Actually, it requires more than that.
No it doesn't. The law is quite precise.
War is violence for political ends.
Yes. It usually involves terror.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, it requires more than that.
War is violence for political ends.
War is violence for political ends.
just jazz?....how about the blues and rock n roll?.....No, but if I ever need a simple-minded bigot to translate my eloquence into a straw dog tiny enough even you can almost beat it up, I'll let you know.
Different peoples have dominated at different times, the current western dominance has not been a particularly lengthy one, your poor education leaves you ignorant of minority contributions to technology, and as far as the US goes, our only unique contribution to western culture has been jazz. That didn't come from a barbershop quartet. All you've done is provide evidence that Klan hoods are form fitting.
Oh, as for "third world," have you ever been to Mississippi? Even with all the help they get from the productive blue states, Rightardia remains America's Third World.
The law you don't cite is "quite precise"? You saidNo it doesn't. The law is quite precise.
Violence for political ends is terrorism by definition.
That's what the law says.
Yes, war "involves" terrorism. However, it is not legally defined as terrorism, as you declared, and I denied. MAGAts think creating their own reality is a super power.Yes. It usually involves terror.
Yeah, look how peacefully and Constitutionally the easily suckered losers attacked police.Actually NO. That was simply a peaceful protest gone bad where a group of people showed up to constitutionally air their grievances over the stolen election who finally got pissed off with capitol cops throwing exploding grenades into the crowd.
And, yet rather than even try to rebut any of it, this impotent squeak was the best you could do. Libertardians squeal with a mouth full of govt tit, while playing Hondo in cyberspace that the government mostly developed.BS
Leftwing talking points with a Red State Rant
Rambling, illiterate gibberish does not support the conspiracy theories you are trying to be a victim of.War usually involves territory and many other things. War can be sanctioned by a government over many things justified or not, but terrorism is not war because it is employed by individuals, not governments, and the sole aim of terrorism is to create anarchy within a society, often with no particular personal gain.
For instance, none of these people firebombing Teslas has gained anything in doing so. Not financially, not materially, it is purely a deliberate action done over a perceived slight.
Politicians in Washington and talking heads in the media have brainwashed and convinced idiots that Musk is an existential threat so great they are willing to ruin their personal lives, risk killing others, over it.
And those that truly gain in the melee didn't have to shell out one dime for these useful idiots to do their dirty work.
Any terrorist who wants to accept money from George Soros?The guy must have some sort of psychological issues. Who would engage in such random attacks?
why do you think Molotov cocktails are funny?I laughed when I heard our lovely attorney general refer to Molotov cocktails as WMDs.
The jokes write themselves.
These are democrat brownshirt terrorist.Vandal. not terrorist.
They're not funny. Calling them WMDs is.why do you think Molotov cocktails are funny?
They are weapons designed for mass destruction. They are weapons of terrorist.They're not funny. Calling them WMDs is.
And yet, they are far from hitting bottom.You are laughing at terrorism. It's a new low for the demaklan party
This is true....they will dig deeper and deeper and deeper.And yet, they are far from hitting bottom.
I would argue they could be used by a terrorist, but don't meet the definition of an WMD.They are weapons designed for mass destruction. They are weapons of terrorist.
You are laughing at terrorism. It's a new low for the demaklan party
A weapon of mass destruction is a nuclear, radiological, chemical, biological, or other device that is intended to harm a large number of people. The Department of Homeland Security works every day to prevent terrorists and other threat actors from using these weapons to harm Americans
why not? it's a chemical device met to harm a large number of people.I would argue they could be used by a terrorist, but don't meet the definition of an WMD.
![]()
Large number - hundreds to thousands.why not? it's a chemical device met to harm a large number of people.