Earth's Magnetic Field Is Weakening And May Be Gone By Year 3000

[james bond]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Also they have found iron particles in sedimentary rock up in the Andes, that had aligned themselves in a different direction when the earths poles were in a different position.
Magnetism in Rocks

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

 

[james bond]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Please explain.

We can see the sea floor spreading. Have an idea how quickly it happens.
All the new sea floor, closest to the rift, is magnetized in agreement with current N/S poles.
The older sea floor, further from the rift, is magnetized in the opposite orientation.
Then, a bit further away from the rift, it's back to the current orientation.

Why the differences? If the poles have always been N/S, as they are today, shouldn't the
entire sea floor have an identical orientation?

Underneath the seafloor in the mantle, heat convection is occurring all the time. It causes the cooler seafloor material to shrink and become more dense. Gravity pulls down the heavier material while the hotter earth core rises up. You're looking at the igneous layers where the magnetic orientation occurred.

 

[james bond]

If the poles reverse, can I take a selfie by pointing the lens away from me?

No, it won't be a selfie then. And the poles don't reverse. That was a mistake made by a French geologist in 1906.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Also they have found iron particles in sedimentary rock up in the Andes, that had aligned themselves in a different direction when the earths poles were in a different position.
Magnetism in Rocks

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.

Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.

The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.

Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.

When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Please explain.

We can see the sea floor spreading. Have an idea how quickly it happens.
All the new sea floor, closest to the rift, is magnetized in agreement with current N/S poles.
The older sea floor, further from the rift, is magnetized in the opposite orientation.
Then, a bit further away from the rift, it's back to the current orientation.

Why the differences? If the poles have always been N/S, as they are today, shouldn't the
entire sea floor have an identical orientation?

Underneath the seafloor in the mantle, heat convection is occurring all the time. It causes the cooler seafloor material to shrink and become more dense. Gravity pulls down the heavier material while the hotter earth core rises up. You're looking at the igneous layers where the magnetic orientation occurred.

You're looking at the igneous layers where the magnetic orientation occurred.

Yes, the seafloor layer I'm looking at will show alternating stripes that record millions of years of pole flips until, near the continents, the sea floor is subducted and remelts.

 

[expat_panama]

...we had to get all new iPhones........

not all of us--

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

...we had to get all new iPhones........

not all of us--

Of course, an iStone 6...........

 

[james bond]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Humans will be long gone by then.

What's going to happen?

Lots of possibilities, nuclear holocaust being the most likely

Unfortunately, you could be right. I'm looking at natural disasters.

 

[james bond]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Also they have found iron particles in sedimentary rock up in the Andes, that had aligned themselves in a different direction when the earths poles were in a different position.
Magnetism in Rocks

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

View attachment 192371

A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.

Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.

The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.

Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.

When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.

Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

 

[BlackFlag]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Humans will be long gone by then.

What's going to happen?

Lots of possibilities, nuclear holocaust being the most likely

Unfortunately, you could be right. I'm looking at natural disasters.

Then a comet or asteroid strike. But we'll nuke it out long before that. Someone will use a nuke, we'll survive, it will be normalized, then there will be another nuke, and so on until we end civilization in the year 2400 hundred or so (max range)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Also they have found iron particles in sedimentary rock up in the Andes, that had aligned themselves in a different direction when the earths poles were in a different position.
Magnetism in Rocks

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

View attachment 192371

A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.

Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.

The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.

Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.

When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.

Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Your thought experiment doesn't work

It does. I'm very proud of it.

The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.

Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.

Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis

I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.

instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.

 

[james bond]

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The alternating magnetic stripes on the seafloor indicate it's a lot older than that.

Also they have found iron particles in sedimentary rock up in the Andes, that had aligned themselves in a different direction when the earths poles were in a different position.
Magnetism in Rocks

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

View attachment 192371

A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.

Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.

The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.

Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.

When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.

Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Your thought experiment doesn't work

It does. I'm very proud of it.

The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.

Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.

Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis

I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.

instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.

Have you done the experiment? Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.

>>T: Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
<<

All the rows would point to magnetic N.

With that, I'll leave now ha ha.

 

[james bond]

Sure enough, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

"On 23 April 2016, unreliable web site Superstation95 reported that data gleaned from NASA revealed that Earth’s magnetosphere had “COLLAPSED” for a period of two hours:

A stunning and terrifying event has taken place in space surrounding our planet; for two hours today, earth’s “Magnetosphere” COLLAPSED around the entire planet! The magnetosphere is what protects earth from solar winds and some radiation.

This morning at 01:37:05 eastern US Time, which is 05:37:05 UTC, satellites from the NASA Space Weather Prediction Center detected a complete collapse of earth’s magnetosphere! It simply vanished for just over two hours, resuming as normal around 03:39:51 eastern US time, which is 07:39:51 UTC.

Here is how NASA Space Weather Satellites recorded the event:
"

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nasa-reports-magnetosphere-collapse/

 

[mudwhistle]

Sure enough, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

"On 23 April 2016, unreliable web site Superstation95 reported that data gleaned from NASA revealed that Earth’s magnetosphere had “COLLAPSED” for a period of two hours:

A stunning and terrifying event has taken place in space surrounding our planet; for two hours today, earth’s “Magnetosphere” COLLAPSED around the entire planet! The magnetosphere is what protects earth from solar winds and some radiation.

This morning at 01:37:05 eastern US Time, which is 05:37:05 UTC, satellites from the NASA Space Weather Prediction Center detected a complete collapse of earth’s magnetosphere! It simply vanished for just over two hours, resuming as normal around 03:39:51 eastern US time, which is 07:39:51 UTC.

Here is how NASA Space Weather Satellites recorded the event:
"

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nasa-reports-magnetosphere-collapse/

Snopes said it was a computer glitch.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000.

There is no such thing as creation science. The Earth's magnetic field is never going to disappear, until the Earth is consumed by the Sun. This is more embarrassing, demonstrably false nonsense from religious nutballs.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Humans will be long gone by then.

What's going to happen?

Scenario From a Je$u$ Salesman

The Rapture. So you better pay for the trip in advance by dropping a wad of dough at your local church, which is God's collection agency.

 

[mudwhistle]

This subject isn't one to come up daily, but could be important nevertheless. With me, it started because one of the theories given by creation scientists for a young earth is the rapid decay of earth's magnetic field. In 1883, Horace Lamb "postulated that the field was the remnant of some original event and that the decay of this field produced currents which slowed down the decay rate. He developed a rigid mathematical basis for his model using the well-known results of Michael Faraday, the principle of self-induction (inducing a current in a path of good conduction when a field is left to decay).

and

"

Afterwards, around the 1980s, Thomas Lamb was able to collect more data and he, too, predicted the potential decay of the magnetic field. All of this to back up the earth being around 6,000 years old.

The facts are the Earth's magnetic field is still weakening.

What the secular (atheist) scientists have stated is that the Earth's magnetic field is a dynamo and that we are going through a pole reversal, i.e. the magnetic N pole, which is negative, becomes positive, and the magnetic S pole becomes negative. This means the field will be weakening, but since the Earth has been around for 4.5 B years, the dynamo will generate the strength back up again. What this dynamo is and how it works isn't made clear.

I just recently discovered that the Earth's moon and Mars have lost their magnetic fields. Doesn't this mean that Earth's magnetic field isn't a dynamo? What are the differences between Earth's vs Mars vs Earth's moon? It means that I don't want to colonize the moon nor Mars.

The magnetic field protects the earth as a shield and prevents the loss of our atmosphere. It protects us from the harsh solar winds and radiation from the sun. It will likely lead to a loss of our atmosphere.

Creation scientists believe that the earth's magnetic field was given by God, has been decaying and will run out around year 3000. Others think it will last another 16,000 years or so. I don't think there's any argument about the earth's magnetic field weakening.

Evidence of Earth's magnetic field weakening. The EU launched a trio of satellites to study and track Earth's magnetic field in 2013 because they thought the magnetic field was weakening and wanted to know why.



The Earth’s Magnetic Field

Humans will be long gone by then.

What's going to happen?

Scenario From a Je$u$ Salesman

The Rapture. So you better pay for the trip in advance by dropping a wad of dough at your local church, which is God's collection agency.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Also they have found iron particles in sedimentary rock up in the Andes, that had aligned themselves in a different direction when the earths poles were in a different position.
Magnetism in Rocks

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

View attachment 192371

A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.

Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.

The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.

Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.

When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.

Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Your thought experiment doesn't work

It does. I'm very proud of it.

The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.

Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.

Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis

I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.

instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.

Have you done the experiment? Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.

>>T: Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
<<

All the rows would point to magnetic N.

With that, I'll leave now ha ha.

Have you done the experiment?

No.

Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.

If I thought it would prove something new, maybe I'd do it, but it's already well known that the poles reverse.
And that the evidence can be seen on the sea floor.

All the rows would point to magnetic N.

Why do you feel that?
Do it with one row. Mark the end of the tray deepest in the freezer N. Mark the end closest the door S.
Magnets on sponges floating in water. Freeze it.
Take it out of the freezer. Add a new row. Put it back in the freezer.
This time, put the end marked S deepest and N closest the door. After it freezes, pull it out.
The painted ends of the magnets will be in the opposite orientation in the 2nd row than in the 1st row.

 

[james bond]

Sure enough, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

"On 23 April 2016, unreliable web site Superstation95 reported that data gleaned from NASA revealed that Earth’s magnetosphere had “COLLAPSED” for a period of two hours:

A stunning and terrifying event has taken place in space surrounding our planet; for two hours today, earth’s “Magnetosphere” COLLAPSED around the entire planet! The magnetosphere is what protects earth from solar winds and some radiation.

This morning at 01:37:05 eastern US Time, which is 05:37:05 UTC, satellites from the NASA Space Weather Prediction Center detected a complete collapse of earth’s magnetosphere! It simply vanished for just over two hours, resuming as normal around 03:39:51 eastern US time, which is 07:39:51 UTC.

Here is how NASA Space Weather Satellites recorded the event:
"

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nasa-reports-magnetosphere-collapse/

Snopes said it was a computer glitch.

I agree it was a glitch. Was pointing out that the report was false.

 

[james bond]

Watch the vid in post #6. The magnets are from the earth's rocks, i.e. they act like magnetite in rocks. The poles do not have to reverse in order to get NSNS or NSSN config. Another person did it with larger rare earth magnets and the same alignment occurred. This happens in the igneous layers.

View attachment 192371

A better experiment would be to float 12 magnets on tiny sponges, like your video showed for one, in the leftmost row of this ice cube tray and while they're floating, freeze the water they're floating in.

Next, add new sponges, water and magnets in the next row, rotate the tray 180 degrees and put back in the freezer.

The original ones will stay frozen in place and the 2nd row will freeze with the opposite orientation.

Repeat a 3rd, 4th and 5th time, rotating the tray 180 degrees each time.

When you're done you'll have a pretty clear picture of what happens when the poles reverse.

Your thought experiment doesn't work. The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180. Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Your thought experiment doesn't work

It does. I'm very proud of it.

The second row would still point to magnetic N even if you rotate the tray 180.

Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.

Also, you're making the experiment fit your hypothesis

I'm making an experiment to test my hypothesis. Mine is much better than the clown you linked.

instead of fitting your hypothesis to what happens.

Ummm....you don't fit your hypothesis to what happens, you compare what happens to your hypothesis.

Have you done the experiment? Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.

>>T: Of course it points to magnetic N, that's where it was pointing when it froze.
Now if you fill the third row, put it in the freezer 180 degrees off the previous row,
when it freezes, rows 1 and 3 will point to current N, row 2 will point to current S.
<<

All the rows would point to magnetic N.

With that, I'll leave now ha ha.

Have you done the experiment?

No.

Part of the lesson of the vid was to do the experiment yourself.

If I thought it would prove something new, maybe I'd do it, but it's already well known that the poles reverse.
And that the evidence can be seen on the sea floor.

All the rows would point to magnetic N.

Why do you feel that?
Do it with one row. Mark the end of the tray deepest in the freezer N. Mark the end closest the door S.
Magnets on sponges floating in water. Freeze it.
Take it out of the freezer. Add a new row. Put it back in the freezer.
This time, put the end marked S deepest and N closest the door. After it freezes, pull it out.
The painted ends of the magnets will be in the opposite orientation in the 2nd row than in the 1st row.

You first. Age before beauty .

Here's where you can buy K&J Magnetics: Disc/Cylinder Magnets *. Next time your friends come over you can show them your superb scientific knowledge.



(* Note: I'm not promoting anything, but learning real science. I want to do some of the magnet stuff, too ).