No. She paid some Stanford liberal to find she may be 1.56% Indian. LOL! What a FRAUD!
The test result page does say that the person working on the sample did not know the identity of the sample donor at the time the work was done. Absent any proof otherwise, I will give them the benefit of the doubt.
However, if you read all the way down to the bottom of the report, you find this interesting segment:
"For Native American references, we used sample within the 1000 Genomes project of Native American ancestry; these samples come from Mexico, Peru, and Colombia. (It is not possible to use Native American reference sequences from inside the United States, since Native American groups within the US have not chosen to participate to participate in recent population genetics studies.)"
So she had her DNA tested to prove her tale of Native American ancestry - which has always focused on
US Native Americans - by a group whose reference samples don't actually include any US Native Americans.
And at that, her claim to "Native American" is actually about half what your average white American can claim. Hell, I'M more Native American than she is, and you don't see ME going to around claiming to be one. You certainly don't hear me telling tall tales about how "my parents had to elope to escape racism because my mother was Native American" or asking my employers to list me as Native American ethnicity.