In your pro-terrorist organization website, it notes that only 17 per cent of the land is arable.
Didn't someone here say that Jews owned 6 per cent?
If almost all of the Jews that owned land were farmers, is it safe to assume that Jews owned a huge chunk of arable land in 48? (Figuring that Jews in cities usually couldn't own property post 1920).
Hhhmm...which only helps prove my point that Jews did not force several hundred thousand Arabs off their land and take over their farms.
Also, how many people here have BEEN to Israel? Have you seen the Negev? This whole 'percentage of land' shit is laughable. The UN partition plan was drawn around population areas...ah, if only the Arab League would've approved the Yom Kippur War border proposal.
You are throwing in a lot here that does not relate to anything I said. I had already come across antisemetic stuff Mark Twain had written which is the reason it has puzzled me that pro Israelis like to quote him. He is not a reliable source. That is clear if you read what is said and whether you like the site or not the information is sourced.
Yes, I have been to Israel over 35 years ago I worked in a Kibbutz, spent some time in Jerusalem, Tel Aviiv, Eilat and in some small bedouin villages in the desert which I cannot remember the name of. My original bias was 100% Israeli and interestingly enough it was Jews in Israel who were the first people to point out to me I was not seeing the full picture.
The issue I am concerned about here is the stubborn desire to try to pretend that Palestinians do not have more of a native right to the area than Israelis.
There are actually three Jewish sub-clusters one including Ashkenazi and Sephardi and other including Iraqi, Iranian and Caucasas Jews and a third comprising Yemeni Jews.
Remarkable, the Palestinian sub culture is located exactly in the middle of the three Jewish sub clusters, suggesting that modern Palestinians are possibly even more closely related to the ancient Hebrews than many modern Jew.
In addition any of the three Jewish sub-clusters is closer to the Palestinian sub-cluster than to the other two Jewish sub-clusters.
This implies that if one considers Ashkenazi, Sephardi, Iraqi, Iranian and Caucasas to all be part of the same Jewish people, then from a genetic point of view, the Palestinians are part of it.
- aside - Nowhere in the covenant does it say that the land was promised to the Jews but to the children of Abraham
YouTube - ‪New DNA showing Palestinians as the original Hebrews‬‏
That comes from the study spoken about here
Genetic studies bring new hope for peace between Jews and Palestinians
or you can look at an earlier study here
Epiphenom: The shared genetic heritage of Jews and Palestinians
So this is what I see. Current Palestinians are at the very centre of Jewish genetics with a closer relationship to all Jews than the different Jewish groups have to themselves. They have almost certainly been living in that area for at least 3000 years though they may have moved about. There is quite simply no way that they cannot be at the centre of all the history there.
I am trying to argue reality not get into silly arguments. It is silly to say the Palestinians weren't there. Genetics prove it. Similarly if you look at MidEastWeb you will find that they say the max number of Arabs who came in around the time Jews were immigrating was 100000 and the likelihood was that they were people who had previously been living there anyway.