Do majority of Republicans think Theory of Evolution is a fact ?

[Wyatt earp]

"You are, of course, free to believe those fairy tales if you wish."

Just as you goofball deniers are free to enjoy the benefits of our scientific knowledge, no matter what goofy superstitions or fetishes warp your perception of it.

What fairy tales? This just happened...

If this hit earth it wouldn't of broke up in the atmosphere..it was speculated to be a quarter mile ..and way to fast



View attachment 162853

"Fairy tales"...those are your words. I'm not seeing your point.

We know how indoctrinated you are ..kind of waste of my breath even retorting to you kid.

That certainly is whiny of you.

Is that your retort once again you play ignorance...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So? The fact that it has come from outside our solar system doesn't make it willy-nilly. Something got it moving this way and the gravity of the sun has pulled it into our system.

What are you playing stupid? Look at the trajectory ...





View attachment 162836

What about the trajectory? The object came zipping into our solar system, it was pulled towards and curved around the sun, and it was moving too fast to be captured and flew back off into space.

That's not gravity...that came from another solar system..

Or gravity is just a theory..


Its star would of never let it do it ..if gravity was in play


The stars around us are kind of stable and keep all the planets, asteroids , in check this one was bizarre..


If gravity was a "fact" we just got a warning shot across our bow...

Once again


View attachment 162843

The body might have been a piece of a star that went nova, two galaxies colliding, two stars colliding, or just a mass that never made it into a solar system in the first place. Space is not totally empty.

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

You are making a lot of incorrect claims about this interstellar body's appearance in our solar system.. You really need to go read up before commenting on it again

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"You are, of course, free to believe those fairy tales if you wish."

Just as you goofball deniers are free to enjoy the benefits of our scientific knowledge, no matter what goofy superstitions or fetishes warp your perception of it.

What fairy tales? This just happened...

If this hit earth it wouldn't of broke up in the atmosphere..it was speculated to be a quarter mile ..and way to fast



View attachment 162853

"Fairy tales"...those are your words. I'm not seeing your point.

We know how indoctrinated you are ..kind of waste of my breath even retorting to you kid.

That certainly is whiny of you.

Is that your retort once again you play ignorance...

No, I was being honest. I wasn't sure of what your point was. But then I read the many incorrect things you said about the interstellar body and realized it probably wasn't a point worth hearing. Moving on...

 

[Wyatt earp]

"How odd that you think any scientific law is going to come to humans without a thought process "

How bizarre that you would gather that from a single word I said. It doesb's matter that we used scientific method to discover laws and formulate theories. The difference between these xonxepts is what matters, when correcting the many errors you are making. No, scientific theories are not "ideas trykng to become laws" nor do they ever become laws.

Thr things you are saying would be ridiculed in a serious scientific setting. Don't believe me? Go try it.

Perhaps you should elaborate on what scientific method is then.

Haha, no. The scientific method is well-defined, and you can look it up yourself. And I was just putting your ideas regarding "thought process" in another, better way.

Ha ha ha you are just a ****** from Indiana..and a child..

Retort that

 

[Wyatt earp]

What fairy tales? This just happened...

If this hit earth it wouldn't of broke up in the atmosphere..it was speculated to be a quarter mile ..and way to fast



View attachment 162853

"Fairy tales"...those are your words. I'm not seeing your point.

We know how indoctrinated you are ..kind of waste of my breath even retorting to you kid.

That certainly is whiny of you.

Is that your retort once again you play ignorance...

No, I was being honest. I wasn't sure of what your point was. But then I read the many incorrect things you said about the interstellar body and realized it probably wasn't a point worth hearing. Moving on...

Your playing the alinsky rules kid..you can't defend it

 

[MarkDuffy]

It looks to me gravity is false or an alien race tried to target us


Small Asteroid or Comet 'Visits' from Beyond the Solar System

They missed

At least I am making you aware ...

65 million years ago, they didn't miss

 

[OKTexas]

And that alters the FACT that a fetus is just a human child in a pre-birth stage of development, HOW???????? Damn you regressives are ignorant when you want to justify ending the life of a human..

There is no fact that the fetus is a human child. That is conferred upon birth. You can yell all you want, but you can't change reality or biology.

More semantics, leave the damn thing alone and see what the outcome is..

Your continued babbling does not change that you are wrong.

Typical intellectually dishonest regressive, can't respond so you throw out and ad hom and declare victory. You're too stupid to even be funny..

You are progressively babbling goofy comments. That which is true is not ad hom. Foxfyre could not grasp that fact, either. Your "regressive are ignorant" is an ad hom by your standard.

That happens sometime when I have to deal with an intellectually dishonest regressive liar, wanting to just play word games.


.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"How odd that you think any scientific law is going to come to humans without a thought process "

How bizarre that you would gather that from a single word I said. It doesb's matter that we used scientific method to discover laws and formulate theories. The difference between these xonxepts is what matters, when correcting the many errors you are making. No, scientific theories are not "ideas trykng to become laws" nor do they ever become laws.

Thr things you are saying would be ridiculed in a serious scientific setting. Don't believe me? Go try it.

Perhaps you should elaborate on what scientific method is then.

Haha, no. The scientific method is well-defined, and you can look it up yourself. And I was just putting your ideas regarding "thought process" in another, better way.

Ha ha ha you are just a ****** from Indiana..and a child..

Retort that

What is there to "retort" (sic)? If that's your behavior, the best way to embarrass you is to just let you talk.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What are you playing stupid? Look at the trajectory ...





View attachment 162836

What about the trajectory? The object came zipping into our solar system, it was pulled towards and curved around the sun, and it was moving too fast to be captured and flew back off into space.

That's not gravity...that came from another solar system..

Or gravity is just a theory..


Its star would of never let it do it ..if gravity was in play


The stars around us are kind of stable and keep all the planets, asteroids , in check this one was bizarre..


If gravity was a "fact" we just got a warning shot across our bow...

Once again


View attachment 162843

The body might have been a piece of a star that went nova, two galaxies colliding, two stars colliding, or just a mass that never made it into a solar system in the first place. Space is not totally empty.

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

You are making a lot of incorrect claims about this interstellar body's appearance in our solar system.. You really need to go read up before commenting on it again

So provide proof kid..

Waiting..

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What about the trajectory? The object came zipping into our solar system, it was pulled towards and curved around the sun, and it was moving too fast to be captured and flew back off into space.

That's not gravity...that came from another solar system..

Or gravity is just a theory..


Its star would of never let it do it ..if gravity was in play


The stars around us are kind of stable and keep all the planets, asteroids , in check this one was bizarre..


If gravity was a "fact" we just got a warning shot across our bow...

Once again


View attachment 162843

The body might have been a piece of a star that went nova, two galaxies colliding, two stars colliding, or just a mass that never made it into a solar system in the first place. Space is not totally empty.

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

You are making a lot of incorrect claims about this interstellar body's appearance in our solar system.. You really need to go read up before commenting on it again

So provide proof kid..

Waiting..

Proof...of what? Be a big boy, use your words....

 

[Wyatt earp]

"How odd that you think any scientific law is going to come to humans without a thought process "

How bizarre that you would gather that from a single word I said. It doesb's matter that we used scientific method to discover laws and formulate theories. The difference between these xonxepts is what matters, when correcting the many errors you are making. No, scientific theories are not "ideas trykng to become laws" nor do they ever become laws.

Thr things you are saying would be ridiculed in a serious scientific setting. Don't believe me? Go try it.

Perhaps you should elaborate on what scientific method is then.

Haha, no. The scientific method is well-defined, and you can look it up yourself. And I was just putting your ideas regarding "thought process" in another, better way.

Ha ha ha you are just a ****** from Indiana..and a child..

Retort that

What is there to "retort" (sic)? If that's your behavior, the best way to embarrass you is to just let you talk.

Once again you never provide proof..i have..

 

[Wyatt earp]

That's not gravity...that came from another solar system..

Or gravity is just a theory..


Its star would of never let it do it ..if gravity was in play


The stars around us are kind of stable and keep all the planets, asteroids , in check this one was bizarre..


If gravity was a "fact" we just got a warning shot across our bow...

Once again


View attachment 162843

The body might have been a piece of a star that went nova, two galaxies colliding, two stars colliding, or just a mass that never made it into a solar system in the first place. Space is not totally empty.

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

You are making a lot of incorrect claims about this interstellar body's appearance in our solar system.. You really need to go read up before commenting on it again

So provide proof kid..

Waiting..

Proof...of what? Be a big boy, use your words....

Proof of you know the facts little girl, pull your big pantys up and provide proof of your opinions for once and all..other wise your just a troll for me to flame

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"How odd that you think any scientific law is going to come to humans without a thought process "

How bizarre that you would gather that from a single word I said. It doesb's matter that we used scientific method to discover laws and formulate theories. The difference between these xonxepts is what matters, when correcting the many errors you are making. No, scientific theories are not "ideas trykng to become laws" nor do they ever become laws.

Thr things you are saying would be ridiculed in a serious scientific setting. Don't believe me? Go try it.

Perhaps you should elaborate on what scientific method is then.

Haha, no. The scientific method is well-defined, and you can look it up yourself. And I was just putting your ideas regarding "thought process" in another, better way.

Ha ha ha you are just a ****** from Indiana..and a child..

Retort that

What is there to "retort" (sic)? If that's your behavior, the best way to embarrass you is to just let you talk.

Once again you never provide proof..i have..


View attachment 162857

You have provided proof...of what? Be a big boy, use your words..

 

[MarkDuffy]

So? The fact that it has come from outside our solar system doesn't make it willy-nilly. Something got it moving this way and the gravity of the sun has pulled it into our system.

What are you playing stupid? Look at the trajectory ...





View attachment 162836

What about the trajectory? The object came zipping into our solar system, it was pulled towards and curved around the sun, and it was moving too fast to be captured and flew back off into space.

That's not gravity...that came from another solar system..

Or gravity is just a theory..


Its star would of never let it do it ..if gravity was in play


The stars around us are kind of stable and keep all the planets, asteroids , in check this one was bizarre..


If gravity was a "fact" we just got a warning shot across our bow...

Once again


View attachment 162843

The body might have been a piece of a star that went nova, two galaxies colliding, two stars colliding, or just a mass that never made it into a solar system in the first place. Space is not totally empty.

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

I seriously doubt that. No member of a solar system can leave the solar system w/o help. The body would need an input of energy to reach escape velocity.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The body might have been a piece of a star that went nova, two galaxies colliding, two stars colliding, or just a mass that never made it into a solar system in the first place. Space is not totally empty.

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

You are making a lot of incorrect claims about this interstellar body's appearance in our solar system.. You really need to go read up before commenting on it again

So provide proof kid..

Waiting..

Proof...of what? Be a big boy, use your words....

Proof of you know the facts little girl, pull your big pantys up and provide proof of your opinions for once and all..other wise your just a troll for me to flame

You ask me to provide proof, but won't say what you want me to prove.

You say you have provided proof, but won't say what you have proven.

How bizarre.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Hush little girl and quit being a troll

Provide facts and links

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Hush little girl and quit being a troll

Provide facts and links

To what? Nobody knows what the hell you are trying to say.

 

[Wyatt earp]

The nearest star is 4 light years away..on a plain like ours

This came from some other solar system and break neck speed

You are making a lot of incorrect claims about this interstellar body's appearance in our solar system.. You really need to go read up before commenting on it again

So provide proof kid..

Waiting..

Proof...of what? Be a big boy, use your words....

Proof of you know the facts little girl, pull your big pantys up and provide proof of your opinions for once and all..other wise your just a troll for me to flame

You ask me to provide proof, but won't say what you want me to prove.

You say you have provided proof, but won't say what you have proven.

How bizarre.

Probably because your so stupid you can't follow a thread and have to try to derail it with childish nonsense

 

[jc456]

I believe the book of Genesis is factual. Read the ending of the book of Revelation. There will be a new heaven and a new earth. It is difficult for me to imagine that the original earth was different than the new one. And how is that new earth described? It will have no mountains or oceans. Doesn't that give anyone a clue to how this "original" earth once looked?

I firmly believe that the FLOOD revamped the earth of Adam and Eve. It is this reality that many scientists fail to consider or realize. What we presently observe likely has little relationship to the earth Adam viewed. It was a far different planet. This planet has faced bombardment by asteroids and meteors and perhaps even comets. The surface of the earth split apart with geysers and volcanic eruptions totally unknown to Adam.

If some scientists are going to disregard GOD, they are missing the most important piece of data available. And this will cause them both confusion and misunderstanding of the data they do possess. A secular hole is no different than a religious blanket. They both can bring about blindness to reality.

You’re at liberty to believe whatever myths and fairytales you so desire.

But neither the Earth nor man were created by a deity.

There was no ‘flood,’ no Adam and Eve, no garden of Eden.

The bible is the creation of man, written by men, ‘inspired’ by no deity – the bible merely propagates ancient myths, folklores, and legends.

The flood myth, for example, was appropriated from Mesopotamian mythology – the Epic of Gilgamesh – which predates the bible, where the annual flooding of rivers was the most powerful force known to the civilizations of the Fertile Crescent.You are, of course, free to believe those fairy tales if you wish.

"You are, of course, free to believe those fairy tales if you wish."

Just as you goofball deniers are free to enjoy the benefits of our scientific knowledge, no matter what goofy superstitions or fetishes warp your perception of it.

Let us know when you get some of that scientific knowledge!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Hush little girl and quit being a troll

Provide facts and links

To what? Nobody knows what the hell you are trying to say.