Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

[The Rabbi]

Ergo we have proven that businesses create jobs, that that creation comes from investment, and that investment is driven by perceptions of prospects. These are all things the Left denies.

Dude the ONLY thing I have ever seen you PROVE, is how full of rabbit shit you are. LMAO.

Zeke, man. Lay off the Blatz for breakfast. I think you just pissed your pants.

 

[The Rabbi]

The only people you hired were brewers at the Blatz plant.

I own a brewery? Cool. I knew that demand was up for my product. That's why I hired more brewers. What about you? What business you own?

No, idiot. You created the demand. It's the only thing you've probably ever created.

 

[zeke]

No, idiot. You created the demand. It's the only thing you've probably ever created.

"The only people you hired were brewers at the Blatz plant:The only people you hired were brewers at the Blatz plant." rabbit..


The **** you say? You are the one that credited me with hiring more brewers. Brush up on your writing skills. They suck as bad as your ideas.

 

[The Rabbi]

No, idiot. You created the demand. It's the only thing you've probably ever created.

"The only people you hired were brewers at the Blatz plant:The only people you hired were brewers at the Blatz plant." rabbit..


The **** you say? You are the one that credited me with hiring more brewers. Brush up on your writing skills. They suck as bad as your ideas.

Hey Zeke. That first sixer already kicking in? Yeah, you increased demand with your beer bashes so Blatz had to hire extra people. Whats not clear about that?

 

[Mathbud1]

Demand creates nothing. Demand is not a person. Demand cannot act. Creation is an action. Actions require actors.

Demand may be a fine motivation, but it is no actor.

Sure it is. Why did WalMart open neighborhood stores......Demand.

Keep trying.

Demand cannot act because demand is not a PERSON. Demand makes no decisions. Demand DOES nothing. Demand is nothing but an intangible idea. Ideas can't do. People do. People make decisions. People act.

A job is not created until a person makes the decision to hire another person. Demand plays a role in that decision, but it is not alone in that. Cost plays a role as well, as does the availability of funds.

Until that decision is made, the job does not exist.

 

[RKMBrown]

Demand creates nothing. Demand is not a person. Demand cannot act. Creation is an action. Actions require actors.

Demand may be a fine motivation, but it is no actor.

Sure it is. Why did WalMart open neighborhood stores......Demand.

Keep trying.

Demand cannot act because demand is not a PERSON. Demand makes no decisions. Demand DOES nothing. Demand is nothing but an intangible idea. Ideas can't do. People do. People make decisions. People act.

A job is not created until a person makes the decision to hire another person. Demand plays a role in that decision, but it is not alone in that. Cost plays a role as well, as does the availability of funds.

Until that decision is made, the job does not exist.

I have lots of jobs to be done around the ranch here. I don't plan on hiring anyone till after Obama's been fired. I'll probably do some of the jobs myself. I won't be hiring or paying myself to do the jobs. I might even have one of my boys do some of these jobs. Either way the job "exists" as a task to be done. And it will be done. Your definition of job, might be what government thinks they are but it is not what I think it is. Further I might actually do some bartering for some of these jobs. Screw govco.

 

[Mathbud1]

Demand creates nothing. Demand is not a person. Demand cannot act. Creation is an action. Actions require actors.

Demand may be a fine motivation, but it is no actor.

Sure it is. Why did WalMart open neighborhood stores......Demand.

Keep trying.

Demand cannot act because demand is not a PERSON. Demand makes no decisions. Demand DOES nothing. Demand is nothing but an intangible idea. Ideas can't do. People do. People make decisions. People act.

A job is not created until a person makes the decision to hire another person. Demand plays a role in that decision, but it is not alone in that. Cost plays a role as well, as does the availability of funds.

Until that decision is made, the job does not exist.

I have lots of jobs to be done around the ranch here. I don't plan on hiring anyone till after Obama's been fired. I'll probably do some of the jobs myself. I won't be hiring or paying myself to do the jobs. I might even have one of my boys do some of these jobs. Either way the job "exists" as a task to be done. And it will be done. Your definition of job, might be what government thinks they are but it is not what I think it is. Further I might actually do some bartering for some of these jobs. Screw govco.

For the purposes of this discussion I would have to say that a job is only created if a person is hired or sought to fill a paying position. Economically speaking, that's what we're talking about.

If you have more work to accomplish and simply require those you already employ to do that additional work or just do the work yourself a job has not been created as far as the economy is concerned.

That's why demand can't be said to create jobs, because it doesn't. Higher demand may mean that a business has more work to accomplish to meet the demand, but until the company hires another worker a job has not been created. The company, based on costs, may decide that hiring another worker just isn't feasible. They may decide to increase the workload of the existing employees, invest in ways to increase efficiency, or simply opt out of meeting the higher demand at all. In all such cases demand rose but no new job was created. In the case of investing in increased efficiency some jobs may even be eliminated.

 

[The Rabbi]

Demand creates nothing. Demand is not a person. Demand cannot act. Creation is an action. Actions require actors.

Demand may be a fine motivation, but it is no actor.

Sure it is. Why did WalMart open neighborhood stores......Demand.

Keep trying.

Demand cannot act because demand is not a PERSON. Demand makes no decisions. Demand DOES nothing. Demand is nothing but an intangible idea. Ideas can't do. People do. People make decisions. People act.

A job is not created until a person makes the decision to hire another person. Demand plays a role in that decision, but it is not alone in that. Cost plays a role as well, as does the availability of funds.

Until that decision is made, the job does not exist.

I have lots of jobs to be done around the ranch here. I don't plan on hiring anyone till after Obama's been fired. I'll probably do some of the jobs myself. I won't be hiring or paying myself to do the jobs. I might even have one of my boys do some of these jobs. Either way the job "exists" as a task to be done. And it will be done. Your definition of job, might be what government thinks they are but it is not what I think it is. Further I might actually do some bartering for some of these jobs. Screw govco.

For the purposes of this discussion I would have to say that a job is only created if a person is hired or sought to fill a paying position. Economically speaking, that's what we're talking about.

If you have more work to accomplish and simply require those you already employ to do that additional work or just do the work yourself a job has not been created as far as the economy is concerned.

That's why demand can't be said to create jobs, because it doesn't. Higher demand may mean that a business has more work to accomplish to meet the demand, but until the company hires another worker a job has not been created. The company, based on costs, may decide that hiring another worker just isn't feasible. They may decide to increase the workload of the existing employees, invest in ways to increase efficiency, or simply opt out of meeting the higher demand at all. In all such cases demand rose but no new job was created. In the case of investing in increased efficiency some jobs may even be eliminated.

Sorry but thats way too sophisticated for the dopes on here like Billy and 1%.

 

[Mathbud1]

Demand creates nothing. Demand is not a person. Demand cannot act. Creation is an action. Actions require actors.

Demand may be a fine motivation, but it is no actor.

Sure it is. Why did WalMart open neighborhood stores......Demand.

Keep trying.

Demand cannot act because demand is not a PERSON. Demand makes no decisions. Demand DOES nothing. Demand is nothing but an intangible idea. Ideas can't do. People do. People make decisions. People act.

A job is not created until a person makes the decision to hire another person. Demand plays a role in that decision, but it is not alone in that. Cost plays a role as well, as does the availability of funds.

Until that decision is made, the job does not exist.

I have lots of jobs to be done around the ranch here. I don't plan on hiring anyone till after Obama's been fired. I'll probably do some of the jobs myself. I won't be hiring or paying myself to do the jobs. I might even have one of my boys do some of these jobs. Either way the job "exists" as a task to be done. And it will be done. Your definition of job, might be what government thinks they are but it is not what I think it is. Further I might actually do some bartering for some of these jobs. Screw govco.

For the purposes of this discussion I would have to say that a job is only created if a person is hired or sought to fill a paying position. Economically speaking, that's what we're talking about.

If you have more work to accomplish and simply require those you already employ to do that additional work or just do the work yourself a job has not been created as far as the economy is concerned.

That's why demand can't be said to create jobs, because it doesn't. Higher demand may mean that a business has more work to accomplish to meet the demand, but until the company hires another worker a job has not been created. The company, based on costs, may decide that hiring another worker just isn't feasible. They may decide to increase the workload of the existing employees, invest in ways to increase efficiency, or simply opt out of meeting the higher demand at all. In all such cases demand rose but no new job was created. In the case of investing in increased efficiency some jobs may even be eliminated.

Sorry but thats way too sophisticated for the dopes on here like Billy and 1%.

I tried keeping it simple. Simplicity went over their heads.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[Uncensored2008]

To hear the libs laments about evil capitalism, you'd think they all work for some homeless guy in an alley.

Sounds correct. Homeless guys tend to be unmedicated drunk crazies with low iq. Dangerous people that are to fucked up to know they need inpatient care. Tell that to them and they say they are fine and dont need a hospital. Ive seen and have experience trying to help these guys so i know.[/QUOTE]

So, typical democrats then?

 

[sealybobo]

"
Appearing at a Boston rally for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley on Friday, Hillary Clinton told the crowd gathered at the Park Plaza Hotel not to listen to anybody who says that “businesses create jobs.”

Hillary Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

....and you Lefty pusillanimous puss pockets will lap this right up.

Do you not understand what she is trying to say? Rather than me explain it to you, why don't you explain it to me. What does she mean when she says that? I get it. Don't you?

So I'm not going to spend hours on this thread trying to justify her position when you don't even have the brainpower to comprehend the rather simple concept.

Business' don't create jobs. Demand creates jobs. If you put money in the middle class and poor people's pockets, that is what creates jobs, you big dummy.

 

[Mathbud1]

"
Appearing at a Boston rally for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley on Friday, Hillary Clinton told the crowd gathered at the Park Plaza Hotel not to listen to anybody who says that “businesses create jobs.”

Hillary Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

....and you Lefty pusillanimous puss pockets will lap this right up.

Do you not understand what she is trying to say? Rather than me explain it to you, why don't you explain it to me. What does she mean when she says that? I get it. Don't you?

So I'm not going to spend hours on this thread trying to justify her position when you don't even have the brainpower to comprehend the rather simple concept.

Business' don't create jobs. Demand creates jobs. If you put money in the middle class and poor people's pockets, that is what creates jobs, you big dummy.

Except it has been comprehensively shown in this thread that that just isn't true.

Try reading it.

 

[Mathbud1]

Oops.

Double-posted.

 

[OnePercenter]

You and me have done more to create jobs than obama has done in 6 years. Im proud to be in top 1%. Im 28 abd could retire right now. Its that darn work ethic!

Were still feeling the effects of the Bush/corporate America/wall street failure of 2008. Caesars Entertainment filed BK yesterday stating not been able to recover from 2008.

 

[OnePercenter]

Yeah, right, the guy who said "they can have any color they want, so long as it's black."

Henry Ford didn't "test market" jack shit. He just kept making his cars cheaper and cheaper. Steve Jobs also didn't rely on test marketing. Test marketing is mostly for products like shampoo and hair care products - that is, products that rely mostly on image and advertising to sell rather than any intrinsic qualities of the product.

How did he know that black was the color?

Shampoo and hair care products are PRODUCT TESTED so the new hair product won't make your hair fall out.

Apple spends tens of millions on product testing. Two iPhone 6's.

 

[OnePercenter]

The first cars were produced in Germany ... And Henry Ford didn't have anything to market until he had a design to market. He didn't sell any cars until he collected the materials and had them produced.

So Henry Ford was the first to MASS MARKET the automobile. Thank You.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah, right, the guy who said "they can have any color they want, so long as it's black."

Henry Ford didn't "test market" jack shit. He just kept making his cars cheaper and cheaper. Steve Jobs also didn't rely on test marketing. Test marketing is mostly for products like shampoo and hair care products - that is, products that rely mostly on image and advertising to sell rather than any intrinsic qualities of the product.

How did he know that black was the color?

Shampoo and hair care products are PRODUCT TESTED so the new hair product won't make your hair fall out.

Apple spends tens of millions on product testing. Two iPhone 6's.

I'm not talking about testing for safety. I'm talking about market testing. Anyone who had a business would know the difference.

 

[OnePercenter]

You didnt just write that, did you? Poor thing.

I did. Consumer demand creates jobs.

 

[Mathbud1]

You didnt just write that, did you? Poor thing.

I did. Consumer demand creates jobs.

And you are as incorrect now as you were the first twenty times you said it.