Dominion Software version 5.5 used in ALL contested states.

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
54,961
Reaction score
80,745
Points
3,645
Location
The Southwestern Desert
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?

 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


When it returns favorable rsults for the Georgia run offs will you say it was still rigged?
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


When it returns favorable rsults for the Georgia run offs will you say it was still rigged?

Oh, they will be favorable alright....favorable to Donald Trumps win
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


When it returns favorable rsults for the Georgia run offs will you say it was still rigged?

Oh, they will be favorable alright....favorable to Donald Trumps win

Well, he's not running in the run-offs. He already lost his election.
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


When it returns favorable rsults for the Georgia run offs will you say it was still rigged?

Oh, they will be favorable alright....favorable to Donald Trumps win

Well, he's not running in the run-offs. He already lost his election.

You're confused.

Trump is VERY much in this election....and he's going to prevail.

Hate to bust your bubble.

YOU NIT EEE !!!!
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


When it returns favorable rsults for the Georgia run offs will you say it was still rigged?

Oh, they will be favorable alright....favorable to Donald Trumps win

Well, he's not running in the run-offs. He already lost his election.

You're confused.

Trump is VERY much in this election....and he's going to prevail.

Hate to bust your bubble.

YOU NIT EEE !!!!

The ballot reads otherwise....but clearly you've gone mad with anger and rage at the blob losing. Take care.
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?

The blue Pol Pots in 5th world Michigan and Pennsylvania wanted to ensure a T defeat
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?

". . . The study continued, “The seller side of the election technology industry has come to be characterized by a consolidated, highly concentrated market dominated by a few major vendors, where industry growth and competition are constrained.”

It says that Dominion acquired other companies to consolidate its position in the market.

Dominion is orange in this Penn Wharton map:"
dominion3.png

 
Why are we using software company's whose servers are not even located in the U.S. for U.S. elections in the first place?
This is totally counterintuitive. But very, very globalist.
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


From what I understand MIT is looking at these machines. Should be interesting.
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


Same reason they used Soros machines in the past (what could go wrong there),,, answer TO CHEAT
 
According to a Princeton professor who testified in front of Congress about Dominion, all it takes is 7 minutes and a screwdriver to alter the software in Dominion to throw votes. How long was the counting stopped for? :auiqs.jpg:
 
According to a Princeton professor who testified in front of Congress about Dominion, all it takes is 7 minutes and a screwdriver to alter the software in Dominion to throw votes. How long was the counting stopped for? :auiqs.jpg:
No wonder they put cardboard up in the windows!
 
People on the Left think they've pulled a fast one....that "Their Team won"

Suckers.

What they dramatically failed to realize is that they were played and those they elected couldn't care less about them after the election.
Zombiebots masterfully manipulated to help with their own demise.

The PROOF is in Venezuela where a chronicle of events very similar to what's going on in the US led to the Dictator they have today.
The Dictator does not care if leftists starve.
he couldn't care less if leftists babies cant get food.....HE IS LIVING LARGE.
His close circle enjoys absolute power and luxury, while Leftists in Venezuela hunt in garbage cans for something they can use or eat.

Such are fools who are gullible and think their racist and bigoted needs are sympathized with by cruel uncaring liars and deceivers called Democrats (for now)

PS...Unless Trump seizes power, I guess all your leftist screwed up accusations of him being a dictator were in your heads.
 
So we're supposed to trust a voting system designed and put in place by associates of Diane Feinstein.

EFF that.
I never did understand that. Dianne Feinstein and Electronic Frontier Foundation are of the same political party. For or against universal totalitarian government surveillance of all computer networks and communications. The EFF is a very limited hang-out for conservative or independent-minded knowledgeable computer users. Mostly it's a club, seeking information from advanced users in order to keep the One World Government surveillance infranstructure firmly inserted into our rectums while integrity and independence of our devices remain just out of reach of individual research.
 
So we're supposed to trust a voting system designed and put in place by associates of Diane Feinstein.

EFF that.
I never did understand that. Dianne Feinstein and Electronic Frontier Foundation are of the same political party. For or against universal totalitarian government surveillance of all computer networks and communications. The EFF is a very limited hang-out for conservative or independent-minded knowledgeable computer users. Mostly it's a club, seeking information from advanced users in order to keep the One World Government surveillance infranstructure firmly inserted into our rectums while integrity and independence of our devices remain just out of reach of individual research.

And, all of their servers are outside the U.S.!
 
So we're supposed to trust a voting system designed and put in place by associates of Diane Feinstein.

EFF that.
I never did understand that. Dianne Feinstein and Electronic Frontier Foundation are of the same political party. For or against universal totalitarian government surveillance of all computer networks and communications. The EFF is a very limited hang-out for conservative or independent-minded knowledgeable computer users. Mostly it's a club, seeking information from advanced users in order to keep the One World Government surveillance infranstructure firmly inserted into our rectums while integrity and independence of our devices remain just out of reach of individual research.

And, all of their servers are outside the U.S.!

As will be control of the USA soon.
 
The company’s equipment is used in North Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, Michigan, Arizona and Pennsylvania. Anyone doing research on Dominion Systems knows that it has tried to get a foothold in the lucrative market of Texas but 3 times, they were rejected because software experts were easily able to reveal the significant and dangerous flaws in the software. My question: "Was Texas the ONLY state that actually evaluated this software and tested it for robustness?"

That is standard operating procedure for any critical software based system. Did these states just approve Dominion without review or testing? If so, why?


When it returns favorable rsults for the Georgia run offs will you say it was still rigged?
Well, depends on who's doing the investigation...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom