are not only second-class citizens to delusional men who pretend they're women, but we can't even be called women anymore.
They've had a list of euphemisms for us -- womb owner, egg producer, birthing person -- but now we're literally being redefined by being non-transgender.

​

This is maddening.
Language means nothing now.
This is the actual patriarchy the Left rallied against. And now they're all in for it in the name of 'trans rights.'
We are now a subset of the transgender movement.
No longer women. But non-trans.
We'll be referred to as 'non-transgender women' going forward.
And yet completely on brand for the NYT.
The same people who screamed Donald Trump would turn America into Gilead -- where women are all red-robed drones who simply make babies have been awfully silent about the actual erasure of women.



Commentary:
Oddly the use of using the term non-Transgender woman is Orwellian and continues according to most. No matter how it's being explained by psychiatrists with personal dysphorias. who now recommend mutilation our our young.
Neo-Marxist Democrats have unleashed a battle with the Dark Principalities and Powers and Wicked Forces in the heavenly realms.

"Don't you see that the whole claim NEWSPEAK is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make Thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words to express it."
George Orwell


​

You would think the leftist idiots would have gotten it after their loss, but they just keep doubling down on their idiocy.

 

[westwall]

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'​

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with me

twitchy.com

29 Nov 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with men, which was noble, even if we disagree with some of the methods and outcomes. But the late-stage feminism, with its capitulation to the transgender agenda, has literally undone over a century of work on behalf of women.
To the point where women are not only second-class citizens to delusional men who pretend they're women, but we can't even be called women anymore.
They've had a list of euphemisms for us -- womb owner, egg producer, birthing person -- but now we're literally being redefined by being non-transgender.

​

This is maddening.
Language means nothing now.
This is the actual patriarchy the Left rallied against. And now they're all in for it in the name of 'trans rights.'
We are now a subset of the transgender movement.
No longer women. But non-trans.
We'll be referred to as 'non-transgender women' going forward.
And yet completely on brand for the NYT.
The same people who screamed Donald Trump would turn America into Gilead -- where women are all red-robed drones who simply make babies have been awfully silent about the actual erasure of women.



Commentary:
Oddly the use of using the term non-Transgender woman is Orwellian and continues according to most. No matter how it's being explained by psychiatrists with personal dysphorias. who now recommend mutilation our our young.
Neo-Marxist Democrats have unleashed a battle with the Dark Principalities and Powers and Wicked Forces in the heavenly realms.

"Don't you see that the whole claim NEWSPEAK is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make Thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words to express it."
George Orwell


​

Yeah, the leftists really are fucked in the head.

 

[two_iron]

I remember when the party that likes to **** kids came out with the "bonus hole" terminology.

They're soulless, subhuman garbage. We have one job - continue to laugh and point at that shit and MARGINALIZE it again.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

At least they still say the word, women.

 

[hadit]

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'​

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with me

twitchy.com

29 Nov 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with men, which was noble, even if we disagree with some of the methods and outcomes. But the late-stage feminism, with its capitulation to the transgender agenda, has literally undone over a century of work on behalf of women.
To the point where women are not only second-class citizens to delusional men who pretend they're women, but we can't even be called women anymore.
They've had a list of euphemisms for us -- womb owner, egg producer, birthing person -- but now we're literally being redefined by being non-transgender.

​

This is maddening.
Language means nothing now.
This is the actual patriarchy the Left rallied against. And now they're all in for it in the name of 'trans rights.'
We are now a subset of the transgender movement.
No longer women. But non-trans.
We'll be referred to as 'non-transgender women' going forward.
And yet completely on brand for the NYT.
The same people who screamed Donald Trump would turn America into Gilead -- where women are all red-robed drones who simply make babies have been awfully silent about the actual erasure of women.



Commentary:
Oddly the use of using the term non-Transgender woman is Orwellian and continues according to most. No matter how it's being explained by psychiatrists with personal dysphorias. who now recommend mutilation our our young.
Neo-Marxist Democrats have unleashed a battle with the Dark Principalities and Powers and Wicked Forces in the heavenly realms.

"Don't you see that the whole claim NEWSPEAK is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make Thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words to express it."
George Orwell


​

The same activists stayed very, very quiet about Islam's treatment of women as less valuable than an animal. Even today they say nothing when Muslim women are mistreated.

 

[Oddball]

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'​

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with me

twitchy.com

29 Nov 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with men, which was noble, even if we disagree with some of the methods and outcomes. But the late-stage feminism, with its capitulation to the transgender agenda, has literally undone over a century of work on behalf of women.
To the point where women are not only second-class citizens to delusional men who pretend they're women, but we can't even be called women anymore.
They've had a list of euphemisms for us -- womb owner, egg producer, birthing person -- but now we're literally being redefined by being non-transgender.

​

This is maddening.
Language means nothing now.
This is the actual patriarchy the Left rallied against. And now they're all in for it in the name of 'trans rights.'
We are now a subset of the transgender movement.
No longer women. But non-trans.
We'll be referred to as 'non-transgender women' going forward.
And yet completely on brand for the NYT.
The same people who screamed Donald Trump would turn America into Gilead -- where women are all red-robed drones who simply make babies have been awfully silent about the actual erasure of women.



Commentary:
Oddly the use of using the term non-Transgender woman is Orwellian and continues according to most. No matter how it's being explained by psychiatrists with personal dysphorias. who now recommend mutilation our our young.
Neo-Marxist Democrats have unleashed a battle with the Dark Principalities and Powers and Wicked Forces in the heavenly realms.

"Don't you see that the whole claim NEWSPEAK is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make Thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words to express it."
George Orwell


​

 

[Independent thinker]

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'​

Erasure of Women Continues Apace: NY Times Now Refers to Females As 'Non-Transgender Women'

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with me

twitchy.com

29 Nov 2024 ~~ By Amy Curtis

The first- and second-wave feminist movements really just wanted women to have equal footing with men, which was noble, even if we disagree with some of the methods and outcomes. But the late-stage feminism, with its capitulation to the transgender agenda, has literally undone over a century of work on behalf of women.
To the point where women are not only second-class citizens to delusional men who pretend they're women, but we can't even be called women anymore.
They've had a list of euphemisms for us -- womb owner, egg producer, birthing person -- but now we're literally being redefined by being non-transgender.

​

This is maddening.
Language means nothing now.
This is the actual patriarchy the Left rallied against. And now they're all in for it in the name of 'trans rights.'
We are now a subset of the transgender movement.
No longer women. But non-trans.
We'll be referred to as 'non-transgender women' going forward.
And yet completely on brand for the NYT.
The same people who screamed Donald Trump would turn America into Gilead -- where women are all red-robed drones who simply make babies have been awfully silent about the actual erasure of women.



Commentary:
Oddly the use of using the term non-Transgender woman is Orwellian and continues according to most. No matter how it's being explained by psychiatrists with personal dysphorias. who now recommend mutilation our our young.
Neo-Marxist Democrats have unleashed a battle with the Dark Principalities and Powers and Wicked Forces in the heavenly realms.

"Don't you see that the whole claim NEWSPEAK is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make Thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words to express it."
George Orwell


​

What, do leftists have a think tank where they come up with this shit?

 

[SeaMajor7]

What, do leftists have a think tank where they come up with this shit?

A feel sink, probably.