To hear Liberals speak, for example, Trump is the criminal Satan incarnate...even though he has never left 4 Americans dead due to incompetence, lied about it, and / or endangered our national security - even by accident - as Hillary has. The man is just as much an egotistical narcissist who doesn't care what others think and says/does what he wants as Obama yet liberals attack him for being that way while giving Obama a pass.
Guy, you've had EIGHT congressional hearing on BENGHAZI!!!!!!! trying to prove your supposed point. And all eight times, you've failed to prove any of your crazy accusations.
As for Trump, the biggest people complaining about him are Faux News and the National Re-Jew. Maybe you need to ask yourself why that is.
Rather than judge everyone equally the politicians have people, especially liberals in this case regarding Hillary, arguing over whose politicians are LESS CROOKED, to the point where they are willing to suspend reality and fact to claim their candidate is faultless of anything and everything...at least in their partisan minds.
I think it's more a case of the Boy Who Cried Wolf. You guys have been making accusations about Hillary Clinton since 1992. You've spent hundreds of millions of dollars investigating her. Whitewater, Vince Foster, Travel Office, FBI Files, BENGHAZI!!!!!! and now this bullshit. There's a certain point where sensible people listen to the same clowns on the right making vicious accusations and hysterical claims, and we just don't believe there's a wolf there anymore.
In the last election liberals drummed up false accusations against Herman Cain about potential sexual harassment and adultery. The same defensive arguments they used to defend Bill Clinton were not afforded to Cain...because he was a Republican. No liberal said he was innocent until proven guilty - they demanded he pull out of the race. As soon as he did all of his accusers disappeared, and we heard no more about Cain.
actually, I don't think any Liberals other than Gloria "Pay attention to me" Allred said much of anything about Cain. Cain, who was never a serious candidate, just someone trying to raise his profile on the Hate Radio Circuit, only got increased scrutiny because as your side was flopping all over trying to find a "Not Romney" to support, he finally got his turn.
There were plenty of Republicans who got bigger passes on their sexual misconduct than Bill Clinton got. David Vitter comes to mind. His sex life involved hiring prostitutes, which is a crime. But he got up there and praised Jesus with his mortified wife at his side, and most of us said, "Whatever, dude!"
In this election we gave a candidate under FBI investigation for crimes under the Espionage Act and for corruption...and instead of demanding they step down liberals are defending their candidates like they would defend no republican in the same situation. Putting 1 person or 1 party so unequally ahead of another ... OR the country ... is part of the cancer that has infected this country.
Quite the contrary. We all found out that Colin Powell had done pretty much the same thing, and even though there was a MUCH MORE serious question, like how did we go to war over weapons that didn't exist and kill 100,000 people, no one really thought there was a big conspiracy that he had his own server or didn't retain all of his e-mails.
Now, I think there are a lot of GOOD reasons to not vote for Mrs. Clinton. Her "College for all" plan is unworkable, unneeded and unaffordable. She drinks from the same "Free Trade Koolaid" the rest of the Washington Establishment does.
But "She didn't use the right e-mail server and information in emails she got were classified after she got them by arbitrary rules" aren't amongst them.
