Well, if you can site a code that says it's against the law to discuss race feel free.
After all, we're taking Eric Holder's advice and trying not to be cowardly when not discussing the topic.
Oh, and FYI, being pro-black is in itself an indication of being anti-white. I'm not pro-white. I think favoring one race over another is racism. However, noticing racism does not mean you're a racist.
How much of the English language would one have to explain to make this clear?
Who said anything about the legality of discussing this? The idiocy of it may have been implied.
The statement was "IF" blacks were racist. 'If' is understood at least, I hope.
Logic is another little challenge it seems. By the measure you use, being for the Philadelphia Phillies means one is against Manchester United.
I guess sarcasm alludes you.
To get to the point of your post, which I was trying to dance around without nailing you on it, blacks are not collectively being screwed over.
This type of mentality is based in ancient urban legend. Nobody alive was a slave. Most of the people who were mistreated are in their 70s or 80s.
The biggest complainers weren't even born in the 50s when it was accepted to show discrimination in the deep South.
The problem today is Black leaders that constantly dredge up racial hatred simply to enrich themselves financially or to perpetuate their own special brand of racism. They call themselves Reverand to give themselves legitimacy and they mix religion with politics regardless of the left's claims that church and state must be separated.
Racism pays for some and it's politically desirable for Democrats. And what's really pathetic is the very political party that was so guilty of showing discrimination all the way up to the Civil Rights movement in the 60s and 70s are trying to patronize blacks for their votes and trying to attack Republicans for being racist.
