Does America want to be a leader or an outsider?

[rupol2000]

The traditional right pursued a policy of internal integration of the American continent and European non-intervention in the American world (like the Monroe Doctrine).

Reformers and democrats are pulling into Eurocentrism. But in Eurocentrism, the center is Europe.

When America was American-centric, it was a leader, at least in America continent. If it follow the path of Eurocentrism, America will never again be a leader in either a bipolar or unipolar world.

If America wants leadership, it must reject Eurocentrism, there is no third way.

 

[JGalt]

We no longer have the leadership it takes to be a world leader. America is now relegated to sitting on the sidelines and writing "strongly-worded" letters to foreign leaders, or throwing trillions of dollars at problems our lack of leadership caused, while our own people suffer under the weight of the our own administration's political and economic stupidity.

 

[rupol2000]

We no longer have the leadership it takes to be a world leader. America is now relegated to sitting on the sidelines and writing "strongly-worded" letters to foreign leaders, or throwing trillions of dollars at problems our lack of leadership caused, while our own people suffer under the weight of the our own administration's political and economic stupidity.

But don't you want America to be the leader again?

 

[JGalt]

But don't you want America to be the leader again?

Too late now. We tried that in 2016 but the forces of tyranny and oppression were greater than Trump.

At this point, there's nothing left but for someone to push the reset button, burn it all to the ground, and start it over again, like the founding fathers intended.

 

[Donald H]

The traditional right pursued a policy of internal integration of the American continent and European non-intervention in the American world (like the Monroe Doctrine).

Reformers and democrats are pulling into Eurocentrism. But in Eurocentrism, the center is Europe.

When America was American-centric, it was a leader, at least in America continent. If it follow the path of Eurocentrism, America will never again be a leader in either a bipolar or unipolar world.

If America wants leadership, it must reject Eurocentrism, there is no third way.

Europe won't hurry to ally with America, but they won't openly ally with China and Russia. Their choice of the two great alliances will be behind the scenes and based on their own best interests.

America isn't offering anything but war, that's only in America's interests.

 

[rupol2000]

Too late now. We tried that in 2016 but the forces of tyranny and oppression were greater than Trump.

At this point, there's nothing left but for someone to push the reset button, burn it all to the ground, and start it over again, like the founding fathers intended.

trump is an agent of europe

 

[rupol2000]

Europe won't hurry to ally with America, but they won't openly ally with China and Russia. Their choice of the two great alliances will be behind the scenes and based on their own best interests.

America isn't offering anything but war, that's only in America's interests.

There will be no union. They will make America a second-rate colony. It happened before.

 

[Donald H]

There will be no union. They will make America a second-rate colony. It happened before.

Did it happen before?
Did Europe play a part in America's loss of the Vietnam war?

 

[JGalt]

trump is an agent of europe

Whaaaa?

Trump is an agent of the Trump Organization right now. He was formerly the President of the United States, so he was the executive agent of the United States.

Europe itself is eaten up with globalism, and Trump is no globalist. In fact, he was the most anti-globalism President this country has ever had. His campaign slogan was not "Make Europe Great Again", it was "Make America Great Again", and everything he did was for the benefit of this country, not Europe.

 

[Donald H]

Whaaaa?

Trump is an agent of the Trump Organization right now. He was formerly the President of the United States, so he was the executive agent of the United States.

Europe itself is eaten up with globalism, and Trump is no globalist. In fact, he was the most anti-globalism President this country has ever had. His campaign slogan was not "Make Europe Great Again", it was "Make America Great Again", and everything he did was for the benefit of this country, not Europe.

Trump is compromised by Russia and his personal priorities made it very easy for Russia. Early on Trump had no interest in national security and that made him the perfect patsy to serve Russia's interests.

Neither America or Russia have ever had any doubts that the other was the enemy. This would have made it an absolute certainty that Russia would get their grip on Trump's neck.

Accept that it's the 'pissing hookers' story, or find something else. It's obviously a done deal for Russia.

In the real world, Russia wins the war if Trump is elected as president.

 

[Donald H]

Whaaaa?

Trump is an agent of the Trump Organization right now. He was formerly the President of the United States, so he was the executive agent of the United States.

Europe itself is eaten up with globalism, and Trump is no globalist. In fact, he was the most anti-globalism President this country has ever had. His campaign slogan was not "Make Europe Great Again", it was "Make America Great Again", and everything he did was for the benefit of this country, not Europe.

As was Nazi Germany in fact anti-globalist and was pro nationalist as the opposite priority.

 

[rupol2000]

Whaaaa?

Everyone knows that the Reform Party (probably the American branch of the Latvian Reform Party) has nothing to do with the right.

 

[rupol2000]

He was

That doesn't prevent Reform Party senators from voting faggots in Congress.

 

[rupol2000]

Neither America or Russia have ever had any doubts that the other was the enemy. This would have made it an absolute certainty that Russia would get their grip on Trump's neck.

This is not true. Under the right, they were always friends, the difference is that at that time America put its people and not vice versa.

 

[rupol2000]

 

[Donald H]

This is not true. Under the right, they were always friends, the difference is that at that time America put its people and not vice versa.

The part of your message that makes sense is reply worthy. Trump would have actually believed that Russia/Putin was his friend. That how simple minded he was/is.. That played on John Bolton and other hawks so heavily that he had to turn against Trump and then even become vocal against him.

And who knows what you mean with America putting it's people??

So consider that Russia wouldn't have missed the opportunity to compromise Trump. The best explanation has to be 'the pissing hookers' but it doesn't have to be.

But if not that then what other opportunity did Russia capitalize on?

Does this cause you to suspect that America's very security depends on not ever allowing Trump to regain power?

How will 'they' stop Trump? I have some suspicions on that!

It really depends on what works the best for the FBI/DOJ. You see now why neither side can claim that the FBI can remain within the limits of the law.

 

[rupol2000]

The part of your message that makes sense is reply worthy. Trump would have actually believed that Russia/Putin was his friend. That how simple minded he was/is.. That played on John Bolton and other hawks so heavily that he had to turn against Trump and then even become vocal against him.

And who knows what you mean with America putting it's people??

So consider that Russia wouldn't have missed the opportunity to compromise Trump. The best explanation has to be 'the pissing hookers' but it doesn't have to be.

But if not that then what other opportunity did Russia capitalize on?

Does this cause you to suspect that America's very security depends on not ever allowing Trump to regain power?

How will 'they' stop Trump? I have some suspicions on that!

It really depends on what works the best for the FBI/DOJ. You see now why neither side can claim that the FBI can remain within the limits of the law.

I don't care about Trump, I was talking about the real right. They ruled the USSR through loyal general secretaries and their advisers.

Trump is the opposite, he is the henchman of Europe in the United States.

 

[ESay]

Everyone knows that the Reform Party (probably the American branch of the Latvian Reform Party) has nothing to do with the right.

American branch of the Latvian Reform Party? Is that supposed to be a joke of the day?

 

[rupol2000]

American branch of the Latvian Reform Party? Is that supposed to be a joke of the day?

in any case, I found only two reform parties - the Trumpist and the Latvian.

 

[rupol2000]

American branch of the Latvian Reform Party? Is that supposed to be a joke of the day?

I'm sorry, this is an Estonian party. I messed up. But the difference is small.

Estonian Reform Party - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org