Durham Reportedly Investigating Whether CIA Withheld Information From FBI in Russia Probe

[JoeB131]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

Wow.. That's underwealming. A bunch of agencies that really don't trust each other didn't share information? Really? This is all he has?

This is what happens when people try to mollify a man-baby in the White House.

 

[Paulie]

You people need to seriously turn off the major media. Stop reading wapo and the times. Stop watching tv news. Don’t even watch fox, they’re controlled opposition with a few decent journalistic exceptions. The only way to truly know what’s happening is to scour the internet for every little story the major media blacks out, or just simply follow Q and you’ll get all those stories neatly packaged into something that even the laziest moron can sift through. The pain is coming and the only way to assure yourself of it is to stop listening to corporate media

 

[kyzr]

Barr really needs to step down...

Your desperation is understandable.

He's an awful awful awful awful awful AG.... no one trusts him... AND RIGHTFULLY so!

WTF?? Barr is a fantastic AG in a DOJ full of swamp rat lawyers. The DOJ's double-standard is obvious.
Throw the book at Trump associates, and do not prosecute deep state conspirators.
Impanel DC grand juries that are all democrat activists. That's justice?

I am telling you------------>the very reason Mcabe was let off the hook, is because he can NOT tie the former Administration to the conspiracy. He wasn't in cabinet meetings where this stuff was discussed, and neither were Strozk or Paige. Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were!

The reason he was let off was because it was only for lying and leaking. Those aren’t big enough crimes. It would be absolutely pointless to charge someone with a crime that’s extremely hard to prove only to end up with some kind of snafu that the media can run with to say that the DOJ failed. This has to be done right and when charges come it has to be for the biggest crimes.

Follow Q.

IG Horowitz nailed McCabe's lies.
The problem that I heard was that no grand jury from DC would indict any democrat or deep stater.

 

[Paulie]

Your desperation is understandable.

He's an awful awful awful awful awful AG.... no one trusts him... AND RIGHTFULLY so!

WTF?? Barr is a fantastic AG in a DOJ full of swamp rat lawyers. The DOJ's double-standard is obvious.
Throw the book at Trump associates, and do not prosecute deep state conspirators.
Impanel DC grand juries that are all democrat activists. That's justice?

I am telling you------------>the very reason Mcabe was let off the hook, is because he can NOT tie the former Administration to the conspiracy. He wasn't in cabinet meetings where this stuff was discussed, and neither were Strozk or Paige. Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were!

The reason he was let off was because it was only for lying and leaking. Those aren’t big enough crimes. It would be absolutely pointless to charge someone with a crime that’s extremely hard to prove only to end up with some kind of snafu that the media can run with to say that the DOJ failed. This has to be done right and when charges come it has to be for the biggest crimes.

Follow Q.

IG Horowitz nailed McCabe's lies.
The problem that I heard was that no grand jury from DC would indict any democrat or deep stater.

You “heard”? Where did you hear that? The major media? Fox News? You need to follow Q. There are almost 150,000 sealed indictments waiting for declassification. Huge crimes. Crimes against humanity. Treason. Sedition. McCabe is a small fish in this whole thing. It’s also possible McCabe flipped and is states evidence now. But regardless, this whole thought that nothing is happening is absurd. There is SO MUCH that is happening and if you follow Q you’ll see all of it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why in the blue hell do you care when you’re a one legged old Canadian Socialist? I will Not debate our politics with a hateful foreigner with a gimpy knee.

Awe. You poor little snowflake. You won't debate me because I rip apart your lies, back up my post with honest, reputable sources, and destroy propaganda on a daily basis.

You hate truth tellers and those who aren't gullible enough to buy the bullshit you're selling. Liars and crooks always hate to be exposed.

My lies? You gimpy fat liar with bad knees. You accused me of saying something I never said and then ran like the coward that you are. You’re not an American and you cannot even admit your own lie. No need for me to debate fat liars with bad knees. Enjoy your freezing country.

Angry, bitter and vengeful. The conservative male trifecta. Like I said, you can't get ahead when you spend all of your time getting even. That's why Trump keeps going broke. He wastes time and money pursuing vendettas, and law suits and things that really don't make you money, just so he can saw he beat somebody down.

One of our bigtime construction contractors got stiffed for $75,000 by one of his general contractors. In the construction industry most of your profit is in that final payment, so that meant the company owner would make little to nothing on that contract. We recommended that we lien the property to force them to pay but our client refused. He said the amount of time and money he would waste pursuing that payment wouldn't be worth it. He could make more money by spending that time pursuing other contracts. Trump is the guy who spent all of his time in court, stiffing sub-trades and fighting off creditors, when he could have been building and selling more properties.

It took the Trump Company 10 years to build Trump Tower Toronto. Any other big building in Toronto was built and occupied in under two years from the date it was announced. It's hardly surprising it went bankrupt not long after it open. Rife with mismanagement, another wonderful Trump Corporation business failure.

For the record. I'm neither fat, nor gimpy. I'm healthy, active, and at age 70, I'm not on any medications at all. My mother is still living, so I expect I'll be around a few years more. And quite frankly, the less mobile I am, the more likely you'll find me online. It's winter, and I've had a cold and I'm not going out, nor are friends coming over. I'm just here, with my cold medications, and my Kleenex box. Imagine how annoying I'll be when I can't get out at all.

You'd better pray for my continued good health a$$hat.

Did you or did you not lie? Do not skirt the issue. How can we have an honest debate when you began it with a lie? You’re old, fat and ugly. You worry about politics of a country you do not live in and you’re a liar. Your life has been a failure.

Boy, you're really triggered here. Misogynistic abuse is always so entertaining.

Triggered? You’re the one who blatantly lied. Will you admit that? Yes or no?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Again, the Canadian opines and trashes our country. Limp around Canada and leave us alone. Weirdo

I feel like we should stomp the shit out of Canada and seize their oil and gas, probably only take 2-3 days.

You mean hours?

 

[Dragonlady]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

 

[The Purge]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

 

[White 6]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

Probably be another nothing burger.

 

[bripat9643]

Considering the Donald Trump stood side-by-side with Vladimir Putin and when Vladimir Putin was asked did you help Donald Trump get elected president, he said “yes, yes I did“

and when Donald Trump was asked if he believes Vladimir Putin or all of our US intelligence agencies and in front of the entire world he said I believe Vladimir Putin thereby telling the entire world that you can trust Russia and you can believe Russia but don’t believe the United States. The United States is not trustworthy.

so how does this help our national security?
It doesn’t. It makes the United States weaker. Thanks Trump. And thanks Republican base for making someone this treacherous our president.

View attachment 306696

He was asked no such question and gave no such answer.

In short, you're a lying douchebag.

Trump is right: you can trust the FSB a lot more than you can trust the FBI or the CIA. The later two attempted a coup against their own president.

 

[Dragonlady]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

Republicans always say they believe Hillary did this or that but they can never find any evidence of it. Chuck Grassley was certain that Jim Comey let Hillary off and spent a year investigating Hillary's emails, releasing a report that completely exonerated Hillary, after he looked at the evidence.

William Barr has said that he believed the Trump Campaign was spied on, and there has literally been no evidence found to support that belief.

Republicans believe a lot of things about Democrats and never produce any evidence. It's kind of their Standard Operating Procedure.

Republicans always start investigations with "We believe" and then they go looking for proof of their beliefs. Demcrats start every investigation with "We have evidence that". This is why Republicans go to jail, and Democrats don't.

 

[White 6]

Considering the Donald Trump stood side-by-side with Vladimir Putin and when Vladimir Putin was asked did you help Donald Trump get elected president, he said “yes, yes I did“

and when Donald Trump was asked if he believes Vladimir Putin or all of our US intelligence agencies and in front of the entire world he said I believe Vladimir Putin thereby telling the entire world that you can trust Russia and you can believe Russia but don’t believe the United States. The United States is not trustworthy.

so how does this help our national security?
It doesn’t. It makes the United States weaker. Thanks Trump. And thanks Republican base for making someone this treacherous our president.

View attachment 306696

He was asked no such question and gave no such answer.

In short, you're a lying douchebag.

Trump is right: you can trust the FSB a lot more than you can trust the FBI or the CIA. The later two attempted a coup against their own president.

Russian Speakers Explain What Putin Actually Said About Trump
According to The Atlantic, he pretty much did. The Reuters reporter Jeff Mason asked, “President Putin, did you want President Trump to win the election and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that?” If you listen to the English translation that was broadcast during the press conference, the Russian leader said, “Yes, I did. Yes, I did. Putin roughly said, “Yes, I wanted him to win, because he talked about the normalization of Russian–American relations.” Putin is publicly admitting, in the clearest form yet, that he wanted Trump to beat Hillary Clinton during the U.S. presidential campaign
As a U.S. intelligence report released in 2017 concluded, “Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump” over the course of the campaign, aspiring to “help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him” while focusing its “influence campaign” on “undermining [Clinton’s] expected presidency” when “it appeared to Moscow that Secretary Clinton was likely to win the election.”

So Putin wanted Trump to win and indeed helped him win. Look, if you want your Russian backed leader, you can keep your Russian back leader, but don't expect the rest of the country or the free world to believe your BS. You need to come back into the light and support American democracy not Kremlin crony politics.

 

[Dragonlady]

Considering the Donald Trump stood side-by-side with Vladimir Putin and when Vladimir Putin was asked did you help Donald Trump get elected president, he said “yes, yes I did“

and when Donald Trump was asked if he believes Vladimir Putin or all of our US intelligence agencies and in front of the entire world he said I believe Vladimir Putin thereby telling the entire world that you can trust Russia and you can believe Russia but don’t believe the United States. The United States is not trustworthy.

so how does this help our national security?
It doesn’t. It makes the United States weaker. Thanks Trump. And thanks Republican base for making someone this treacherous our president.

View attachment 306696

He was asked no such question and gave no such answer.

In short, you're a lying douchebag.

Trump is right: you can trust the FSB a lot more than you can trust the FBI or the CIA. The later two attempted a coup against their own president.

I love it when you deny something that I watched happen

 

[bripat9643]

Considering the Donald Trump stood side-by-side with Vladimir Putin and when Vladimir Putin was asked did you help Donald Trump get elected president, he said “yes, yes I did“

and when Donald Trump was asked if he believes Vladimir Putin or all of our US intelligence agencies and in front of the entire world he said I believe Vladimir Putin thereby telling the entire world that you can trust Russia and you can believe Russia but don’t believe the United States. The United States is not trustworthy.

so how does this help our national security?
It doesn’t. It makes the United States weaker. Thanks Trump. And thanks Republican base for making someone this treacherous our president.

View attachment 306696

He was asked no such question and gave no such answer.

In short, you're a lying douchebag.

Trump is right: you can trust the FSB a lot more than you can trust the FBI or the CIA. The later two attempted a coup against their own president.

I love it when you deny something that I watched happen

I also watched it, dingbat. Putin was not asked of he help Trump get elected, and he certainly didn't say he did.

 

[Dragonlady]

Considering the Donald Trump stood side-by-side with Vladimir Putin and when Vladimir Putin was asked did you help Donald Trump get elected president, he said “yes, yes I did“

and when Donald Trump was asked if he believes Vladimir Putin or all of our US intelligence agencies and in front of the entire world he said I believe Vladimir Putin thereby telling the entire world that you can trust Russia and you can believe Russia but don’t believe the United States. The United States is not trustworthy.

so how does this help our national security?
It doesn’t. It makes the United States weaker. Thanks Trump. And thanks Republican base for making someone this treacherous our president.

View attachment 306696

He was asked no such question and gave no such answer.

In short, you're a lying douchebag.

Trump is right: you can trust the FSB a lot more than you can trust the FBI or the CIA. The later two attempted a coup against their own president.

I love it when you deny something that I watched happen

I also watched it, dingbat. Putin was not asked of he help Trump get elected, and he certainly didn't say he did.

Reporter: Did you order your people to help Trump?

Putin: Yes, yes I did.

 

[bripat9643]

Considering the Donald Trump stood side-by-side with Vladimir Putin and when Vladimir Putin was asked did you help Donald Trump get elected president, he said “yes, yes I did“

and when Donald Trump was asked if he believes Vladimir Putin or all of our US intelligence agencies and in front of the entire world he said I believe Vladimir Putin thereby telling the entire world that you can trust Russia and you can believe Russia but don’t believe the United States. The United States is not trustworthy.

so how does this help our national security?
It doesn’t. It makes the United States weaker. Thanks Trump. And thanks Republican base for making someone this treacherous our president.

View attachment 306696

He was asked no such question and gave no such answer.

In short, you're a lying douchebag.

Trump is right: you can trust the FSB a lot more than you can trust the FBI or the CIA. The later two attempted a coup against their own president.

I love it when you deny something that I watched happen

I also watched it, dingbat. Putin was not asked of he help Trump get elected, and he certainly didn't say he did.

Reporter: Did you order your people to help Trump?

Putin: Yes, yes I did.

Nope. That isn't wasn't what was asked or said.

 

[Paulie]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

It’s a complete waste of time trying to reason with these people. I know it’s tough because we just want something we can rub their faces in but it doesn’t come that easy. Patience. And if patience doesn’t work then we always have the 2nd amendment.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

It’s a complete waste of time trying to reason with these people. I know it’s tough because we just want something we can rub their faces in but it doesn’t come that easy. Patience. And if patience doesn’t work then we always have the 2nd amendment.

You are kidding right? I have been more than civil but when people like DragonLady spread blatant lies then I will call her out especially when they are about me. If I started telling people on this site that you believe Jews are responsible for cancer and you never actually said that, would you be OK with that?

 

[kyzr]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

This is proof positive that Durham's investigation has found NOTHING and has no charges to file on anyone. Now he's grasping at straws because everything else has failed.

Incidentally, as for wanting to talk to Brennan - he said on TV last night that he'd sit down with Durham any where, any time. He has nothing to hide.

But why all these people are prepared to sacrifice their professional careers and reputations, and violate their oaths of office on the alter of Trump's ego is beyond me.

Lying sack of shit!...
You LIE. even when the headlines say you lie!!

Mr. Horowitz had found that the F.B.I. acted appropriately in opening the inquiry in 2016 into whether the Trump campaign wittingly or unwittingly helped Russia influence the election in Donald J. Trump’s favor. In response, Mr. Durham, whose report is not expected to be complete for months, released a caveat-laden rebuttal: “Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the inspector general that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the F.B.I. case was opened.”

Yes, that's what Durham has said he believed, but he didn't say he had evidence to prove it. Nor has he provided any evidence to prove. This is the problem when Republicans investigate their "enemies". They start with the conclusion, and then search for evidence to support it. And when they fail to find the evidence they accuse others of covering it up.

Sensible people wait until someone does something stupid, like enthusictically embrace assistance from the Russian government in an election campaign, and invite them to do more, or brag about having access to Hillary's stolen emails in a public bar in front of a bunch of foreign embassy staffers, and say "What the hell is going on here?" and question such behaviour.

And those questions are reasonable. The FBI didn't publicize the investigation, like they did with Hillary's emails, and Mueller did say that Trump didn't criminally conspire with the Russians, but only because the Russians considered the campaign to be too chaotic and utterly incapable of not getting caught and didn't want to create any kind of record of their dealings with these clowns. That's hardly a ringing endorsement of the Trump Campaign's behaviour.

But the campaign was run by a ragtag bunch of crooks (Manafort), liars (all of them), and opportunists (Page, Guliani) and star fuckers (Papadopolous), that many of them committed multiple felonies trying to cover up this non-conspiracy, and a whole range of Trumpian crimes were uncovered in the investigation.

This is how a real crime family operates. The Clintons and most Democrats understand that in Washington, someone is always watching, always listening, and you keep your nose clean or the other side is going to be launching investigations.

But Republican Administrations since Nixon, keep flouting the law and getting caught violated the Constitution, profitting off the taxpayers, all while claiming that they're the moral party, and the Democrats are corrupt.

After Watergate, after Iran Contra, W's wars of profit, after everything that Trump has done since before the election. The Republican Party put yet another criminal into the White House and they refuse to hold him accountable.

So the American voters will. In Spades.

Dingbat. If he believed it and he's investigating it, most probable he has evidence or wouldn't have said shit!!!

Republicans always say they believe Hillary did this or that but they can never find any evidence of it. Chuck Grassley was certain that Jim Comey let Hillary off and spent a year investigating Hillary's emails, releasing a report that completely exonerated Hillary, after he looked at the evidence.

William Barr has said that he believed the Trump Campaign was spied on, and there has literally been no evidence found to support that belief.

Republicans believe a lot of things about Democrats and never produce any evidence. It's kind of their Standard Operating Procedure.

Republicans always start investigations with "We believe" and then they go looking for proof of their beliefs. Demcrats start every investigation with "We have evidence that". This is why Republicans go to jail, and Democrats don't.

OMG, the Mueller Investigation started off looking at Russian interference and morphed into the Russia Collusion hoax, with 2-years of the MSM bullshit that Trump is a Russian asset. Get real.
The Horowitz IG report nailed the FBI with falsifying evidence to spy on Trump.
The NSA has evidence that they were illegally spying on Trump.
The chit will hit the fan, the only question is how high up in the Obama admin the indictments will go.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

U.S. Attorney John Durham, tasked to look into the origins of the FBI’s “Crossfire Hurricane” investigation, is now “investigating CIA resistance to sharing Russian secrets,” according to a Feb. 13 report in The New York Times.

According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Additionally, Durham is reportedly looking into “whether and how information from foreign governments or the C.I.A. played any role in stoking suspicions at the F.B.I. about Trump campaign links to Russia.”

It had previously been reported that Durham was expected to seek an interview with Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, following an expansion of his investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...

------------

“According to the article, “Durham appears to be pursuing a theory that the C.I.A., under its former Director John O. Brennan, had a preconceived notion about Russia or was trying to get to a particular result—and was nefariously trying to keep other agencies from seeing the full picture lest they interfere with that goal.”

Brennan is going to prison. IMO

That Commie/Muslim/Globalist/America Hater bastard should be the first up the gallows steps.

Hell, we waited almost 3 years for Mueller, let's hope this is less time and had the results that the investigation deserves to uncover!

Obama turned the FBI into the Corrupt Democratic Party's secret police.
Look at how they acted when they arrested Stone and Flynn.
That was just one step away from political opponents disappearing in the middle of the night.