Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

Ha ha ha.....FBI didn't see it that way.

It's not their call to make. It's the DoJ's job and they did. They charged and got convictions for seditious conspiracy, which is the planning or incitement of insurrection.
 
As they did with things like the Voting Rights Act but that requires an actual law passed by Congress. There is no current federal law that prevents States Attorney Generals from determining ballot access.
State laws do prevent a state AG from changing election laws.
 
It's not their call to make. It's the DoJ's job and they did. They charged and got convictions for seditious conspiracy, which is the planning or incitement of insurrection.
You claim those who planned it “abandoned “ their plans. How does one have an insurrection if the plan was abandoned, Simp?
 
That's because that dullard doesn't know the difference between an insurrection and a rebellion.
It was neither according to this democrat legal scholar who by the way is smarter than you.

Turley: January 6 Wasn’t Insurrection or Rebellion​


 
Can you post why Merrick Garland and Jack Smith haven't pursued this insurrection option?
Because they know that there was no insurrection to pursue. Partisan motivated opinions are not grounds for a criminal charge. They understand that.
 
Acquitted of impeachment with statements that the insurrection charges should go to court once he is out of office. Absorb that fact.
What insurrection charges? Gotta link?
 
Retard, a riot against the Congress to "stop the steal" IS an insurrection. Now even you're admitting it, though unwittingly.

face-palm-gif.278959
Nope.
 
It's not their call to make. It's the DoJ's job and they did. They charged and got convictions for seditious conspiracy, which is the planning or incitement of insurrection.
No one has been charged or convicted of planning, participating in or inciting an insurrection.

Why can’t the Democrat partisan hacks face that fact?
 
Uh, yeah...

the act or an instance of revolting esp. violently against civil or political authority or against an established government

What you described fits that definition.
That didn’t happen you moron.
 
It's not their call to make. It's the DoJ's job and they did. They charged and got convictions for seditious conspiracy, which is the planning or incitement of insurrection.
They were investigating for DOJ..........riot, no insurrection.
 
Uh, yeah...

the act or an instance of revolting esp. violently against civil or political authority or against an established government

What you described fits that definition.
And yet, not a single insurrection charge.
 
Dumbfuck, Trump was served due process in his trial.

face-palm-gif.278959
Nope. He wasn’t charged with insurrection, which is a federal crime. This kangaroo court isa civil court. Show us the civil code for insurrection.
 
You claim those who planned it “abandoned “ their plans. How does one have an insurrection if the plan was abandoned, Simp?

They abandoned their plans after breaking into the Capitol. That was the beginning of the insurrection.
 
15th post
They abandoned their plans after breaking into the Capitol. That was the beginning of the insurrection.
Must be why there were ZERO insurrection charges, Simp.
 
No one has been charged or convicted of planning, participating in or inciting an insurrection.

Why can’t the Democrat partisan hacks face that fact?

I see your problem now. Yes, some were.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom