Question for everyone who opposes Obama';s tax plan:
If it *doesn't* drag us down, if the country does better with it, AND you get more money (a tax cut) will you support the policy?
Personally, I don't care about a tax cut for me. I am concerned about the Obama Administration's spending habits. I was concerned about the Bush Administration's spending habits. I do not believe this country can survive at the rate we are going.
As for supporting the policy, I have said many times that I think we are spending too much money, but I pray for the success of the plan. We are not going to be paying for this. Our great grandchildren are going to have to pay for it, if America survives.
I pray that the spending bill does bring us out of the economic crisis we are in at the moment. And that doesn't mean we necessarily need to end up a socialist country either.
I hope the plan succeeds. I hope it falls short of the government taking control of industry. I'm not so sure that will happen, look they already have their hooks in finance and healthcare, what is next? President Obama has proven that he is more than happy to take control of every industry that he can get under his control.
Question for you: Do you want the government controlling your employer or your business? Do you want the government determining your wages and schedule? Do you want an impersonal government employee dictating your every career move?
Immie
I am in basic research, so you (and me) usuallypay for my paycheck. It has not been a problem to have the government 'determine' my pay (grant monies) in the >20 years that I've been at this. It doesn't dictate my career moves at all, for a while I took a break from research and got a job teaching. Also, there is nothing stopping me (or anyone in science) from getting private funds, and I have worked off of private funds in the past. No one is saying that capitalism stops if government spending in increased.
It's not the bogeyman, for crying out loud. In this particular example, scientific research is an investment. We build better weapons, offer better medicines, lead globally in technology - when we invest in science. That positions us ahead of China, India, and the rest of the world.
Your argument about who pays for it can be turned around: It's not you and me that will benefit most from the investment, it's our kids.
See? the whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.
Sweetie everything can be turned around it seems as though you have figured out how to stay afloat by using the system..OK for you
the people who have supplied you with private funds are probably those evil businessman. The question is what happens when they are taxed so much they can no longer help you.. The funds they so
generously give you will be controlled by guess who..
Now when those businesses no longer can raise prices to offset for increased taxes they have a decision to make--if they have put enough away for themselfs they will say by by .if not they will join you in applying for grants and such sooner or later it starts over again and the goverment will be asking business people for help..If I'm still alive payback will be very very costly if not so be it.
Being that you guys like quotes for the eliete in your society
Like Letterman and Maher I got a few for you from some guy in the past (one who helped the country maybe not to bright huh)
Words from a AM Patriot
When we get piled upon one another in large cities,as in Europe,
we become as corrupt as europe.
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes.
A principle which if acted on would save one -half the wars of the world.
I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the goverment from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
My reading of history convinces me that most bad govermentresults from to much goverment.
No free man shall ever be deprived the use of arms.
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is,as a last resort,to protect themselfs against tyranny in goverment.
The tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to timr with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas
ahich he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
I believe that banking institions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency,first by inflation,then by deflation,the banks and coroporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered..
Thaomas Jefferson said in 1802