Driver Plows Through Crowd in New Orleans

ISIS doesn't exist without the CIA.

ceb06537a75a143d7d263e73a0e382e6.jpg

Do you have a link?
 
The CIA also engineered the decades-long shit show in Iran.

Shit like this going on for decades and decades, after clearly knowing what we're dealing with in the region, doesn't just occur by happenstance.

Carter should have supported the Shah of Iran. Do you see a trend here? Carter and Obama (ISIS) both let Islamists get out of hand.
 
Obama let ISIS drive across Iraq putting village after village to the sword (and rape sprees) in long convoys of
white Toyota pickup trucks. Trump later bombed the shit out of ISIS.
Trump also killed General Soleimani who had put ISIS on the run in Iraq then stole the oil in Syria under the pretext of fighting ISIS, if he had wanted to fight ISIS he would have supported Assad and the Russians, he didn't, by the way not sure which franchise provided all those brand new Toyota trucks?
 
Why after years without doing anything has a ISIL sympathizer recently attacked New Orleans

In your myriad examples of how muslims are so accepting and peaceful, you keep asking that question, and obviously you think you have an answer, so why don't you enlighten us all as to what you think the real reason is?
 
Trump also killed General Soleimani who had put ISIS on the run in Iraq then stole the oil in Syria under the pretext of fighting ISIS, if he had wanted to fight ISIS he would have supported Assad and the Russians, he didn't, by the way not sure which franchise provided all those brand new Toyota trucks?

Good! Iran is a major supporter of Islamic terrorism. Are you sad that General Soleimani is dead?
 
Carter should have supported the Shah of Iran. Do you see a trend here? Carter and Obama (ISIS) both let Islamists get out of hand.
Why should carter have supported a Dictator in Iran who had been killing his own people on the streets and torturing them?
 
ISIS doesn't exist without the CIA.

ceb06537a75a143d7d263e73a0e382e6.jpg

They may have created them for a specific purpose, do you believe they continue to support and fund them in their current effort today?
 
Using one adversary to fight another adversary is as old as the hills. Reagan helped Saddam fight Iran.

Exactly. They were funded and trained at the beginning for a different purpose, yet that somehow excuses what they have become and what their actions are today, it's mindboggling.
 
It is and not just recently you have jackbooted all over the middle east killing and destroying it's pissed some people off, then you decided to employ them to do your dirty work like many they probably had a price, the head chopper now ruling Syria was in Abu Ghraib the US probably turned the guy then turned him loose to attack Syria we just saw the result.

Muslims invaded Europe multiple times and were stopped in Spain, France, and Austria. When the Soviet Union collapsed, totalitarian socialism's power in the Middle East declined and Islam filled the vacuum.

This was all predicted by the brilliant book:

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order Paperback – August 2, 2011
by Samuel P. Huntington (Author)

Have you read it?
 
Why should carter have supported a Dictator in Iran who had been killing his own people on the streets and torturing them?

To prevent even worse Muslim dictators from killing even more people in Iran and elsewhere.
 
Muslims invaded Europe multiple times and were stopped in Spain, France, and Austria. When the Soviet Union collapsed, totalitarian socialism's power in the Middle East declined and Islam filled the vacuum.

This was all predicted by the brilliant book:

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order Paperback – August 2, 2011
by Samuel P. Huntington (Author)

Have you read it?
No i have not read it because i don't look back to the Crusades like you do going off your Avitar.
 
You have to be careful in listening to and more importantly assigning value to any news reports. There are no real journalists today, or very few, and the few wire services get their "news" from state services. Word for word. Flag, no flag. Isis, no Isis. Lone nut, multiple nuts. Mastermind terrerrist, dumb ass. Create confusion and make people take sides right from the start. If you ask questions, people will call you a conspiracy theorist, that you are saying "nothing happened". Obviously things do happen, but it's the way it is packaged for the news that does the work. What is at stake here? New administration, maybe support for foreign war against our terrerrist enemies? Chatter about reforming the DHS and FBI and CIA? Create more hate against Muslims and Palestinians? Hitting the debt ceiling again and need more money for "security"? Realize that you know absolutely nothing except what the screen tells you, and I hope you have more faith in the system than I do at the moment.

Are you implying this guy was paid or otherwise influenced to off himself in a bogus terrorist attack in order to cause a false flag against muslims?
 
Biden has the blood of those killed on his hands, he has been supporting Al Qaeda in Syria for years.

Are you saying that Al Qaeda would be nice, peaceful muslims if Biden didn't 'support' them?
 
To prevent even worse Muslim dictators from killing even more people in Iran and elsewhere.
What do you base that crap on are you a mind reader?


It's a long list. Pull up a chair.
It's a long list of bullshit, all those groups you name have one thing in common, they all resist Zionist terror, Hezbollah didn't even exist before the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982, they were formed to resist that invasion, the biggest sponsor of global terrorism is the US by a mile.
 
I am amused by people who think Muslim aggression/terrorism is a result of recent US foreign policy.




"In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:



It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.[22]"



Yes, this is what is so frustrating, let's just excuse their behavior because they were once funded or trained by outside forces at a different time for a different purpose, as if that is the only reason behind what they are currently doing today. Poor little muslims, if only they had been treated right 30, 40, 50 years ago, there wouldn't be all of this bloodshed today. If only they weren't supported and encouraged by 'global' forces to perpetuate their jihad, they'd be a peaceful and prosperous people today. It's both ridiculous and preposterous.
 
Trump also killed General Soleimani who had put ISIS on the run in Iraq then stole the oil in Syria under the pretext of fighting ISIS, if he had wanted to fight ISIS he would have supported Assad and the Russians, he didn't, by the way not sure which franchise provided all those brand new Toyota trucks?
But he did support Assad...It's the neocons who conned Trump out of full withdrawal form Syria -and who very likely engineered the false flag gas attacks- who want to keep the war going forever.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom