Do you trust Trump to NOT weaken the rights of private property owners if elected?

[BluesLegend]

Trump isn't going to be president so no worries.

How is that you know?

DC is that corrupt trust me the establishment parties of corruption won't let it happen.

 

[S.J.]

Trump didn't write the law, pass the law, or sign the law. How is he getting blamed for it? And if anyone thinks the Democrats are any more likely to change it, think again.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Yes, I trust him because his business depends on the strength of private property rights.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump didn't write the law, pass the law, or sign the law. How is he getting blamed for it? And if anyone thinks the Democrats are any more likely to change it, think again.

Of course not- Trump has never had anything to do with governing or the law.

But Trump eagerly used the law to try to move a private residence out of her home to advance his private business interests.

If you agree with that- well Trump is your man.

 

[Syriusly]

Yes, I trust him because his business depends on the strength of private property rights.

Absolutely- everyone should trust Trump.

I am sure each of the persons who lost money when one of his business's declared bankruptcy feels the same way- just Trump will do the right thing.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Yes, I trust him because his business depends on the strength of private property rights.

Absolutely- everyone should trust Trump.

I am sure each of the persons who lost money when one of his business's declared bankruptcy feels the same way- just Trump will do the right thing.

They were business people who understood their risks, unlike libtards.

And in fact, they probably made as much money on taking the loss as write-offs as they would ahve had the businesses stayed solvent. You would understand this if you werent so fucking stupid as shit.

 

[S.J.]

Yes, I trust him because his business depends on the strength of private property rights.

Absolutely- everyone should trust Trump.

I am sure each of the persons who lost money when one of his business's declared bankruptcy feels the same way- just Trump will do the right thing.

A bunch of loan sharks? I don't think anybody is feeling a lot of sympathy.

 

[Syriusly]

Yes, I trust him because his business depends on the strength of private property rights.

Absolutely- everyone should trust Trump.

I am sure each of the persons who lost money when one of his business's declared bankruptcy feels the same way- just Trump will do the right thing.

A bunch of loan sharks? I don't think anybody is feeling a lot of sympathy.

Of course not.

Because they had every reason to trust Trump.

Because of course Trump would never screw anyone over.

What capitalist would?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Trump didn't write the law, pass the law, or sign the law. How is he getting blamed for it? And if anyone thinks the Democrats are any more likely to change it, think again.

Of course not- Trump has never had anything to do with governing or the law.

But Trump eagerly used the law to try to move a private residence out of her home to advance his private business interests.

If you agree with that- well Trump is your man.

He tried to persuade her, tried to buy her, tried to use the LEGAL process to move her out. Everything failed.

The political establishment of both parties they dont play that game. If the woman wouldnt have moved, they would have pulled strings and traded favors to get her property condemned and then they would have gotten it on auction pennies on the dollar.

Again, you would understand this if you werent so fucking ignorant.

 

[depotoo]

He has had local govt use it a number of times for his projects before.
And he has so much money, Soros has helped his finance a few projects.
http://www.thehealersjournal.com/20...-filed-against-george-soros-and-donald-trump/

Soros Spin-Off Part Of Trio Investing In Trump Project | Institutional Investor's Alpha

I agree with SJ. Trump has plenty of money and clout already he doesn't need eminent domain.

 

[JimBowie1958]

He has had local govt use it a number of times for his projects before.
And he has so much money, Soros has helped his finance a few projects.
http://www.thehealersjournal.com/20...-filed-against-george-soros-and-donald-trump/

Soros Spin-Off Part Of Trio Investing In Trump Project | Institutional Investor's Alpha

I agree with SJ. Trump has plenty of money and clout already he doesn't need eminent domain.

You seem to be in some confusion here; that is a lawsuit filed with allegations, not a conviction.

But honestly, I think the GOP establishment is going to dig for something on him and use it to send the man to jail, but hopefully he will last long enough to get Carson nominated.

 

[depotoo]

It was used to show their investment together-not to show a conviction. I also provided a link to their work together in Chicago. There are other projects together, as well.

He has had local govt use it a number of times for his projects before.
And he has so much money, Soros has helped his finance a few projects.
RICO Lawsuit Filed Against George Soros and Donald Trump

Soros Spin-Off Part Of Trio Investing In Trump Project | Institutional Investor's Alpha

I agree with SJ. Trump has plenty of money and clout already he doesn't need eminent domain.

You seem to be in some confusion here; that is a lawsuit filed with allegations, not a conviction.

But honestly, I think the GOP establishment is going to dig for something on him and use it to send the man to jail, but hopefully he will last long enough to get Carson nominated.

 

[Syriusly]

Trump didn't write the law, pass the law, or sign the law. How is he getting blamed for it? And if anyone thinks the Democrats are any more likely to change it, think again.

Of course not- Trump has never had anything to do with governing or the law.

But Trump eagerly used the law to try to move a private residence out of her home to advance his private business interests.

If you agree with that- well Trump is your man.

He tried to persuade her, tried to buy her, tried to use the LEGAL process to move her out. Everything failed.
.

Like I said

Trump eagerly used the law to try to force a woman out of her home to advance his private business interests.

If you agree with that- well Trump is your ma

 

[Syriusly]

Trump didn't write the law, pass the law, or sign the law. How is he getting blamed for it? And if anyone thinks the Democrats are any more likely to change it, think again.

Of course not- Trump has never had anything to do with governing or the law.

But Trump eagerly used the law to try to move a private residence out of her home to advance his private business interests.

If you agree with that- well Trump is your man.

Again, you would understand this if you werent so fucking ignorant.

You are the one who blindly believes every word Trump says- simply because he claims he is not a liberal.

Which part of Trump's history convinces you he is a Conservative- here let me give you some choices

1. Using government to condemn private property for his own profit
2. Getting remarried an average of every 10 years.
3. Having companies that filed 4 bankruptcies

 

[S.J.]

Trump didn't write the law, pass the law, or sign the law. How is he getting blamed for it? And if anyone thinks the Democrats are any more likely to change it, think again.

Of course not- Trump has never had anything to do with governing or the law.

But Trump eagerly used the law to try to move a private residence out of her home to advance his private business interests.

If you agree with that- well Trump is your man.

Again, you would understand this if you werent so fucking ignorant.

You are the one who blindly believes every word Trump says- simply because he claims he is not a liberal.

Which part of Trump's history convinces you he is a Conservative- here let me give you some choices

1. Using government to condemn private property for his own profit
2. Getting remarried an average of every 10 years.
3. Having companies that filed 4 bankruptcies

Do you really think you're gonna convince anyone to not vote for Trump by saying "he's not a conservative"? I guess you think we're gonna put another squishy rino up there again so the media can knock him down and put your communist candidate in the WH. Sorry, it ain't happening this time. I don't care what kind of baggage Trump has, he's still preferable to any candidate in the Dem Party.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Do you trust Trump to NOT weaken the rights of private property owners if elected?"

Trump would seek to undermine the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay Americans, the voting rights of minorities, and the due process rights of immigrants if elected – private property owners aren't alone in fearing a Trump 'presidency' would jeopardize their rights.

 

[S.J.]

"Do you trust Trump to NOT weaken the rights of private property owners if elected?"

Trump would seek to undermine the privacy rights of women, the equal protection rights of gay Americans, the voting rights of minorities, and the due process rights of immigrants if elected – private property owners aren't alone in fearing a Trump 'presidency' would jeopardize their rights.

LOL Got anything to back up that ridiculous assertion?

 

[thereisnospoon]

Eminent Domain could be a real problem if it were amended under the control of a president who is a huge real estate developer. Granted he wouldn't benefit from it while in office but he could certainly set up the domino's for his empire upon leaving office.

Just to note, I literally know jackshit about this kind of stuff so this is just me thinking out loud from a position that does not have the knowledge but plenty of concern.

I want to be able to trust Trump.

Trump is fine with using eminent domain for the profit of private companies and individuals.

He doesn't need to do anything about it right now- since States have the authority to take private property away from owners to sell to companies so that they can make more money.

Personally I think that every State should ban the practice.

Trump thinks its a great idea.

almost all eminent domain cases involve public facility construction, mostly highways. But if you want to ban it for any privately owned facility, I am with you. Get the laws changed.

Trump was actively involved with a case of eminent domain to force a private home out of an area to build a casino in Atlantic City.

There is a rational for eminent domain to build roads and such- but to me the idea of using eminent domain so other people can make more money is repugnant. Yes the laws need to change.

One home...Hmm. This usually involves one holdout. One owner who has an inflated idea of what their property is worth.
In many of these cases, these property owners just dig in there heels "because they can"....Their properties are usually not in rthe footprint of any physical structure but standing in the path of a roadway or other public thoroughfare. At that point the project managers will present an offer, usually for MORE than the property is worth just to entice the owner into vacating.
When that doesn't work they go to the city and ask for eminent domain procedures. As long as it can be proved that the removal of the current property owner is in the best interests of the municipality, eminent domain can be applied.
It's a case by case situation.
Now, earlier in the thread I posted a link to a story that took place in New London, CT....That was entirely different. And it actually turned out beneficial for private property rights as over 40 states passed legislation strengthening private property rights.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Eminent Domain could be a real problem if it were amended under the control of a president who is a huge real estate developer. Granted he wouldn't benefit from it while in office but he could certainly set up the domino's for his empire upon leaving office.

Just to note, I literally know jackshit about this kind of stuff so this is just me thinking out loud from a position that does not have the knowledge but plenty of concern.

I want to be able to trust Trump.

Trump is fine with using eminent domain for the profit of private companies and individuals.

He doesn't need to do anything about it right now- since States have the authority to take private property away from owners to sell to companies so that they can make more money.

Personally I think that every State should ban the practice.

Trump thinks its a great idea.

almost all eminent domain cases involve public facility construction, mostly highways. But if you want to ban it for any privately owned facility, I am with you. Get the laws changed.

Trump was actively involved with a case of eminent domain to force a private home out of an area to build a casino in Atlantic City.

There is a rational for eminent domain to build roads and such- but to me the idea of using eminent domain so other people can make more money is repugnant. Yes the laws need to change.

George W. Bush and his podnuhs did likewise with the Texas Rangers stadium.

Often. Blighted areas are disrupted for new projects. The idea is well liked by politicians on both sides of the aisle as they tend to start a revitalization of the blighted area.
Some do not work out so well. It boils down to whether or not city leaders can attract private sector investors to pump money into the surrounding area.
Two such successes are the baseball stadiums in Louisville, KY and Indianapolis. In both cases, as a result of the stadiums, the surrounding areas were revitalized and turned into usable areas with shops, restaurants and other amenities.
Ones that did not go well...The Miami Arena. This project was supposed to improve the Overtown district of Miami. The investment never materialized.
And in Atlanta, the current home of the Braves, Turner Field resulted in the relocation of public housing to a site a few blocks away . The Braves organization kicked in millions to assist the City in building new public housing. However, the investment dollars near the stadium were not to be had. Unfortunately the neighborhood around the stadium is still in decline. Crime in the immediate area is on the increase and braves officials cite this as a reason fro declining attendance.
Consequently, the Braves are building a new ballpark in Northwest Atlanta, ( Smyrna in Cobb County to be exact) which is a much nicer area.

 

[Redfish]

Eminent Domain could be a real problem if it were amended under the control of a president who is a huge real estate developer. Granted he wouldn't benefit from it while in office but he could certainly set up the domino's for his empire upon leaving office.

Just to note, I literally know jackshit about this kind of stuff so this is just me thinking out loud from a position that does not have the knowledge but plenty of concern.

I want to be able to trust Trump.

Trump is fine with using eminent domain for the profit of private companies and individuals.

He doesn't need to do anything about it right now- since States have the authority to take private property away from owners to sell to companies so that they can make more money.

Personally I think that every State should ban the practice.

Trump thinks its a great idea.

almost all eminent domain cases involve public facility construction, mostly highways. But if you want to ban it for any privately owned facility, I am with you. Get the laws changed.

Trump was actively involved with a case of eminent domain to force a private home out of an area to build a casino in Atlantic City.

There is a rational for eminent domain to build roads and such- but to me the idea of using eminent domain so other people can make more money is repugnant. Yes the laws need to change.

Ok, great, we all agree. But until those laws are changed, bashing Trump for doing business in full compliance with the law is juvenile and meaningless.