This isn’t a ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ issue.
And yet again: as a private entity A&E is at liberty to do as it sees fit to protect its interests, placing a cast member on hiatus ‘violates’ no free speech; and the private citizen viewers are at liberty to stop watching A&E if they disagree with the network’s decision.
Well then, lets shift the debate over to why a broadcast company feels the need to drop someone in a heartbeat due to a personal statement, that in no way threatens anyone, does not call for harm to be done to anyone, and at the end of the day does no real harm to anyone.
We have come to a point where one side of the political debate is given all sorts of leeway, and when they cross the line it takes a massive outswelling of outrage to even get them a slap on the wrist. On the other hand, someone on the "wrong" side of the debate is an instant target for the "butthurt group of the week's" media campaign to silence them via economic assault.
We have come to the point where if you offend the wrong 1% of the population you are ostracised without due process, and usually without being able to defend yourself.
Considering something "offensive" when it really only offends a small vocal minority may not be censorship, but it sure as hell isnt justice.