Well some tank like you say have often symbolic name on it...Trump déserve it.
Oh yes- if Trump was in charge of tanks there is no doubt he would believe he deserved having his name first and foremost on the tanks.
Well yes, you don't have enough of this no good Obama this Président who does some war in Syria but not completly just in half ( no troop on the ground ) and leave the people deal with there lost and the fear ? that better for you ?
Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat. But suddenly progressives are for unnecessary wars, they have to pretend they care about some oppressed Muslims. Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.
The policy for the Middle East should be to stay out of Muslim countries and let them handle their own affairs. Let them kill each other, that's what they are best at. If they also attack the US or allies, then bomb the hell out of them and don't apologize for it. If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did.
Syria is a quagmire because of Obama. They never attacked us nor were they ever a threat.
President Obama didn't make the citizens of Syria revolt. The revolution happened- started off peacefully and then after the troops of Assad attacked the protesters it turned violent.
As far as Syria 'never attacking us or ever a threat'- Syria was- and is a sponsor of terrorism. Syria has sponsored anti-Israeli terrorists for decades- Syria was designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 1979.
Chapter 3 -- State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview
Cuba, Iran, and Syria, however, have not renounced terrorism or made efforts to act against Foreign Terrorist Organizations. Iran and Syria routinely provided safe haven, substantial resources, and guidance to terrorist organizations.
I understand- you think the United States shouldn't act against states who sponsor terrorism
. This state however was both a threat to our ally, Israel, and was barrel bombing its own citizens. If we had not been involved, Syria might have had more time to help terrorists attack Western targets
Thing is all Muslims live oppressed lives because that's what they crave, subjugation to the will of Allah....in other words the government run by Islamists.
Yet we have example after example from the last 60 years of Muslims revolting against dictators.
If we go in, take the oil and keep it, instead of giving it away like Bush did
So you think the United States should just use our military power to steal oil- and then keep our troops in the Middle East guarding oil fields with big targets on their backs?
It's irrelevant if the Syrian people revolted against the Syrian government. What business is it of ours? None.
If we attacked Syria because they are a "state sponsor" of terrorism, then why didn't we attack Iran, as well as every other terror sponsor out there? Why not the actual terror group they sponsor? That's the lamest excuse I've heard yet.
Since Obama decided to fund the Sunni side of the rebellion, he is in fact fueling ISIS, since they are Sunni. The mess also created the Syrian refugee crisis, which has created an even bigger terror threat to the West. Only it is not the Shi'ite backed terror groups that you claim are a big threat to the West, but Sunni nutjobs, the ones we're "helping". It's also not just a "threat" of terrorism, there have been so many Sunni terror attacks in Europe and even in the states, it's now the new normal for attacks to happen on a monthly basis.
By all means, please provide examples of Muslims revolting against a dictator, and implementing some kind of real democracy that isn't as oppressive as any of the dictatorships.
I think the US military should stay out of Middle East affairs, unless we are attacked or there is a real threat. Then if we wage war, we don't do it half assed like a Bush and Obama. Destroy them, take their source of funding (oil), and forget any nation building shit or patrolling their streets like policemen. So no, they wouldn't have a target on them.
