Does Biden / Do Democrats & Snowflakes Believe The US Can Save the Planet By Itself

According to Al Gore the coastal cities of the world should have already suffered the fate of fabled Atlantis.

Other leftist quacks have said we should all be dead already after that and before now

'No Handcuffs' AOC has declared years ago we only had a few years to go before we're all dead.

(The fear-mongering never ends)

I personly believe we only have a short time to prevent our destrucrion ... at the hands of the f*ed up Democrats and their failed, self-destructive policies.

THAT, IMO, is the real National Emergency.

Sounds more like the sane normal people need saving from the climate kooks and global warming fruitcakes.
 
Gore rule invoked. Whatever cultist invokes Gore first forfeits the thread for their side, being that it's the ultimate cult-loser move.

Bwuhahahahaha

Wow, being reminded of the libtard loser REALLY triggers you...

That's funny as hell!

1658367744918.png
 
Leading by example.

Apparently, it's just a liberal thing. The concept seems to be completely alien to conservatives.
LOL, the left NEVER does that including the people spouting off about it....they have HUGE carbon footprints, giant houses and use TONS of electricity. When they move into a normal ranch house, let me know.
 
Here is what I don't get. Biden's strategy is sheer genius. I mean which country do you want to be, the one that runs out of fossil fuels first, or the one that runs out last? Because let's be clear, the transition away from fossil fuels will not be easy, nor will it come without pain. So where do we want to be 50 years from now, the country that has totally depleted their fossil fuel resources and is forced to make that transition, or the country that still sits on record amount of reserves and can slow roll that transition.
~~~~~~
Then why has Joey Xi Bai Dung drained out SPR and sold part of it to China?
 
LOL, the left NEVER does that including the people spouting off about it....they have HUGE carbon footprints, giant houses and use TONS of electricity. When they move into a normal ranch house, let me know.

~~~~~~~
Indeed, Gore and Kerry create more carbon than anyone in America.
**********​
 
Folks, everybody calm down. I have the final word of the Foremost Climate Expert and Um, horse face.

We only have 9 years left, so live it up.


 
Last edited:
~~~~~~
Then why has Joey Xi Bai Dung drained out SPR and sold part of it to China?
You mean like Trump did as well?


By your logic, that makes Trump a Chinese agent. And you suck the ass of that Chinese agent, so by proxy, you're also Chinese ass-sucker.
 

Biden declares a National Emergency & declares he will mobilize the US to save the planet...

John Kerry, the US point man on Global Warming, flies around on his private jet that belches record amounts of carbon...

Democrats have convinced shutting down US energy production and instead encouraging enemy nations to drill & produce more, put it on fossil-fuel powered carbon-belching tankers, shipping it halfway around the world, loading it onto diesel-gulping carbon-belching tanker trucks, & hauling it to refineries is somehow saving the planet.

While the rest of the planet refuses to commit national economic suicide Biden is forcing a painful transition from fossil fuel to a non-existent alternative while relying on solar, wind, and water - that provides on 12% of the energy we need as a country.

China is not abiding by a Green Energy agenda that is hamstringing their manufacturing and industrial existence/future.

Why is the US not considering Nuclear energy? '3 Mile Island' part 2? There have been so many technological advances they would make accidents like that almost impossible today.

Biden / Buttigieg tell Americans to buy an electric car if they can't afford gas.
- Electric cars cost approx $65k, - Have to be charged for about 9hrs
- There are already chargibg stations charging $0.35 a MINUTE (& you know thsy"s coming everywhere because no one wil allow you to chargge your car for 9hrs for free for long). 9 hrs at $.35 a minute is over $200 for a 'fill-up'
- The cost of replacement batteries are insane at several thousand dollars
- The cost of EV infrastructure (charging stations et al) is going to be INSANE (& cause charging your car to go up)
** But Biden and Buttigieg try to sell you on tge idea buying an EV will he cheaper


All things vonsideted, the leftist scam artists funded by Putin to get countries like the US to embrace insane policies like the Green New Deal, leading to national economic suicide, has leftist / Democrats racing towards the cliff like Lemmings to go plunging headlong to rhis nation's 'death'...

...with a dementia-ravaged, old man who needs cue cards telling him when to walk, talk, & sit leading the way through insane EOs.



Um...journalist boi?

193 countries have signed the Paris climate accord.

You know, the one Trump unilaterally pulled the US out of without congressional approval?

All caught up now?

You really need to do some homework.
 
Oh yeah China is waiting to see what we are going to do on climate change while they contribute the majority of the worlds air and water pollution BY THEMSELVES. :auiqs.jpg:

The submission means China has now officially confirmed that its commitment to tackle climate change under the terms of the Paris Agreement will see it peak its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions before 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions before 2060.

Try to keep up.
 

Biden declares a National Emergency & declares he will mobilize the US to save the planet...

John Kerry, the US point man on Global Warming, flies around on his private jet that belches record amounts of carbon...

Democrats have convinced shutting down US energy production and instead encouraging enemy nations to drill & produce more, put it on fossil-fuel powered carbon-belching tankers, shipping it halfway around the world, loading it onto diesel-gulping carbon-belching tanker trucks, & hauling it to refineries is somehow saving the planet.

While the rest of the planet refuses to commit national economic suicide Biden is forcing a painful transition from fossil fuel to a non-existent alternative while relying on solar, wind, and water - that provides on 12% of the energy we need as a country.

China is not abiding by a Green Energy agenda that is hamstringing their manufacturing and industrial existence/future.

Why is the US not considering Nuclear energy? '3 Mile Island' part 2? There have been so many technological advances they would make accidents like that almost impossible today.

Biden / Buttigieg tell Americans to buy an electric car if they can't afford gas.
- Electric cars cost approx $65k, - Have to be charged for about 9hrs
- There are already chargibg stations charging $0.35 a MINUTE (& you know thsy"s coming everywhere because no one wil allow you to chargge your car for 9hrs for free for long). 9 hrs at $.35 a minute is over $200 for a 'fill-up'
- The cost of replacement batteries are insane at several thousand dollars
- The cost of EV infrastructure (charging stations et al) is going to be INSANE (& cause charging your car to go up)
** But Biden and Buttigieg try to sell you on tge idea buying an EV will he cheaper


All things vonsideted, the leftist scam artists funded by Putin to get countries like the US to embrace insane policies like the Green New Deal, leading to national economic suicide, has leftist / Democrats racing towards the cliff like Lemmings to go plunging headlong to rhis nation's 'death'...

...with a dementia-ravaged, old man who needs cue cards telling him when to walk, talk, & sit leading the way through insane EOs.




Given that the carbon emission from the USA are the highest per capita on the planet, and there are 337 million of you producing that carbon, the answer to your question is a resounding YES.

It should also be noted that without American work to lower emissions, there is little that the rest of world can do without you.
 

The submission means China has now officially confirmed that its commitment to tackle climate change under the terms of the Paris Agreement will see it peak its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions before 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions before 2060.

Try to keep up.
China never saw an agreement they couldn't crap on. They don't play by rules, they have a slave labor camp of over a million prisoners and children. They have lied, cheated and stolen their way to our number one adversary. They are firing up coal plants all over China. They use the oceans as a giant garbage dump. Paris Climate Accord??? BHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!! :auiqs.jpg:
 
:auiqs.jpg:

Global warming?

iu


When we get record lows in the winter and ask, "where the hell is our global warming?" YOU are the ones that berate us, and tell us, there is a difference between "climate change," and a little bit of bad weather?

And now? You are running hysterical. . . over a few hot days in summer, telling us we need to declare a state of emergency over some hot days in the summer?

What the hell happened to you folks understanding the difference between "climate," and "weather?"


:dunno:

. . . and need I remind you? Trump NEVER, EVER, tapped the treasury for his wall. He only used the congress, and was restricted to whatever they gave him, just as Biden should be.

:rolleyes:
Well first off, yeah, Trump kind of tapped the treasury, and no, he didn't spend money Congress allocated, well at least not allocated for the wall. He declared a "national emergency" and then used "emergency presidential powers" to divert spending that was "allocated" to the defense department, and spent it on his wall.

But now here is the thing. The very same thing that is causing those low temperatures in the winter, is causing the heat wave in Europe. Changes in the jet stream, caused by global warming, has shifted the polar vortex south in the winter and north in the summer. And while a heat wave is one thing, droughts, flooding, higher intensity thunderstorms, more frequent, and violent, hurricanes. The writing is on the wall and the window of opportunity is quickly closing.
 
Well first off, yeah, Trump kind of tapped the treasury, and no, he didn't spend money Congress allocated, well at least not allocated for the wall. He declared a "national emergency" and then used "emergency presidential powers" to divert spending that was "allocated" to the defense department, and spent it on his wall.

But now here is the thing. The very same thing that is causing those low temperatures in the winter, is causing the heat wave in Europe. Changes in the jet stream, caused by global warming, has shifted the polar vortex south in the winter and north in the summer. And while a heat wave is one thing, droughts, flooding, higher intensity thunderstorms, more frequent, and violent, hurricanes. The writing is on the wall and the window of opportunity is quickly closing.

What are you doing to help?
 
Do tell. How bad is it going to get, and how soon?
If you are a boomer you will probably be alright until you die. After that it does not matter how bad it gets does it? The twentieth century's most generous beneficiaries have decided the future can suck a dick before they do anything different. So eat drink and be merry. You get to be one of the last humans that will be able to pretend everything is fine.

this-is-fine.0.jpg
 
Well first off, yeah, Trump kind of tapped the treasury, and no, he didn't spend money Congress allocated, well at least not allocated for the wall. He declared a "national emergency" and then used "emergency presidential powers" to divert spending that was "allocated" to the defense department, and spent it on his wall.

But now here is the thing. The very same thing that is causing those low temperatures in the winter, is causing the heat wave in Europe. Changes in the jet stream, caused by global warming, has shifted the polar vortex south in the winter and north in the summer. And while a heat wave is one thing, droughts, flooding, higher intensity thunderstorms, more frequent, and violent, hurricanes. The writing is on the wall and the window of opportunity is quickly closing.

iu



Real science? You can create experiments to show your hypothesis are falsifiable. Everything that you are telling us? It is pseudo-scientific woo. . . garbage. No matter what the issue, it is all the fault of "humans."

:rolleyes:

Climate change makes for shorter winters

Climate change makes for harsher winters

Climate change means less snow
669536


Climate change means more snow

Climate change causes droughts in California

Climate change causes floods in Texas and Oklahoma

Climate change makes wet places wetter and dry places drier...

...except when it makes wet places dryer...

Unusual Drought in Thailand Makes High Vulnerability to Climate Change Evident​


...and dry places wetter

Climate change causes more hurricanes

Hurricanes Have Doubled Due to Global Warming, Study Says​


Climate change causes less hurricanes

Climate change causes more rain (but less water)

Climate change causes less rain

Climate change decreases the spread of malaria

Climate change increases the spread of malaria

Climate change makes San Francisco foggier

Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy

Climate change causes duller autumn leaves

Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves

Climate change makes for less salty seas

Climate change makes for saltier seas

Climate change causes Antarctica to lose land ice

Climate change causes Antarctica to gain land ice

Climate change makes the earth hotter...

...unless the earth isn't getting hotter...

...in which case climate change can explain that, too.

Science as Falsification​

The following excerpt was originally published in Conjectures and Refutations (1963).

by Karl R. Popper​


" . . . . These considerations led me in the winter of 1919-20 to conclusions which I may now reformulate as follows.
  1. It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory — if we look for confirmations.
  2. Confirmations should count only if they are the result of risky predictions; that is to say, if, unenlightened by the theory in question, we should have expected an event which was incompatible with the theory — an event which would have refuted the theory.
  3. Every "good" scientific theory is a prohibition: it forbids certain things to happen. The more a theory forbids, the better it is.
  4. A theory which is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory (as people often think) but a vice.
  5. Every genuine test of a theory is an attempt to falsify it, or to refute it. Testability is falsifiability; but there are degrees of testability: some theories are more testable, more exposed to refutation, than others; they take, as it were, greater risks.
  6. Confirming evidence should not count except when it is the result of a genuine test of the theory; and this means that it can be presented as a serious but unsuccessful attempt to falsify the theory. (I now speak in such cases of "corroborating evidence.")
  7. Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers — for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status. (I later described such a rescuing operation as a "conventionalist twist" or a "conventionalist stratagem.")

One can sum up all this by saying that the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability. . . . "

"Karl Popper famously said, "A theory that explains everything explains nothing." So what do you make of the theory that catastrophic manmade CO2-driven "climate change" can account for harsher winters and lighter winters, more snow and less snow, droughts and floods, more hurricanes and less hurricanes, more rain and less rain, more malaria and less malaria, saltier seas and less salty seas, Antarctica ice melting and Antarctic ice gaining and dozens of other contradictions? Popper gave a name to "theories" like this: pseudoscience."

Climate Change is Unfalsifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience​



 
Um...journalist boi?

193 countries have signed the Paris climate accord.

You know, the one Trump unilaterally pulled the US out of without congressional approval?

All caught up now?

You really need to do some homework.
We were the ones who were paying the freight. And India and China who make many of the products for us are the ones who need to clean up. Teh technology currently exists to clean their emissions to our standards.
 

Forum List

Back
Top