MikeK, drive through poor neighborhoods in Cleveland, Detroit, Boston, Buffalo, etc. and then repeat that claim. It just don't hold water.
Born poor and black? The odds are overwhelming that will never change.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/08/books/review/Ford-t.html
You know I love you Maddie, but I disagree here. The odds that black kids will be born is of course correct. I don't buy that it is inevitable that they will be born mostly poor . . . UNLESS . . . we continue social policies that treat black people as separate from the mainstream, as objects to be condescended to and patronized because they won't have the chance otherwise, and/or treat black people as inferiors with the assumption that they can't survive or be 'equal' without '******'s' help.
When we make room to make the brass ring accessible to ALL our citizens and then expect them to take the initiative to reach for it, we will see dramatic improvement. Handing them the ring isn't going to ever get them further on down the road.
When we return to traditional American values in which we see and encourage traditional marriage and the two parent family as the norm, we will see most child poverty essentially eliminated. And though many single parents are doing great jobs holding their families together, we won't achieve that by thinking it is somehow virtuous or enlightened to see fathers as unimportant.
And part of the solution is to start accepting people as they are and what they are and not giving hateful words like the "n" word any more power than any other hateful, ugly euphemism or insult by which we describe people. In that sense, I think Dr. Laura was right.