Does this sound familiar to everyone here. The right wing economy.

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I saw this on facebook. It is so true. And from an ex Dem-

If you ever heard this statement “Democrats are for the poor and Republicans are for the rich” let me know in the comments. (I’ve tweaked it just a bit)
I’ve learned that if that statement is true it means that the Democrats need the poor and Republicans need the rich, so it would be in the best interests of Republicans to -help make all- Americans prosperous. And if Democrats are the party of the poor, then it's in the best interests of Democrats to keep Americans in poverty.

If you keep them dependent, then they keep voting Democrats in.

It's not true that Republicans are for the rich. They are for themselves....just like Democrats.

 

[depotoo]

I saw this on facebook. It is so true. And from an ex Dem-

If you ever heard this statement “Democrats are for the poor and Republicans are for the rich” let me know in the comments. (I’ve tweaked it just a bit)
I’ve learned that if that statement is true it means that the Democrats need the poor and Republicans need the rich, so it would be in the best interests of Republicans to -help make all- Americans prosperous. And if Democrats are the party of the poor, then it's in the best interests of Democrats to keep Americans in poverty.

If you keep them dependent, then they keep voting Democrats in.

It's not true that Republicans are for the rich. They are for themselves....just like Democrats.

The old Republicans wanted to see all Americans prosper. I think most do today, but unfortunately aren’t given a voice.

 

[miketx]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Yes, it sounds very much like this:

 

[jbander]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Well, they adore a brash, arrogant, narcissistic authoritarian of European descent who promises to save the country by ridding it of millions of undesirables.

Sound familiar? What would you expect?

More bullshit from the lunatic left. When has Trump ever suggested getting rid of millions of undesirables? You're just another bullshit artist making up a false narrative.

There are good people in white supremacist groups, Mexicans are rapist, he shits on Muslim Gold Star parents. He said a American judge was biased because he was a Mexican, been sued twice by the government for not renting to blacks. Hers trashed Native Americans. YOU MUST BE ******* JOKING

 

[jbander]

I saw this on facebook. It is so true. And from an ex Dem-

If you ever heard this statement “Democrats are for the poor and Republicans are for the rich” let me know in the comments. (I’ve tweaked it just a bit)
I’ve learned that if that statement is true it means that the Democrats need the poor and Republicans need the rich, so it would be in the best interests of Republicans to -help make all- Americans prosperous. And if Democrats are the party of the poor, then it's in the best interests of Democrats to keep Americans in poverty.

If you keep them dependent, then they keep voting Democrats in.

No they want the Democrats money also, so there is a conflict , but the right is only made up of hate groups now , just general pond scum.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Well, they adore a brash, arrogant, narcissistic authoritarian of European descent who promises to save the country by ridding it of millions of undesirables.

Sound familiar? What would you expect?

More bullshit from the lunatic left. When has Trump ever suggested getting rid of millions of undesirables? You're just another bullshit artist making up a false narrative.

There are good people in white supremacist groups, Mexicans are rapist, he shits on Muslim Gold Star parents. He said a American judge was biased because he was a Mexican, been sued twice by the government for not renting to blacks. Hers trashed Native Americans. YOU MUST BE ******* JOKING

So, is the reason Trump was cool back then when he made racial slurs about black people and refused to rent to them SOLELY because he was a Democrat then, a d a Republican now?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I saw this on facebook. It is so true. And from an ex Dem-

If you ever heard this statement “Democrats are for the poor and Republicans are for the rich” let me know in the comments. (I’ve tweaked it just a bit)
I’ve learned that if that statement is true it means that the Democrats need the poor and Republicans need the rich, so it would be in the best interests of Republicans to -help make all- Americans prosperous. And if Democrats are the party of the poor, then it's in the best interests of Democrats to keep Americans in poverty.

If you keep them dependent, then they keep voting Democrats in.

No they want the Democrats money also, so there is a conflict , but the right is only made up of hate groups now , just general pond scum.

The left is literally nothing but commies. Nothing but people so envious of others that they want theft by government and as history has shown (70 MILLION ******* TIMES) they will literally MURDER for the cause.

You are a ******* murderer and a thief.

See how that works?

 

[jbander]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

republicans arent right wing, they are just to the right of dems,,,,,and democrats being the far left wing makes them essentially communist which is FAR FAR worse than any republican,,,

just sayin,,,pot meet kettle,,,

Funny because the truth is democrats act too much like conservatives. A real liberal would not have signed NAFTA or signed that media deregulation bill in 1996 which allowed 7 large corporations to buy up 95% of our media. Are you kidding me?

And remember you guys said Obama was in GEs pocket.

Remember trump got a large piece of the unions votes. Democrats are the only party of the two that doesn’t hate unions.

Remember all of Hillary’s wallstreet donors.

Dont try to move the bar to the right. If the democrats were really liberal Elizabeth warren would be our nominee.

Stop it.

Bullcrap, read the act, 95% of it is totally great. The law in no way was set up to acomplish what happened but thats what happens to all laws concerning business , they day it's passed is the day that business starts looking for the loop holes , things that may be a advantage and ways to get around parts that get in the way. Are you that naive.

 

[Natural Citizen]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism. Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism.

We don't have free-market capitalism. We have a Keynesian system. Full blown socialism is the natural consequence of a Keynesian model, though. It's designed to fail. And it is. As it is, we have economic intervention. We have central economic planning by a central bank. We have a welfare state. We have inflationism. And we have a strong tendency toward deficit finance. There's nothing at all about that model that can in any way be compared to fee-market capitalism. And then to make a further comparison to socialism/communism is an apples and apples argument of the upmost proportions.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Fascism is leftwing, nor rightwing, dumbass. We've had this debate thousands of times on the internet, and the leftwingers always lose.

Nah man, PROGS are "liberal", know what I mean?

Men are chicks too, and a fetus is an eggplant.

 

[Dragonlady]

Fascism is leftwing, nor rightwing, dumbass. We've had this debate thousands of times on the internet, and the leftwingers always lose.

Yes, we've had this debate 1000 times and you lose EVERY SINGLE TIME.

From the Encyclopedia Britainnica. I've bolded the parts where they point out that facism opposed liberalism.

Although fascist parties and movements differed significantly from one another, they had many characteristics in common, including extreme militaristic nationalism, contempt for electoral democracy and political and cultural liberalism, a belief in natural social hierarchy and the rule of elites . . . .

In the United States the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist organization founded at the end of the Civil War and revived in 1915, displayed some fascist characteristics. . . . .

There has been considerable disagreement among historians and political scientists about the nature of fascism. Some scholars, for example, regard it as a socially radical movement with ideological ties to the Jacobins of the French Revolution, whereas others see it as an extreme form of conservatism inspired by a 19th-century backlash against the ideals of the Enlightenment. Some find fascism deeply irrational, whereas others are impressed with the rationality with which it served the material interests of its supporters. Similarly, some attempt to explain fascist demonologies as the expression of irrationally misdirected anger and frustration, whereas others emphasize the rational ways in which these demonologies were used to perpetuate professional or class advantages.

LAST, BUT CERTAINLY NOT LEAST, THERE ARE NO NAZI FLAGS AT DEMOCRATIC PROTESTS.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Zzzzzzzzzzz
God you useful idiots are indeed idiots

Is just a long chant that we've all heard a billion and one times already

 

[Dragonlady]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism. Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism.

We don't have free-market capitalism. We have a Keynesian system. Full blown socialism is the natural consequence of a Keynesian model, though. It's designed to fail. And it is. As it is, we have economic intervention. We have central economic planning by a central bank. We have a welfare state. We have inflationism. And we have a strong tendency toward deficit finance. There's nothing at all about that model that can in any way be compared to fee-market capitalism. And then to make a further comparison to socialism/communism is an apples and apples argument of the upmost proportions.

You don't have a Keynesian system, central planning or inflationism. Socialism is NOT the natural consequence of the Keynesian model. All of Western Europe, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have lived with a Keynesian model since the end of WWII, and it has been the most peaceful and prosperous time the world has every known, providing a taxpayer funded health care, education, and income supports for disabled people and retirees, a higher standard of living, strong employment rights, and opportunities to succeed.

You have some sort of bastardized hybrid system that is neither fish nor fowl. You're correct that it isn't working, but it is effectively funnelling all of the nations wealth to the top 10%. You do have a welfare state, but a very weak one - no government funded health care, and very limited help for the elderly or the disabled. Employees have few rights and there are few unions lefdt outside of the public sector.

 

[BluesLegend]

He's referring to enforcing our immigration laws.

I ***** slap the left on immigration when I point out the BILLIONS of even poorer people in other countries the left doesn't give a shit about. They shit a brick and run away.

 

[jbander]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism. Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism.

We don't have free-market capitalism. We have a Keynesian system. Full blown socialism is the natural consequence of a Keynesian model, though. It's designed to fail. And it is. As it is, we have economic intervention. We have central economic planning by a central bank. We have a welfare state. We have inflationism. And we have a strong tendency toward deficit finance. There's nothing at all about that model that can in any way be compared to fee-market capitalism. And then to make a further comparison to socialism/communism is an apples and apples argument of the upmost proportions.

You people are a hoot, we don't even have a demand side economy it is a supply side economy, that being said we then do not have a Keynesian econimy , so your starting this empty premise with bozo talk to start with. The rest is also bullshit , buddy no clue.

 

[jbander]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Zzzzzzzzzzz
God you useful idiots are indeed idiots

Is just a long chant that we've all heard a billion and one times already

contribute or you are gone, hardley give a dam what you think nor does anyone else , hense wasted bandwidth , which isn't allowed on my threads.

 

[jbander]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism. Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism.

We don't have free-market capitalism. We have a Keynesian system. Full blown socialism is the natural consequence of a Keynesian model, though. It's designed to fail. And it is. As it is, we have economic intervention. We have central economic planning by a central bank. We have a welfare state. We have inflationism. And we have a strong tendency toward deficit finance. There's nothing at all about that model that can in any way be compared to fee-market capitalism. And then to make a further comparison to socialism/communism is an apples and apples argument of the upmost proportions.

You don't have a Keynesian system, central planning or inflationism. Socialism is NOT the natural consequence of the Keynesian model. All of Western Europe, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have lived with a Keynesian model since the end of WWII, and it has been the most peaceful and prosperous time the world has every known, providing a taxpayer funded health care, education, and income supports for disabled people and retirees, a higher standard of living, strong employment rights, and opportunities to succeed.

You have some sort of bastardized hybrid system that is neither fish nor fowl. You're correct that it isn't working, but it is effectively funnelling all of the nations wealth to the top 10%. You do have a welfare state, but a very weak one - no government funded health care, and very limited help for the elderly or the disabled. Employees have few rights and there are few unions lefdt outside of the public sector.

we are dealing with idiots.

 

[bripat9643]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism. Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism.

We don't have free-market capitalism. We have a Keynesian system. Full blown socialism is the natural consequence of a Keynesian model, though. It's designed to fail. And it is. As it is, we have economic intervention. We have central economic planning by a central bank. We have a welfare state. We have inflationism. And we have a strong tendency toward deficit finance. There's nothing at all about that model that can in any way be compared to fee-market capitalism. And then to make a further comparison to socialism/communism is an apples and apples argument of the upmost proportions.

You people are a hoot, we don't even have a demand side economy it is a supply side economy, that being said we then do not have a Keynesian econimy , so your starting this empty premise with bozo talk to start with. The rest is also bullshit , buddy no clue.

The terms "supply side" and "demand side" are meaningless to economists. Politicians invented those terms.

 

[Flash]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

I'll give you the real definition.

The filthy ass government steals the money that is made by the productive people and gives it to the unproductive.

By the way, all governments are dictatorial. That is the very definition of government. Somebody else telling you how to live your life and how much of the money that you earned that you have to pony up

**** government. At best it is a necessary evil. At worse it becomes oppressive, thieving and murderous.

Any more questions?

 

[Wyatt earp]

The right has millions of definitions of what communism and socialism is , created by each right winger having their own personal definition, all ignoring the actual definition of communism and socialism . Suggesting that if it isn't capitalism then it is communism or socialism. Small problem they are leaving out their selected right wing economy. Most generally, “a governmental system dictatorial in nature, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.”
Unlike communism, fascism is opposed to state ownership of capital and economic equality is not a principle or goal. During the 1930s and WWII, communism and fascism represented the extreme left and right, respectively, in European politics. Hitler justified both Nazi anti-Semitism and dictatorship largely on the basis of his working to fight-off communism.
that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition. Couldn't be more clear could it.

Well, they adore a brash, arrogant, narcissistic authoritarian of European descent who promises to save the country by ridding it of millions of undesirables.

Sound familiar? What would you expect?

You equating Jewish citizens with criminals now?

Go **** yourself and stick the AM talk radio up your ass