Election Interference: Here are the Four Colorado Justices Who Voted to Exclude Donald Trump from the 2024 Ballot

[Faun]

There was no insurrection.

Copying and pasting slogans you hear on the Joy Reid show is pointless.

LOL

Understand your trolling is noted and laughed at.

 

[Hollie]

No insurrection?

How do YOU characterize what those MAGArats did on Jan 6?

I characterize your juvenile name calling as pointless.

How do you characterize an insurrection when no individuals were charged with that?

I would characterize that as buffoonish.

 

[Faun]

No insurrection?

How do YOU characterize what those MAGArats did on Jan 6?

They were just tourists, don'tcha know.

 

[Hollie]

LOL

Understand your trolling is noted and laughed at.

I thought you would retreat.

 

[Hollie]

Not in a court of law. But his actions fit the definition of providing aid or comfort to one.

Which is why your specious opinions are meaningless.

 

[Faun]

I characterize your juvenile name calling as pointless.

How do you characterize an insurrection when no individuals were charged with that?

I would characterize that as buffoonish.

How many Confederates were charged with insurrection, rebellion, sedition or treason?

 

[Faun]

I thought you would retreat.

LOL

Understand your trolling is noted and laughed at.

 

[ColonelAngus]

 

[Faun]

Which is why your specious opinions are meaningless.

LOL

Not such a specious opinion. I'm quoting the Colorado Supreme Court. Who are you quoting?

 

[Lesh]

I characterize your juvenile name calling as pointless.

How do you characterize an insurrection when no individuals were charged with that?

I would characterize that as buffoonish.

Non-responsive

I wonder why you refuse to answer…

Is it because you can’t characterize it any other way without sounding like a complete jackass?

 

[Faun]

What about that?

 

[Lesh]

Strange that no charges were brought against any individual for your imagined insurrection.

Over one thousand convictions and many for “seditious conspiracy “

Suck on that

 

[Hollie]

LOL

No such a specious opinion. I'm quoting the Colorado Supreme Court. Who are you quoting?

You can ''quote'' whomever you want. The Colorado Court never held a trial for any insurrection.

 

[BS Filter]

LOLOL

Holyfuckingshit!

Retard, you ******* replied to my post where I said how I felt about them being there.

Now you're literally admitting you're illiterate.

No, I just don't remember every post I reply to. Believe me, you're not that important to me.

 

[BS Filter]

Not in a court of law. But his actions fit the definition of providing aid or comfort to one.

That's opinion. Not enough. You and 4 Colorado justices will soon find out. Innocent until proven guilty. You silly clowns still don't get it.

 

[Hollie]

Over one thousand convictions and many for “seditious conspiracy “

Suck on that

That won't help your fraudulent claim. No charges or convictions for any nonsense claim you wish to make about insurrection


Bon appetit.

 

[Faun]

You can ''quote'' whomever you want. The Colorado Court never held a trial for any insurrection.

Because Trump was never charged with insurrection.

 

[Curried Goats]

Strange that no charges were brought against any individual for your imagined insurrection.

It's not strange that you Bingos argue in fallacies.

 

[Hollie]

Because Trump was never charged with insurrection.

Makes you look buffoonish with your frantic insurrection claims,

 

[lantern2814]

That's hysterical!!!!!! Con-sidering your FAILED insurrection.

There was no insurrection you fat retard. Period.