Or, whip it out in public and embarrass yourself."preconceived notions?"
Right. Like my natural rights I got them at birth.
LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or, whip it out in public and embarrass yourself."preconceived notions?"
Right. Like my natural rights I got them at birth.
LOL
Wow!I could laugh sarcastically about how you use the word "sciene", ignorant. But I do not do so. Extremely short: Believers in science are not scientists. A real scientist doubts what we know. But one thing in this context here is totally clear. Under normal living conditions, a woman's fertilized egg cell becomes something more than just a brain in a utopian bottle. The egg cell will become a human being - but it takes a whole village to raise a human being. No women left alone. No men who don't take responsibility and win themselve to death.
Alrighty then!I've done that before. Got lots of interest. Paid well.
Procrustes Stretched
Why do I not have the feeling you are a humorful existence although you laugh theoretically a lot.
You: Mistaking myths and metaphors for what they are not.
If you think I give two craps what will happen to our species hundreds of millions of years from now... you are retarded. ...
What is not what, abstrahot?
That's why you are dead. Normals perop for example are interetwed in researchign woitzh niiosoisund of golalrs ahwt ahd hehehend billions of years ago. And you do not like to waste only one plausible thought into the future of all mankind. Some hundred million years is not a lot of time.
Because your mind is warped, poisoned, damaged, in distress?
You need to grow up.
Stop reverting back to the olden times. The world, life moves on.
Wow!
An "egg cell will become a human being?" I believe your confused again. No human being comes from "a" cell.
Natural rights exist? No.Do Natural Rights Actually Exist? If they do not then it's all intellectual bs. If they do, what are they? Can and do people who believe natural rights actually exist, agree on them -- what they are and are not?
I often see things similar to this Wikipedia entry:
Natural rights are those that are not dependent on the laws or customs of any particular culture or government, and so are universal, fundamental and inalienable (they cannot be repealed by human laws, though one can forfeit their enjoyment through one's actions, such as by violating someone else's rights).
Do natural rights trump laws? If so...
Do laws exist?Natural rights exist? No.
Laws are just within a society. When something wrong happens, a law is created.
That's the thing liberals get hung up on. Natural rights have nothing to do with laws, or whether a given government honors those rights. They're just the basic freedoms we all start with, our capacity to think and act. That's it.the #1 natural right is a right to one's autonomy.
that being honored by those in power is not always the case.
They're constructed within a society to hopefully keep it runningDo laws exist?
That's the thing liberals get hung up on. Natural rights have nothing to do with laws, or whether a given government honors those rights. They're just the basic freedoms we all start with, our capacity to think and act. That's it.
What are you talking about?? Where did I say that?so if the gov'ment wanted to force you into having a vasectomy - or better yet - turn you into a eunuch, then you'll have the attitude, 'oh well...' ?![]()
What are you talking about?? Where did I say that?