Does society have a natural means of weeding out defectives?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Midnight FM

Gold Member
Joined
May 4, 2025
Messages
797
Reaction score
349
Points
143
I think one of the good things about defectives is that they tend to not naturally reproduce (except through non-consensual means), and get evolutionarily weeded out.

If we look at incels, pedophiles, and people who regularly post on 4chan, for example, they tend to naturally not reproduce, but their existence nevertheless makes day-to-day life less tolerable and more ugly for people of superior qualities (such as myself). So I wouldn't totally be against expediting their impending extinction.
 
If it did, this thread would have never been started...
You win the innertubes today!

ChampBelt2.webp
 
I think one of the good things about defectives is that they tend to not naturally reproduce (except through non-consensual means), and get evolutionarily weeded out.

If we look at incels, pedophiles, and people who regularly post on 4chan, for example, they tend to naturally not reproduce, but their existence nevertheless makes day-to-day life less tolerable and more ugly for people of superior qualities (such as myself). So I wouldn't totally be against expediting their impending extinction.
My, my, my, doesn't someone have a high opinion of him/herself.
There are plenty of "defectives" able to produce:
I consider the following as defectives: Dealers and manufacturers of illegal drugs, thieves, rapists, murderers, abusive parents, parents that refuse to discipline their children, no matter how bad they are, and on and on it goes.
 
I think one of the good things about defectives is that they tend to not naturally reproduce (except through non-consensual means), and get evolutionarily weeded out.

If we look at incels, pedophiles, and people who regularly post on 4chan, for example, they tend to naturally not reproduce, but their existence nevertheless makes day-to-day life less tolerable and more ugly for people of superior qualities (such as myself). So I wouldn't totally be against expediting their impending extinction.
Some things you forgot to mention are the younger Climate Change and other extremist liberal nuts who refuse to have children. That naturally weeds out defective genes also.
 
I think one of the good things about defectives is that they tend to not naturally reproduce (except through non-consensual means), and get evolutionarily weeded out.

If we look at incels, pedophiles, and people who regularly post on 4chan, for example, they tend to naturally not reproduce, but their existence nevertheless makes day-to-day life less tolerable and more ugly for people of superior qualities (such as myself). So I wouldn't totally be against expediting their impending extinction.

Why would you spend your time looking at incels, pedophiles, and people who regularly post on 4chan?

Yer creepin' me out, son.
 
This is not politics. This belongs in General Discussion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom