Donna is making more of an ass of herself the more she "spills". She should have thought about all this crap when she herself was doing it WITH them.
Donna Brazile like just about every other democrat is a pathological liar. But for some reason she felt the Crooked Hillary establishment did not pay enough for her lying on Crooked Hillary's behalf so she flipped like an underworld mobster looking for a break. She did not answer any question Tucker asked her, and Tucker was laughing at her the entire time, and let her hawk her book. Donna Brazile was like in boxing promoter Don King mode, deranged, crazy, and looking for revenge money.
No honor among thieves. Someone in the DNC pissed her off, and now they are "gonna pay" in some form or another by golly. What an idiot she is for not realizing most see her as such.
Seriously? Both of you truly would rather focus your remarks on Ms. Brazile and not on what she has to say? "Shooting the messenger" is just as invalid a thing to do when the messenger chides one's own "darling" as when the messenger chides one's opponents. Using that
ad hominem attack is all the more absurd when it's clear the messenger is and was well positioned to know exactly what they're talking about and one has presented nary a shred to show that is not the case, which is what one must do for the exception to the fallaciousness of the "shoot the messenger' attack to be valid.
Countless Democrats have of Ms. Brazile's comments essentially said "yes, that happened, and we've got to fix it and do better," yet here you are attacking her. Why are those highly placed Democrats saying that? Because they at least have the integrity to "own their sh*t" even though doing so is painful. That's not to say they exhibit the expected degrees of integrity overall, but the bit they've shown in that regard is more than we typically see.
And let's be honest...If one is going to undergo a cathartic airing of one's "dirty linen," the time to do it is while one does not hold the reigns of power because upon gaining power, the scrutiny to which all one does becomes subject is immense. Better, if I may mix metaphors, to have already done and folded the wash and mourned and buried the skeletons, for to do otherwise is to become immobilized by the real and imagined scandals pertaining to them. One (a party) can regain power having those things in one's past, but only if one can, upon retaking it, also say to inquires about such things, "Asked and answered; read the papers. Next topic," and have that be a legit response because there literally nothing else to say, because it's all long since been laid bare.
