Do you think Trump would tell police who are facing rioters to shoot to kill?

[TheOldSchool]

Do you think Trump would tell police who are facing rioters to shoot to kill?

I think he would do it in a second. Especially of the police were white and the protesters black or Hispanic.

And if Trump becomes president, you know he will spend a fortune, with GOP approval of course, for all kinds of new military riot gear.

Absolutely. Look at how righties celebrate the Kent State shootings. Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens, and he's the most celebrated republican of all time. Trump would order a total massacre in a heartbeat.

Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens,

When did he do that? Where?

The next year, anti-war demonstrations caused more protests and a riot at UC Santa Barbara.

"If it takes a bloodbath to silence the demonstrators," Reagan said, "let's get it over with."

Hard line helped him win, flexibility helped him stay / Ability to compromise replaced his tough stance against UC student protests

Did it take a bloodbath?

He tried at Berkeley, which some would consider a bloodbath, and celebrated the Kent State bloodbath.

 

[kwc57]

Do you think Trump would tell police who are facing rioters to shoot to kill?

I think he would do it in a second. Especially of the police were white and the protesters black or Hispanic.

And if Trump becomes president, you know he will spend a fortune, with GOP approval of course, for all kinds of new military riot gear.

No. Contrary to what liberals think, a President doesn't have those kinds of powers. Local police forces don't answer to the President. Next silly question?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Do you think Trump would tell police who are facing rioters to shoot to kill?

I think he would do it in a second. Especially of the police were white and the protesters black or Hispanic.

And if Trump becomes president, you know he will spend a fortune, with GOP approval of course, for all kinds of new military riot gear.

Absolutely. Look at how righties celebrate the Kent State shootings. Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens, and he's the most celebrated republican of all time. Trump would order a total massacre in a heartbeat.

Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens,

When did he do that? Where?

The next year, anti-war demonstrations caused more protests and a riot at UC Santa Barbara.

"If it takes a bloodbath to silence the demonstrators," Reagan said, "let's get it over with."

Hard line helped him win, flexibility helped him stay / Ability to compromise replaced his tough stance against UC student protests

Did it take a bloodbath?

He tried at Berkeley, which some would consider a bloodbath, and celebrated the Kent State bloodbath.

He tried at Berkeley

He called for a bloodbath and it didn't happen?

Maybe he didn't really call for one, eh?

 

[320 Years of History]

Your question is one for which I don't have an answer I feel comfortable articulating because I have no reliable and credible way to choose between the two very simple choices, "yes" or "no." And that is the problem I have with Trump overall. In addition to seeing instance after instance of the man saying one thing and having done another thing, most notably but not solely on economic/financial matters, the man just isn't clear enough about what the thinks and wants to do for me to have the first f*cking idea of what the hell that man would do in any given situation. About the only thing I'm reasonably certain of is that he'd do what works best for him and his family, regardless of whether it's legal, ethically/morally right or ethically/morally wrong.

He won't be Hillary. That works for me.

Yes, well, we know the bar for Trumpeteers demand in a candidate, like that for Trump himself, is quite low.

 

[bripat9643]

Do you think Trump would tell police who are facing rioters to shoot to kill?

I think he would do it in a second. Especially of the police were white and the protesters black or Hispanic.

And if Trump becomes president, you know he will spend a fortune, with GOP approval of course, for all kinds of new military riot gear.

No, but he would have them arrested when they assault people or damage property. Obama is content to let them run amok.

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question is one for which I don't have an answer I feel comfortable articulating because I have no reliable and credible way to choose between the two very simple choices, "yes" or "no." And that is the problem I have with Trump overall. In addition to seeing instance after instance of the man saying one thing and having done another thing, most notably but not solely on economic/financial matters, the man just isn't clear enough about what the thinks and wants to do for me to have the first f*cking idea of what the hell that man would do in any given situation. About the only thing I'm reasonably certain of is that he'd do what works best for him and his family, regardless of whether it's legal, ethically/morally right or ethically/morally wrong.

He won't be Hillary. That works for me.

Yes, well, we know the bar for Trumpeteers demand in a candidate, like that for Trump himself, is quite low.

Not low enough for Hilldog.

 

[320 Years of History]

Your question is one for which I don't have an answer I feel comfortable articulating because I have no reliable and credible way to choose between the two very simple choices, "yes" or "no." And that is the problem I have with Trump overall. In addition to seeing instance after instance of the man saying one thing and having done another thing, most notably but not solely on economic/financial matters, the man just isn't clear enough about what the thinks and wants to do for me to have the first f*cking idea of what the hell that man would do in any given situation. About the only thing I'm reasonably certain of is that he'd do what works best for him and his family, regardless of whether it's legal, ethically/morally right or ethically/morally wrong.

He won't be Hillary. That works for me.

Yes, well, we know the bar for Trumpeteers demand in a candidate, like that for Trump himself, is quite low.

Not low enough for Hilldog.

Okay, fine. Now go find someone else with whom to have an inane contretemps. I'm not interested.

 

[rdean]

Jesus Christ. This boy done lost his marbles. LE isn't centrally controlled. Every state, city, county has their own force and not accountable to the president. That's apart from the hysteria in your post.

What I have advocated for many years is water canons. Why don't we use them? Clears the streets fast.

They did, I remember it clearly from when I was a teen. Women and children included.

Didn't clear the streets. Only made them more persistent.

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question is one for which I don't have an answer I feel comfortable articulating because I have no reliable and credible way to choose between the two very simple choices, "yes" or "no." And that is the problem I have with Trump overall. In addition to seeing instance after instance of the man saying one thing and having done another thing, most notably but not solely on economic/financial matters, the man just isn't clear enough about what the thinks and wants to do for me to have the first f*cking idea of what the hell that man would do in any given situation. About the only thing I'm reasonably certain of is that he'd do what works best for him and his family, regardless of whether it's legal, ethically/morally right or ethically/morally wrong.

He won't be Hillary. That works for me.

Yes, well, we know the bar for Trumpeteers demand in a candidate, like that for Trump himself, is quite low.

Not low enough for Hilldog.

Okay, fine. Now go find someone else with whom to have an inane contretemps. I'm not interested.

Why are you humping my leg?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your question is one for which I don't have an answer I feel comfortable articulating because I have no reliable and credible way to choose between the two very simple choices, "yes" or "no." And that is the problem I have with Trump overall. In addition to seeing instance after instance of the man saying one thing and having done another thing, most notably but not solely on economic/financial matters, the man just isn't clear enough about what the thinks and wants to do for me to have the first f*cking idea of what the hell that man would do in any given situation. About the only thing I'm reasonably certain of is that he'd do what works best for him and his family, regardless of whether it's legal, ethically/morally right or ethically/morally wrong.

He won't be Hillary. That works for me.

Yes, well, we know the bar for Trumpeteers demand in a candidate, like that for Trump himself, is quite low.

we know the bar for Trumpeteers demand in a candidate, like that for Trump himself, is quite low

Yes, like no selling US uranium to Russia in exchange for "Foundation contributions".

 

[Iceweasel]

Jesus Christ. This boy done lost his marbles. LE isn't centrally controlled. Every state, city, county has their own force and not accountable to the president. That's apart from the hysteria in your post.

What I have advocated for many years is water canons. Why don't we use them? Clears the streets fast.

They did, I remember it clearly from when I was a teen. Women and children included.

Where did we lose our way? And why not women? And who brings kids to a riot?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

No. He'd tell them to go to school and get a job. They'd clear the streets in a split second.

Slavery Was the Only Way to Get Them to Work

Throwing work clothes at them would be even more effective in dispersing the mob.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Absolutely. Look at how righties celebrate the Kent State shootings. Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens, and he's the most celebrated republican of all time. Trump would order a total massacre in a heartbeat.

Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens,

When did he do that? Where?

The next year, anti-war demonstrations caused more protests and a riot at UC Santa Barbara.

"If it takes a bloodbath to silence the demonstrators," Reagan said, "let's get it over with."

Hard line helped him win, flexibility helped him stay / Ability to compromise replaced his tough stance against UC student protests

Did it take a bloodbath?

He tried at Berkeley, which some would consider a bloodbath, and celebrated the Kent State bloodbath.

He tried at Berkeley

He called for a bloodbath and it didn't happen?

Maybe he didn't really call for one, eh?

Yes he called for a bloodbath. The closest he came to personally ordering one was at Berkeley where hundreds suffered shotgun wounds and thousands were tear gassed.

 

[tycho1572]

Jesus Christ. This boy done lost his marbles. LE isn't centrally controlled. Every state, city, county has their own force and not accountable to the president. That's apart from the hysteria in your post.

What I have advocated for many years is water canons. Why don't we use them? Clears the streets fast.

I think rdean enjoys showing everyone he isn't too smucking fart.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Do you believe the drivel you write?

Of course you do and let be factual the Police sometimes are wrong but rioting and burning down your neighborhoods will not fix the issue either...

The Born-Rich Believe They Have Evolved Into a Separate and Superior Race

The fact that the jungle beasts riot, loot, and destroy proves that Civil Rights for the Uncivilized was a bad idea. It was passed by the plutocracy to humiliate the White working class and keep us in our place. Both Republicans and Democrats voted for it, so the united ruling class must be overthrown for its race treason. But the humiliation worked to demoralize us, so the Establishment and its spoiled brats are safe.

 

[Meathead]

No. He'd tell them to go to school and get a job. They'd clear the streets in a split second.

Sure. What could possibly go wrong with a bunch of thugs on the street?

 

[tycho1572]

Jesus Christ. This boy done lost his marbles. LE isn't centrally controlled. Every state, city, county has their own force and not accountable to the president. That's apart from the hysteria in your post.

What I have advocated for many years is water canons. Why don't we use them? Clears the streets fast.

They did, I remember it clearly from when I was a teen. Women and children included.

Didn't clear the streets. Only made them more persistent.

How old are you??

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens,

When did he do that? Where?

The next year, anti-war demonstrations caused more protests and a riot at UC Santa Barbara.

"If it takes a bloodbath to silence the demonstrators," Reagan said, "let's get it over with."

Hard line helped him win, flexibility helped him stay / Ability to compromise replaced his tough stance against UC student protests

Did it take a bloodbath?

He tried at Berkeley, which some would consider a bloodbath, and celebrated the Kent State bloodbath.

He tried at Berkeley

He called for a bloodbath and it didn't happen?

Maybe he didn't really call for one, eh?

Yes he called for a bloodbath. The closest he came to personally ordering one was at Berkeley where hundreds suffered shotgun wounds and thousands were tear gassed.

Yes he called for a bloodbath.

He was in charge of the National Guard.
They had guns and helicopters. If he wanted a bloodbath, they could have killed thousands of Commie protestors.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Reagan called for a "bloodbath" of American Citizens,

When did he do that? Where?

The next year, anti-war demonstrations caused more protests and a riot at UC Santa Barbara.

"If it takes a bloodbath to silence the demonstrators," Reagan said, "let's get it over with."

Hard line helped him win, flexibility helped him stay / Ability to compromise replaced his tough stance against UC student protests

Did it take a bloodbath?

He tried at Berkeley, which some would consider a bloodbath, and celebrated the Kent State bloodbath.

He tried at Berkeley

He called for a bloodbath and it didn't happen?

Maybe he didn't really call for one, eh?

Yes he called for a bloodbath. The closest he came to personally ordering one was at Berkeley where hundreds suffered shotgun wounds and thousands were tear gassed.

Karl Marx Was the Trophy Husband of a Patty Hearst Type Duchess


He backed down because all the student Leftists were brats of the rich. One of the few places where this was revealed was in the Robert Redford movie, Havana.

 

[TheOldSchool]

The next year, anti-war demonstrations caused more protests and a riot at UC Santa Barbara.

"If it takes a bloodbath to silence the demonstrators," Reagan said, "let's get it over with."

Hard line helped him win, flexibility helped him stay / Ability to compromise replaced his tough stance against UC student protests

Did it take a bloodbath?

He tried at Berkeley, which some would consider a bloodbath, and celebrated the Kent State bloodbath.

He tried at Berkeley

He called for a bloodbath and it didn't happen?

Maybe he didn't really call for one, eh?

Yes he called for a bloodbath. The closest he came to personally ordering one was at Berkeley where hundreds suffered shotgun wounds and thousands were tear gassed.

Yes he called for a bloodbath.

He was in charge of the National Guard.
They had guns and helicopters. If he wanted a bloodbath, they could have killed thousands of Commie protestors.

Good news for you, your hope for a real bloodbath is alive and kicking, as you and your rabble have managed to nominate a lunatic who would jump at the chance.