Don Lemon Arrested

Not at all, I asserted a fact - the Church was open to the public.

Well, you are free to make whatever useless assertions that don't address the context of the law that you may desire, but I already covered the fact your opinion is certainly not a prerequisite, requirement or even worthwhile pursuit in regard to the law, or pretty much just about everything involved in the discussion.

However, I may tell you again if you fail to grasp it this time, at my leisure of course, as well as if and when I may desire.
Just thought I would add that part since you felt it necessary to clarify what your intentions were and what we are doing.
 
It is now journalism to question people about an event 1000s of miles away while they are in their place of worship?
That's a matter for the listener, reader, viewer - but there is no law against asking questions. There are no rules restricting journalists as to what they can and can't discuss (well there are in Russia and China, but not the US yet).
Wow, you are missing the plot. Again, is he allowed to quietly pray outside an abortion clinic?
I have no idea what you're talking about.
What about if he were present during J6 and was outside holding a bible? Is that cause for charges and prison time?
I doubt it, especially if he's a journalist. No journalists present on Jan 6 were prosecuted. But quite a few were attacked by the fanatical cult obsessed mob.
Do your research and then apply the same standards.
I always do.
 
I just saw an MSNOW video concerning the arrests of 4 "journalists" including celebrity Don Lemon. The video has at least 6 people talking, all of them bashing President Trump & his administration, with the usual "fascist" label talk.

What I found interesting about this video was that while they did show a few clips of the actual riot (when you're not invited, and don't leave when told to, it's a riot), these were without audio an just inserted as a visual background to the host & guests speaking.

How interesting that we viewers did not get any chance to see the event as it was, so as to decide for ourselves if Lemon et al, were there doing Journalism (as Lemon claims) or were they actually part of the agitation rioting, as well as instigating & inciting it.

It seems like their goal in this report is to 1) exonerate Lemon & the others from blame and 2) to thrust blame on the Trump administration for violating the 1st amendment by arresting Lemon.

What then becomes most interesting of all is that if MSNOW did want to exonerate Lemon and demonize Trump, and if Lemon was only there doing journalism, then wouldn't the best thing for them to do would be > have all these talking heads shut up, and just roll the video, and let us see for ourselves ?

The fact that they used 12 minutes of time presenting talkers, and zero minutes of time showing a full audio video of the event, rather indicates they're hiding something. Gee, what could that be ?
 
I just saw an MSNOW video concerning the arrests of 4 "journalists" including celebrity Don Lemon. The video has at least 6 people talking, all of them bashing President Trump & his administration, with the usual "fascist" label talk.

What I found interesting about this video was that while they did show a few clips of the actual riot (when you're not invited, and don't leave when told to, it's a riot), these were without audio an just inserted as a visual background to the host & guests speaking.

How interesting that we viewers did not get any chance to see the event as it was, so as to decide for ourselves if Lemon et al, were there doing Journalism (as Lemon claims) or were they actually part of the agitation rioting, as well as instigating & inciting it.

It seems like their goal in this report is to 1) exonerate Lemon & the others from blame and 2) to thrust blame on the Trump administration for violating the 1st amendment by arresting Lemon.

What then becomes most interesting of all is that if MSNOW did want to exonerate Lemon and demonize Trump, and if Lemon was only there doing journalism, then wouldn't the best thing for them to do would be > have all these talking heads shut up, and just roll the video, and let us see for ourselves ?

The fact that they used 12 minutes of time presenting talkers, and zero minutes of time showing a full audio video of the event, rather indicates they're hiding something. Gee, what could that be ?
 
I just saw an MSNOW video concerning the arrests of 4 "journalists" including celebrity Don Lemon. The video has at least 6 people talking, all of them bashing President Trump & his administration, with the usual "fascist" label talk.

What I found interesting about this video was that while they did show a few clips of the actual riot (when you're not invited, and don't leave when told to, it's a riot), these were without audio an just inserted as a visual background to the host & guests speaking.

How interesting that we viewers did not get any chance to see the event as it was, so as to decide for ourselves if Lemon et al, were there doing Journalism (as Lemon claims) or were they actually part of the agitation rioting, as well as instigating & inciting it.

It seems like their goal in this report is to 1) exonerate Lemon & the others from blame and 2) to thrust blame on the Trump administration for violating the 1st amendment by arresting Lemon.

What then becomes most interesting of all is that if MSNOW did want to exonerate Lemon and demonize Trump, and if Lemon was only there doing journalism, then wouldn't the best thing for them to do would be > have all these talking heads shut up, and just roll the video, and let us see for ourselves ?

The fact that they used 12 minutes of time presenting talkers, and zero minutes of time showing a full audio video of the event, rather indicates they're hiding something. Gee, what could that be ?
It's called "Communist propaganda".
 
I doubt it, especially if he's a journalist. No journalists present on Jan 6 were prosecuted. But quite a few were attacked by the fanatical cult obsessed mob.

And the Capitol is a place of public accommodation unlike a church

 
And the Capitol is a place of public accommodation unlike a church

I defer to the jury and everyone of the fanatical reprobates who went down for Jan 6 was convicted by a Jury.

Lets see if Lemon passes or fails the same test.

Have you watched the Melania movie yet? I heard someone did.
 
Maybe. But the feds can bankrupt the little weasel.
.

The most important aspect of this whole theater production. His white "husband" will probably divorce him as well, once he's nothing but a poor latte again.

.
 
It figures MAGA morons celebrate the arrest of a journalist. Since when do these idiots give a damn about the first amendment or the Constitution. So long as they can get their “penis hard,” that is all that matters. No wonder this nation is going down the authoritarian tubes.
.

"journalist"

:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:







.
 
15th post
So any journalist who may be covering a protest is now a protester. There goes the 1st amendment.
This is a win for Democrats.

The MAGA have this trend now of arresting people and doing the big media on the perp walk..This hasn't a prayer in court, I mean none with any Judge...
This type of hearing is one that should be televised... The Judge will throw this out and rebuke the DOJ lawyer...
 
This is a win for Democrats.

The MAGA have this trend now of arresting people and doing the big media on the perp walk..This hasn't a prayer in court, I mean none with any Judge...
This type of hearing is one that should be televised... The Judge will throw this out and rebuke the DOJ lawyer...
.

We accept that you believe that.








.
 
Don Lemon has been arrested and taken into custody for violating the Face Act, and possible terrorism charges.

An activist judge tried to prevent him from being charged last week, but now he's being arraigned on federal charges outside the corrupt judge's jurisdiction.

 
Don Lemon has been arrested and taken into custody for violating the Face Act, and possible terrorism charges.

An activist judge tried to prevent him from being charged last week, but now he's being arraigned on federal charges outside the corrupt judge's jurisdiction.

What makes you say it was an activist judge? Do you know anything about the case or are you just spewing hot air like a good like cult member?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom