Do You Trust WorldNetDaily to Tell You the Truth?

[California Girl]

So now that the irrelevance of the Amicus briefs has been established, you are moving the goal posts.

In the appeal Fox argued that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. And as you can see from the decision of the court below, that was the winning point!

So, they did not win the 'right to lie' then, did they. And the reason why a whole bunch of other news outlet supported Fox..... because they all have similar policies. It was not about 'lying'. So, in fact... anyone who claims that 'Fox won the right to lie' is, in fact, lying.

So you are arguing that a deliberate distortion of the truth IS the truth.

So again we see CON$ on both sides of the "it all depends on what the meaning of is, is" argument.
A deliberate distortion is not a lie. BRILLIANT!

No, I mean that stating 'Fox won the right to lie' is, in fact, a lie. They did not 'win the right to lie'. And.... nor did the organizations who piggybacked the lawsuit. Ok? It just is not true. Period.