Clinton lied under oath. Bush didnt lie at all.
Clinton abused his position to have sex with a subordinate.
Bush didnt abuse his position at all.
Your moral compass is "Dem-good. GOP-bad". Bush has nothing to do with any of this. But you have to drag him in because you are losing the argument really badly.
How do you defend bosses who prey on subordinates for sex? I think that says a lot about your lack of ethics.
Oh, sorry my bad. Lying under oath is soooo much different from lying generally.
Bush didn't abuse his power? You're right. He was totally incompetent. It was his puppet masters who did the abusing on his behalf. Mind you, 'not knowing' is not an excuse. He is just as guilty.
Clinton did not abuse his position. You mean Monica "the opportunist" Lewinsky is innocent in all this? Is that what you're trying to peddle here?
I'm a centrist. What I'm not is a shill for the neocon whackjob right like you have been and always will be.
Oh, so Clinton preyed on Lewinsky. I'm sure she felt real bad about it. You get that impression from her after all the interviews and how she ingratiated herself upon him. Clinton was a sleeze no doubt. But I'd rather have a sleeze in office who is smart, knew what he was doing and actually got things done than a pretzel-munching, neocon puppet whose only raison d'etre is to line his cronies pockets and send people off to war to die when none of them were willing to do it themselves.
What did Bush give you other than two unnecessary wars and a massive depression?