Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 69,480
- 59,412
- 3,615
No, it isn'tThe point being that passing a LAW that says you must post a document claiming there is ONE AND ONLY ONE GOD is unconstitutional
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it isn'tThe point being that passing a LAW that says you must post a document claiming there is ONE AND ONLY ONE GOD is unconstitutional
Wrong as always. As you will soon see.No, it isn't
SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Interesting
Does California TEACH Islam or only allow private prayer?
I'm right, as always.Wrong as always. As you will soon see.
ElementaryYou won't answer because you do not have the answer. And FYI, there is no god. Never has been, never will be. Just fools gulible enough to believe in myths and rumors.
That's why it's private prayer. Try to follow.SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You failed to prove it wrong, Simp.You believe the New York Post???
.
Show me where the phrase is used in the U.S. Constitution.SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Apparently you should never be a lawyer....it's called "stealing of affection" and is usually given juries the license to grant huge sums to husband's.Sure. Lying is illegal in some very specific circumstances. Like inflating the value of your assets on a loan application. I grant you that.
Cheating on your wife isn’t illegal. She can also divorce you and get alimony without cheating, so it’s not really exclusive. Her husband is not entitled to anything from the man she cheated on. That’s super weird and treats wives more like property than people.
Our laws aren’t a moral code. They’re the bare minimum to maintain a functional society. The Ten Commandments are not compatible with our concept of freedom.
*as a short sighted atheist with tunnel visionAs an atheist, I see nothing to fear from schools teaching the Ten Commandments.
I have asked the same question. I'm mocking the hypocrite.Show me where the phrase is used in the U.S. Constitution.
The Constitution was designed so that the people, via their elected representatives, govern themselves, establish what rules/law are necessary and what are not, determine what sort of societies they will be and what quality of life means to them.True, We have been influenced when one group gets enough power they use it,
with out regard for how any one else feels about it.
Your rights end where another individual's rights begin.Explain what Any OF those things you posted have to do with OUR rights as AMERICANS.
The Constitution was established to form a secular government and a secular code for that government. The new nation realized the problem with the Church of England also being the State of England.The Constitution was designed so that the people themselves, via their elected representatives, govern themselves, establish what rules/law are necessary and what are not, determine what sort of societies they will be and what quality of life means to them.
Do you believe that setting up ANY one group to have the ability to DICTATE how the WHOLE country should think or act IS GOOD?Sure, let’s look at that:
I agree with this 100%. All laws made in pursuance (carrying out the plan of) the constitution are the supreme law of the land.
This means any law made that is within the scope of the cotus is the law of the land and takes priority over the states.
So then:
You have this:
What this is saying is that, any law that Congress can make that is authorized for them to make, in the supreme law of the land. What is authorized? Those things that are delegated for Congress to do
I know you all want to think that the federal government has supreme authority in all things, but it just isn’t so…we as citizens have let government get way too big and way too powerful that they have nearly become a dictatorial body. And then dems come along and want to give them MORE power
The federal government was never supposed to be what it is today
EXPLAIN?Your rights end where another individual's rights begin.
Never heard of it before. Apparently it’s only a trying in 6 states. So weird and archaic.Apparently you should never be a lawyer....it's called "stealing of affection" and is usually given juries the license to grant huge sums to husband's.
Laws, by definition, are the morality of a society. It doesn't matter if you agree or not....laws are indeed the morality of a society.