Zone1 Do you trust radiocarbon dating?

[toobfreak]

No, the Bible says. What bullshit you spread.
I have answered your questions. Scared?

Give it up, dude, I'm not attacking anything, Just admit that whoever wrote 'The Creation' was either just not "the absolute, unarguable word of God" or God was leading mankind on the merry primrose path about the universe because he was too primitive for any better understanding at that time.

Not saying science is perfect neither, but at least it admits its mistakes and tries to be self-correcting.

 

[Quantrill]

Give it up, dude, I'm not attacking anything, Just admit that whoever wrote 'The Creation' was either just not "the absolute, unarguable word of God" or God was leading mankind on the merry primrose path about the universe because he was too primitive for any better understanding at that time.

Not saying science is perfect neither, but at least it admits its mistakes and tries to be self-correcting.

The Bible is the Word of God. Which means (Genesis) is the Word of God. And it proves you are a liar and a coward atheist. Typical atheist bullshit.

Answer my questions in post #(64) and (71). What are you afraid of? Is your 'faith' in science faltering?

Quantrill

 

[toobfreak]

The Bible is the Word of God.

So the Bible at least says so, but then, we all know that the Bible was written both rather sporadically and way out of order by about 30 or so people over about 1500 years.

Whatcha gonna do, burn me at the stake for not being an unequivocal "believer?"

 

[Quantrill]

So the Bible at least says so, but then, we all know that the Bible was written both rather sporadically and way out of order by about 30 or so people over about 1500 years.

Whatcha gonna do, burn me at the stake for not being an unequivocal "believer?"

You are free to believe whatever you like. The Bible says it is the Word of God. I believe it. Whose 'we'? Are you begging for help? Got a mouse in your pocket?

No, I just show how you an atheist is a coward and refuses to answer my questions. Which means you and your science, when it comes to the Bible, are full of shit. Which means your opinion of the Bible is the same.

Quantrill

 

[mikegriffith1]

The science has been well proven and is accurate. Sorry.

Did you even bother to watch the videos? Radiocarbon dating is not always accurate. Sometimes it is off by massive amounts of time. I don't argue for a young Earth. I think the Earth is billions of years of old. The Bible does not require a young Earth, contrary to what many misguided evangelicals believe. But, to pretend that carbon dating is always accurate is wrong.

 

[alang1216]

Did you even bother to watch the videos? Radiocarbon dating is not always accurate. Sometimes it is off by massive amounts of time. I don't argue for a young Earth. I think the Earth is billions of years of old. The Bible does not require a young Earth, contrary to what many misguided evangelicals believe. But, to pretend that carbon dating is always accurate is wrong.

Nothing is ever 100% accurate but I felt the video was non-scientific and biased. Radiocarbon dating is not accurate for samples less than 500 years so dating Mt St. Helens rocks was a deliberate fraud.

 

[toobfreak]

Did you even bother to watch the videos? Sometimes it is off by massive amounts of time.

Seriously, Mike? A Youtube video is your evidence? Where RC dating deviates, it is not only well-understood, but why and efforts are continually under way to allow for and compensate for this. A few deviations and exceptions which are being studied and accounted for does not nullify an entire scientific field of study.