Zebra
Gold Member
By Thomas
And do you believe the stories in it?
And do you believe the stories in it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I have read it.So you know it!
Like how jesus killed a bunch of children?
Like father, like son.![]()
The "ransacking" (Josephus uses that term)of the Temple trade tables was done by the historical figure namedNo, but he did break a bunch of Jew's tables and scattered their money all over the floor.
Then there was that time he cussed at a fig bush and made it die. When Jesus says he wants figs, you'd better darned well give him figs.
That is not the childhood gospel!The "ransacking" (Josephus uses that term)of the Temple trade tables was done by the historical figure named
Yehuda the Gaulonite , often confused with Yehuda the Galilean christ a tax revolter who died in 6bc crucified by Rome for his tax revolt. Yehuda the Galilean is 1 of the trinity of christs used to make the Jesus image and legend therefore the Yehuda who robed and vandelized the trade tables made it's way into the Jesus stories either by purposely combining all stories (playgiarism) or via "passing stories down the line" in an era of lacking communications= errors confusing characters with similar names and titles.
Most likely these 2 confused figures was also used for the Jesus Barabbas story.
This was brought up within the topic, it's historical facts based on the historical figures used for the myth.That is not the childhood gospel!
yes, that is in the childhood gospel
Oh I know which one, knew what you referred to on the OP, it was about him at 5 killing a friend, the problem is, which of the many christ figures is the story referring to if not based on the fictional combined character. Thomas was not the only doubter removed from the gospels, there are portions of other texts like Luke removed chapter portion, who concluded that "his christ" was not who they'd hoped him to be, in that he failed to liberate them, in John he writes they all disbanded and scattered dissapointed. Mandeans, a sect of Sabaens claiming to be surviving followers of John the Baptist write that Jesus was the false prophet (everyone originally followed John) ,so they claim he had his friend follower Salome turn him in to be beheaded to steal his followers, they claim Jesus as a wicked false prophet.i meant the childhood gospel by Thomas
Mandeans .... sounds interestingOh I know which one, knew what you referred to on the OP, it was about him at 5 killing a friend, the problem is, which of the many christ figures is the story referring to if not based on the fictionary combined character. Thomas was not the only doubter removed from the gospels, there are portions of other texts like Luke removed chapter portion, who concluded that "his christ" was not who they'd hoped him to be, in that he never liberated them, in John he writes they all disbanded and scattered dissapointed. Mandeans, a sect of Sabaens claiming to be surviving followers of John the Baptist write that Jesus was the false prophet (everyone originally followed John) ,so they claim he had his friend follower Salome turn him in to be beheaded to steal his followers, they claim Jesus as a wicked false prophet.
You can look them up for what they teach.
I like the fact that their physical light teachings match the NT use of physical light references and analogies, as it helps pinpoint the historical cult and figures to their era and which figure they are calling Jesus.Mandeans .... sounds interesting
that pseudo.gospel does not show Jesus in a good light.The Infancy Gospel of Thomas doesn't cover Jesus' life past the age of twelve, so it's not a gospel, IMO. Jesus didn't deliver the gospel until after he started his ministry.
It also contradicts the canonical gospels. If Jesus performed miracles as a child, then his miracle at the wedding at Cana was not his first (Jn 2:11).
People get curious, creative. Jesus' story was a sensational one, a story that others would have run with.that pseudo.gospel does not show Jesus in a good light.
i wonder why it was ever written