Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 64,728
- 49,562
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #21
One thing I always notice is the stark contrast between beautiful "MAGA" women and insane leftist women
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Flipping the bird is still OK.I support arresting anyone who threatens, attacks, or impedes any Federal agent while doing their job.
Don't throw a Subway sandwich at them, even though its not food, just food adjacent.Flipping the bird is still OK.
The first amendment doesn’t protect threatsFirst Amendment is still a thing. Its not about speech we like..
True. Thats not a threat, however. It does not meet legal criteria for threat based crimes.The first amendment doesn’t protect threats
We'll see if they crack down on this sort of death threats. They've been getting away with this, without consequences, for too long
I have never understood this, why are you flipping the bird to the people enforcing the law? While voting for people that passed the law?Flipping the bird is still OK.
Maybe it’s not. The officer can still arrest and allow a jury to decideTrue. Thats not a threat, however. It does not meet legal criteria for threat based crimes.
When and where did throwing rocks at ICE agents, threatening ICE and their families, and using vehicles and other physical barriers to impede ICE become covered under the First Amendment ??First Amendment is still a thing. Its not about speech we like..
Is it or is it not a crime on any level to threaten any person, ICE agent or otherwise?What threat exactly is the OP referring to? Ms. Cook was turning from ICE THUGS when she was killed. It was the ICE THUG that got in front of her car. And no, it is NOT a federal crime to threaten ICE THUGS.
This is true.Maybe it’s not. The officer can still arrest and allow a jury to decide
I said speech.When and where did throwing rocks at ICE agents, threatening ICE and their families, and using vehicles and other physical barriers to impede ICE become covered under the First Amendment ??
This isn’t new, they did 150 years ago to keep their slavesIs it or is it not a crime on any level to threaten any person, ICE agent or otherwise?
The Left is setting precedent that if Americans don’t like a law that the Federal Government is enforcing, then it is justified to impede, threaten, and / or assault Federal law enforcement. This will come back to bite them in the ass.
Why is this news? People leave their jobs or get fired for not wanting to do their job all the timeSix Prosecutors Quit Over Push to Investigate ICE Shooting Victim’s Widow.
Joseph H. Thompson, a career federal prosecutor who was the acting U.S. attorney for Minnesota last year, was among those who resigned as the Justice Department sought to examine the woman’s supposed ties to activist groups.
Six federal prosecutors in Minnesota resigned on Tuesday over the Justice Department’s push to investigate the widow of a woman killed by an ICE agent and the department’s reluctance to investigate the shooter, according to people with knowledge of their decision.
Joseph H. Thompson, who was second in command at the U.S. attorney’s office and oversaw a sprawling fraud investigation that has roiled Minnesota’s political landscape, was among those who quit on Tuesday, according to three people with knowledge of the decision.
Mr. Thompson’s resignation came after senior Justice Department officials pressed for a criminal investigation into the actions of the widow of Renee Nicole Good, the Minneapolis woman killed by an ICE agent on Wednesday.
The DOJ is grasping straws. Investigating the widow of Ms. Cook in hopes of something, any thing is a sign of desperation on their part. It's also know throw shit against and see what sticks.
Of course it is. Do your homework. Or don't and find yourself in prisonAnd no, it is NOT a federal crime to threaten ICE THUGS.