Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 98,396
- 3,635
So you believe stiffing their vendors, leaseholders, and their severance payment obligations is a good idea for the health of the company?
Seems they think he's a god who can do no wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you believe stiffing their vendors, leaseholders, and their severance payment obligations is a good idea for the health of the company?
Cool! Do traitor scum like you buy them too?![]()
Elon Musk is about to learn that liberals—not his new deplorable pals—buy Teslas
I drive a Tesla. I live in the San Francisco Bay Area. Sometimes it feels like a third of people around me drive Teslas. I see lots of Teslas in New York City, Austin, and Seattle. I don’t see many of them in Alabama, or the Florida Panhandle or...www.dailykos.com
As Elon dives into the RW world of lies and conspiracy theories...he might want to think about the damage he is doing to Tesla. Alabama and Kentucky are not big Tesla markets.
GM and Ford are barreling ahead with EVs. And there are lots of start up EV companies out there that would love to see Tesla weakened..
Wow, your extreme desperation is palpable. Comprehension is not your strength, is it?
NO ONE said 71% of Democrats would have changed their vote, NO ONE.
As you know, the polls did show:
- Mar 17, 2022
FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech
![]()
FLASHBACK: 16% of Biden voters would have voted differently if Hunter Biden laptop story was not suppressed by media, big tech
A poll previously put out by the Media Research Center showed that fully 16 percent of voters who were unaware of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal would have switched their minds and not voted for Joe Biden for president, had they known about it at the time.thepostmillennial.com
Since we know that comprehension is not your strong suit, allow me to point out that this headline says BIDEN VOTERS. It does not say, Democrats. That would mean ALL voters, Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.
The headline also does not say WHO they would have switched their vote to, Republican, Independent, themselves.
It would have changed the winner. That angers the bejabbers out of you. Oh well.
Which, and I'm sure you'll agree, demonstrates the tremendous character of Elon Musk. Few folks are willing to put their money where their mouth is today. Elon Musk, along with every other honest American, sees the heavy hand of the far left on the scale and set out to do something.
I understand your fear and apprehension. Transparency and honesty are the last things Democrats want.
Nearly every company is in financial difficulty in Joe Biden's disastrous economy. Except maybe Big Pharma corporations selling vaccines...
![]()
Try again. I'll type slowly for you this time.
Specifically, what does that have to do with transparency and full disclosure coming out from Twitter? Why are you so afraid of the facts about shadow banning, censorship, and election interference?
I should think that you would want truth and full disclosure. Especially about our elections. Or, are you afraid of those facts being disclosed? If so, why?
Is that right?! Where are you getting that information from?
What about it? It was at what 30 or 31K when Biden started and its at 33-34K now... That doesn't look like a disaster to me.The stock market.
Thats another dodge. If you had an actual example then you would have posted it by now and made the stronger point. But you didn't even try which tells me you are full of shit.Your reading and comprehension would not get through the second grade.
Is that right?! Where are you getting that information from?
Why? Try to be specific.I don't really care about users, it's the stampede of advertisers heading for the exits that tickles me pink.
Informing yourself would be a great step forward for you to not appear so ignorant. But then, it's your choice, isn't it?I was certain Musk was a galactic level prick when he accused the cave divers who rescued the Thai kid soccer team of being pedophiles because they couldn't use his homemade submarine. He's also a scheister who exists to get government subsidies/contracts.
It’s ok, I wasn’t expecting a direct answer from you
NO ONE said 71% of Democrats would have changed their vote, NO ONE.
LOL
No one said that??
YOU posted a link to this where they said exactly that...
You're out of your fucking mind, con; denying what YOU post because it's ludicrous.
Again, tell me how 32% of Republicans would have changed their vote for Trump to someone else when only 6% of Republicans didn't vote for Trump in 2020.
![]()
Questioning that businesses in America are suffering is so simple I don't see how anyone can even try to refute that claim.It’s ok, I wasn’t expecting a direct answer from you
That's twelve levels of horse puckey. But if it makes you feel better to defend a hyper billionaire, you be you baby!Informing yourself would be a great step forward for you to not appear so ignorant. But then, it's your choice, isn't it?
"Musk’s lawyers argued that the epithet “pedo guy” is commonly used in Musk’s home country of South Africa to mean “creepy old man.” The term is “aimed at mocking a person’s appearance and demeanor, not an accusation of pedophilia,” and the insult could be interpreted as an opinion, Musk’s attorneys argue. (Under the First Amendment, opinions are often protected speech and typically not considered defamatory.)"
[...]
"The controversy began when Unsworth described Musk’s miniature submarine as a PR stunt. A few days after the boys were rescued, he told CNN in an interview that Musk’s escape pod “had absolutely no chance of working” and said Musk can “can stick his submarine where it hurts.”
Musk responded in a series of tweets that referred to Unsworth as a “pedo guy.” The posts were later deleted, and Musk issued an apology."