How predictable is it that all of the recent special interest funded ''polling'' has the two better candidates at the bottom of their so-called rankings and all of the authoritarian posers on top of their coercive sales pitch?
It's like what the Republicans and the cable news entertainment programming got together and did to Ron Paul all over again.
lol...
"data is the new oil. . . "
For the past decade, I have refused to answer pollsters, unless, of course, they are willing to pay me.
OTH? Because of the way the
Commission on Presidential Debates operates? I have, made an exception this year, for the first time since Paul ran.
I'm not saying I necessarily would, or will vote for RFK, but, in comparison, he seems more sane. I'd just like to see him challenge the other two.
So. . . I agreed to a pollster's call.
And wouldn't you know it, five minutes into the poll, they did not even give me his name as one of the choices, even though I know, he is sitting at somewhere around 20% in most polls. wtf?
. . . and of course, if RFKjr. wasn't mentioned in the pollsters questioning? Chase Oliver? Cornel West? Jill Stein? Just forget about it.
Then I asked the pollster, who is paying for this poll? She claimed not to know?

She was just a "hired hand."
I need no more evidence of the system being rigged, then first hand experience of it.